Someone install version 1.0 from release. So far, so good, but he hear
that 1.1 is out, and he install it from backport ( after requesting ).
He is satisfied, then the developers of our voip software decide to
create a version 2.0, with a completely new interface but the ui is yet
unfinished and
A short reality check from userside:
If foo-1.0 is in Mageia 1 and foo-1.1 is released upstream
- foo-1.1 will likely be integrated in Cauldron very soon after
- users will request to have foo-1.1 in Mageia 1
- if Mageia will not provide it then there will soon be local
repositories where
Op zondag 26 juni 2011 00:16:59 schreef Michael Scherer:
[...]
we
always say that backports should mainly be cherry picked, but not
enabled all the time... so how does installing a new version of e.g.
wine break the user's system when he can easily back out that rpm?
I a not sure that
2011/6/26 Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com:
A short reality check from userside:
If foo-1.0 is in Mageia 1 and foo-1.1 is released upstream
- foo-1.1 will likely be integrated in Cauldron very soon after
- users will request to have foo-1.1 in Mageia 1
- if Mageia will not provide
I a not sure that most people realize they can revert. Maybe a easier
interface to do that could be offered ( along maybe with a tool that
send feedback on why it did downgrade it ? ).
that's not a bad idea, what is the best way to revert? is that with --old-
package ?
Maybe I'm
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 11:49 +0300, Sander Lepik a écrit :
24.06.2011 03:15, Michael Scherer kirjutas:
Hi,
[ ... ]
Last solution, declare that cherry picking is not supported, or that
people are on their own, and explain the reason. However, people have
been asking this, and
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:58 AM, atilla ontas tarakbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I'm following this threat from the very beginning. While reading,
i feel i'm reading a Mandriva Cooker mailing list posts. As a
community distro, why Mageia developers still think like a Mandriva
employee? Why
26.06.2011 12:35, Michael Scherer kirjutas:
urpme package; urpmi package
That's not so easy if something depends on that package. How hard is it to implement rpm's
--oldpackage to urpmi? I really don't know but i hope it's nothing too hard.
--
Sander
Op zondag 26 juni 2011 12:10:14 schreef Sander Lepik:
26.06.2011 12:35, Michael Scherer kirjutas:
urpme package; urpmi package
That's not so easy if something depends on that package. How hard is it to
implement rpm's --oldpackage to urpmi? I really don't know but i hope
it's nothing too
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 11:58 +0300, atilla ontas a écrit :
2011/6/26 Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com:
A short reality check from userside:
If foo-1.0 is in Mageia 1 and foo-1.1 is released upstream
- foo-1.1 will likely be integrated in Cauldron very soon after
- users
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:24, Mageia Team
buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote:
Name : scourge-data Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.21.1 Vendor: Mageia.Org
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 11:43 +0200, Daniel Kreuter a écrit :
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:58 AM, atilla ontas tarakbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I'm following this threat from the very beginning. While reading,
i feel i'm reading a Mandriva Cooker mailing list posts. As a
community distro,
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 13:10 +0300, Sander Lepik a écrit :
26.06.2011 12:35, Michael Scherer kirjutas:
urpme package; urpmi package
That's not so easy if something depends on that package. How hard is it to
implement rpm's
--oldpackage to urpmi? I really don't know but i hope it's
2011/6/26 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 11:58 +0300, atilla ontas a écrit :
2011/6/26 Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com:
A short reality check from userside:
If foo-1.0 is in Mageia 1 and foo-1.1 is released upstream
- foo-1.1 will likely be integrated
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 14:49 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
2011/6/26 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 11:58 +0300, atilla ontas a écrit :
2011/6/26 Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com:
A short reality check from userside:
If foo-1.0 is in Mageia 1
2011/6/26 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Can people please stop saying that users are living in the real world,
as this logically imply that others ( ie, us, for whatever that mean )
are not ?
LOL! I did not expect that you take the single word over the expression.
When I set you, me,
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 13:17:27, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
This package requires scourge, which is not in the repository
yes but it doesn't buidld see :
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/201106252
On 26.06.2011 01:34, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 24 juin 2011 à 17:33 +0300, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 24.06.2011 03:10, Michael Scherer wrote:
Another rule that we could add is that cauldron should always be newer
than backports, in order to ensure upgradability. The same goes for n-2
In data domenica 26 giugno 2011 00:43:22, Michael Scherer ha scritto:
Le samedi 25 juin 2011 à 15:05 +0200, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
In data venerdì 24 giugno 2011 02:10:14, Michael Scherer ha scritto:
- cannot be backported if the package was just created and is thus
basically untested
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 18:00 +0300, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 26.06.2011 01:34, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 24 juin 2011 à 17:33 +0300, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 24.06.2011 03:10, Michael Scherer wrote:
Another rule that we could add is that cauldron should always be newer
Well, in principle this is correct, not in this case as I have
explained as a very common example. You can decide whatever you want,
if a user wants a certain package and his friend will pack it for him
and puts it up on a server, publishing the existence - then you will
see what happens. You
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 14/06/11 09:07 did gyre and gimble:
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 12/06/11 23:45 did gyre and gimble:
Hi,
The autologin package is broken due to the fact that it doesn't connect
to consolekit and thus the user who is automatically logged in doesn't
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:15 PM, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 114150 Author spuhler Date 2011-06-26 21:14:59 +0200 (Sun, 26 Jun
2011)
Log Message
downgrade to Version: 1
add subrel 1 for mga 1 updates
why do you add subrel in cauldron ?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 114173 Author spuhler Date 2011-06-26 21:34:20 +0200 (Sun, 26 Jun
2011)
Log Message
added define subrel 1 to submit to Mageia1 updates
Please modify in the update/1 tree for updates not in the cauldron one
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 09:57:22 am Damien Lallement wrote:
Hello all,
security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to
provide updates as soon as possible.
All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from
testing to updates). This script will be uses
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 09:57:22 am Damien Lallement wrote:
Hello all,
security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to
provide updates as soon as possible.
All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote:
On Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:37:29 pm Dexter Morgan wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 114173 Author spuhler Date 2011-06-26 21:34:20 +0200 (Sun, 26
Jun 2011)
Log Message
On Sunday, June 26, 2011 04:24:26 pm Dexter Morgan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com
wrote:
On Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:37:29 pm Dexter Morgan wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 114173 Author spuhler Date
On 27 June 2011 03:11, David W. Hodgins davidwhodg...@gmail.com wrote:
On my Mageia 1 install ...
urpmi --auto-select --resume --noclean
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
Package Version Release Arch
(medium Core
29 matches
Mail list logo
