On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 16:49, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
>> Shall we try that?
>
> Well, if you replace "bi-monthly" by "twice a month" (that seems to be what
> you mean), then: yes, please!
Yes.
Ok, test will go in a few minutes to all current assigne
Le vendredi 6 juillet 2012 18:04:57 D.Morgan a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
> please report in from now chromium is broken ( compared to before ).
>
> I am patching to use system libs instead of bundled ones ( i do one by one )
>
> regards;
> D.
Hi,
Maybe it explains what I read before ?
In the sense t
Hi,
please report in from now chromium is broken ( compared to before ).
I am patching to use system libs instead of bundled ones ( i do one by one )
regards;
D.
Le vendredi 6 juillet 2012 17:46:16 Marja van Waes a écrit :
> On 06/07/2012 16:49, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
> > (removed -discuss from the discussion)
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
> >> On 06/07/2012 14:22, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
> >> Maybe it works better in upgr
On 06/07/2012 16:49, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
(removed -discuss from the discussion)
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
On 06/07/2012 14:22, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
Maybe it works better in upgraded Bugzilla :)
No, it works in the current setup.
I think we should ping
(removed -discuss from the discussion)
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 14:22, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
> Maybe it works better in upgraded Bugzilla :)
No, it works in the current setup.
>> A monthly (or every 2 months) reminder of bugs fitting in your above
On 06/07/2012 15:17, Pascal Terjan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Marja van Waes wrote:
Not sure how useful it is.
I have received 25 emails so far in today's ping (and they keep coming).
Some of them because I am assignee, some because I am reporter, some I am in CC.
I probably need
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Marja van Waes wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Later today there'll be a mass assignee ping for Bugzilla.
>
> Unfortunately, everyone in the cc of the bugs will receive the ping, too.
>
> The only bugs that'll be pinged are that
> * were assigned more than 2 weeks ago
> *
On 06/07/2012 14:22, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
On 06/07/2012 13:59, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
Later today there'll be a mass assignee ping for Bugzilla.
Couldn't we use another method
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 13:59, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
>>>
>>> Later today there'll be a mass assignee ping for Bugzilla.
>>
>> Couldn't we use another method than this? Like using Bugzilla's
On 06/07/2012 13:59, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
Later today there'll be a mass assignee ping for Bugzilla.
Couldn't we use another method than this? Like using Bugzilla's native
whining feature, or an equivalent where each assignee only get
n
On 06/07/12 12:57, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 06/07/2012 13:19, AL13N a écrit :
On 06/07/12 07:56, Oliver Burger wrote:
[...]
This has nothing to do with being rude.
IIUC, a small bit of it is related in 2 instances (from my pov):
- QA team being ignored in their question
- packager being do
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Marja van Waes wrote:
> Later today there'll be a mass assignee ping for Bugzilla.
Couldn't we use another method than this? Like using Bugzilla's native
whining feature, or an equivalent where each assignee only get
notified of his assigned bugs in a single mail l
Le 06/07/2012 13:19, AL13N a écrit :
On 06/07/12 07:56, Oliver Burger wrote:
[...]
This has nothing to do with being rude.
IIUC, a small bit of it is related in 2 instances (from my pov):
- QA team being ignored in their question
- packager being doubted by QA team
(in some or other form
Hi everyone,
Later today there'll be a mass assignee ping for Bugzilla.
Unfortunately, everyone in the cc of the bugs will receive the ping, too.
The only bugs that'll be pinged are that
* were assigned more than 2 weeks ago
* where the assignee didn't do anything to the bug since more than two
> On 06/07/12 07:56, Oliver Burger wrote:
[...]
> This has nothing to do with being rude.
IIUC, a small bit of it is related in 2 instances (from my pov):
- QA team being ignored in their question
- packager being doubted by QA team
(in some or other forms, both of these can be seen as rude)
f
'Twas brillig, and Olav Vitters at 06/07/12 10:44 did gyre and gimble:
> task-gnome-minimal has the following:
> Suggests: preload
> Suggests: readahead
>
> IMO if something like that is needed, it should not belong in
> task-gnome-minimal, but something lowlevel like e.g. systemd.
>
> Even thoug
06.07.2012 12:44, Olav Vitters kirjutas:
task-gnome-minimal has the following:
Suggests: preload
Suggests: readahead
IMO if something like that is needed, it should not belong in
task-gnome-minimal, but something lowlevel like e.g. systemd.
Even though these are just suggests, I still want to g
task-gnome-minimal has the following:
Suggests: preload
Suggests: readahead
IMO if something like that is needed, it should not belong in
task-gnome-minimal, but something lowlevel like e.g. systemd.
Even though these are just suggests, I still want to get rid of it.
Any objections?
--
Regards
On 06/07/12 07:56, Oliver Burger wrote:
Am 06.07.2012 08:18, schrieb AL13N:
Op donderdag 5 juli 2012 23:52:39 schreef Claire Robinson:
With respect Nicolas, you're not on the receiving end.
[...]
allthough i see badly worded(possibly to look offensive) sentences, i
don't
think this is intenti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> I think MCC2 should just be seen as an experiment until there is
> enough done that it actually looks like a usable tool. Even the
> planning is just a fuzzy idea, no concrete plans yet.
I think this should be considered as valid. I'm in favor to
21 matches
Mail list logo
