Re: [Mageia-dev] The shiny new Control Center

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Steven Tucker wrote: > On 01/10/12 17:40, Angelo Naselli wrote: > >> >> Okay, so I am in favour of a new name, calling it mcc2 has already > caused confusion, so a new name more accurately portrays the program. Also > if Mageia were not to take it up, a more gene

Re: [Mageia-dev] The shiny new Control Center

generic graphical control center ? : ggcc On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Angelo Naselli wrote: > the real > question is how to call it :) > > I've thought for a while to generic control center, but I > think developers and packagers are not very happy to manage > the name conflicting with gcc

Re: [Mageia-dev] Mageia 3 alpha1

A trivial correction for the wiki page : The part saying "and finally our first official release planned in May." just before "More info about Mageia 3 development. " seems to be a leftover from the Mageia 1 release. It should be "and finally the o

Re: [Mageia-dev] Where is mageia bugzilla

https://bugs.mageia.org/ -- Frederic

Re: [Mageia-dev] Php : which package provides 'xmlrpc.inc' ?

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 17:08, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > > > (find / xmlrpc.inc gives nothing) > > > So the question is : which package provides 'xmlrpc.inc' ? > $ urpmf '/xmlrpc\.inc' > mmc-web-base:/usr/share/mmc/includes/xmlrpc.inc.php > tikiwiki:/usr/share/tikiwiki/lib/xmlrpc.inc > drupal:/

[Mageia-dev] Php : which package provides 'xmlrpc.inc' ?

I have a little php problem. I help for the xmlrpc calls for madb http://88.191.121.20/madb/master/index.php/?source=0&distrelease=8&application=1&arch=1 (which is in php), but am not familiar with php. I have tested different versions : first http://pear.php.net/package/XML_RPC2/ then http://code

Re: [Mageia-dev] New bugzilla proposal

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 17:49, andre999 wrote: > > Frederic Janssens a écrit : > >> >> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 06:19, andre999  wrote: >>> >>> >>> As for documentation and translations, a while back I suggested a similar >>> separation,

Re: [Mageia-dev] New bugzilla proposal

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 06:19, andre999 wrote: > > > As for documentation and translations, a while back I suggested a similar > separation, but on reflection I think it would be more useful to have flags : > > 1) problem with documentation (and not function) > These bugs would be best corrected b

Re: [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

On 2010-12-22, Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 22 December 2010 18:37, Frederic Janssens wrote: >> On 2010-12-22, Ahmad Samir wrote: >>> On 22 December 2010 01:32, Frederic Janssens wrote: >>>> First I think it would be usefull to have a multiline (Large Text Box) >

Re: [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

On 2010-12-22, Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 22 December 2010 01:32, Frederic Janssens wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 17:07, Michael Scherer wrote: >> >> In preparation of the future interaction (by xmlrpc) between the >> mageia-app-db site and the mageia bugzilla,

Re: [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

On 2010-12-22, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 00:32 +0100, Frederic Janssens a écrit : >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 17:07, Michael Scherer wrote: >> > >> > Le mardi 14 décembre 2010 à 17:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a écrit : >> > > I

Re: [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 17:07, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le mardi 14 décembre 2010 à 17:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a écrit : > > I would like to have your input to let us able to provide a bugzilla really > > soon > > So if I am not wrong, in bugzilla, we have : > - products > - component, containe

Re: [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 21:52, Renaud MICHEL > wrote: > I think it may work if those "bug friends" (don't remember who proposed > that > name) only take for themselves the simple, one package, software only bugs, > and suggest to the reporter to create himself a bugreport (eventually > providing

Re: [Mageia-dev] News about the forum

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 17:01, Maât wrote: > Le 04/10/2010 12:53, Frederic Janssens a écrit : > > good , can you advertise it, so I can exercise whith git ? > > I am all for git but have not used it much. > > > We will do better than that : we will share our improvements

Re: [Mageia-dev] News about the forum

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 09:08, Maât wrote: > Hi, > > We were prepared from start to have things to code for the forums. > > That's also why a true opensource engine was absolutely needed. > > That mean that we will not completely avoid to code some mods. > > For security and troll control/containm

Re: [Mageia-dev] News about the forum

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 00:14, Maât wrote: > > Nota: Fud has got the very cool mailing list bridge that we should set > up rather as soon as possible on the official board (but as already said > this feature still needs to be thought about, discussed by people and > heavily tested to avoid backfir

Re: [Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 00:43, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Yup, the distro that make you become expert, something like that. > > One thing we must not forget is that we need people that contribute if > we want to survive. A commercial distribution requires money ( and > therefore users that can bri