Le samedi 09 juillet 2011 à 14:46 +0200, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
I used the --with-man option of the %find_lang RPM macro, but noticed that it
adds all /usr/share/man/XX and /usr/share/man/XX/manX directories to the
package, which, it seems, is bad.
Spturtle noticed that for example
Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le samedi 09 juillet 2011 à 14:46 +0200, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
I used the --with-man option of the %find_lang RPM macro, but noticed that it
adds all /usr/share/man/XX and /usr/share/man/XX/manX directories to the
package, which, it seems, is bad.
Spturtle
Le samedi 9 juillet 2011 14:46:14, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
I used the --with-man option of the %find_lang RPM macro, but noticed that
it adds all /usr/share/man/XX and /usr/share/man/XX/manX directories to
the package, which, it seems, is bad.
Spturtle noticed that for example
Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
I used the --with-man option of the %find_lang RPM macro, but noticed that it
adds all /usr/share/man/XX and /usr/share/man/XX/manX directories to the
package, which, it seems, is bad.
Spturtle noticed that for example /usr/share/man/sr belongs to no other
package
I used the --with-man option of the %find_lang RPM macro, but noticed that it
adds all /usr/share/man/XX and /usr/share/man/XX/manX directories to the
package, which, it seems, is bad.
Spturtle noticed that for example /usr/share/man/sr belongs to no other
package and prefers that it belongs
Le samedi 9 juillet 2011 14:46:14, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
I used the --with-man option of the %find_lang RPM macro, but noticed that
it adds all /usr/share/man/XX and /usr/share/man/XX/manX directories to
the package, which, it seems, is bad.
Spturtle noticed that for example
