On 12/01/12 17:47, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2012/1/12 Marja van Waes:
On 12/01/12 15:48, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2012/1/12 Marja van Waes:
Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it
says:
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and
religion...
2012/1/12 Marja van Waes :
> On 12/01/12 15:48, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>>
>> 2012/1/12 Marja van Waes:
>>>
>>> Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it
>>> says:
>>> Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and
>>> religion...
>>>
>>> http://en.wi
On 12/01/12 15:48, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2012/1/12 Marja van Waes:
Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it
says:
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Artic
2012/1/12 Marja van Waes :
>
> Moreover, in article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it
> says:
> Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_18
Yes, so why do you deny thes
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Marja van Waes wrote:
>
> It is evident from what maât wrote, that he is convinced the edit time
> should stay very limited. Why do we ignore the universal declaration of
> human rights and try to force him to do something that is against his
> conscience?
Because it's Mag
On 11/01/12 21:13, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Marja van Waes wrote:
I can't talk for that minority, of course. However, I can talk for myself:
In such circumstances it is very possible that I'd agree to do something to
later find out I can't concentrate on the task no matter ho
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:13, nicolas vigier wrote:
> The main problem is that there seems to be a majority of
> people who think it should be enabled, that there is no good reason to
> not do it, or at least try it for a few months (as was proposed several
> times by different people), but it is
2012/1/11 Maarten Vanraes :
> Op woensdag 11 januari 2012 21:13:50 schreef nicolas vigier:
> [...]
>> But the main problem is not edit time, I don't really care about edit
>> time myself. The main problem is that there seems to be a majority of
>> people who think it should be enabled, that there i
Op woensdag 11 januari 2012 21:13:50 schreef nicolas vigier:
[...]
> But the main problem is not edit time, I don't really care about edit
> time myself. The main problem is that there seems to be a majority of
> people who think it should be enabled, that there is no good reason to
> not do it, or
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Marja van Waes wrote:
>
> I can't talk for that minority, of course. However, I can talk for myself:
>
> In such circumstances it is very possible that I'd agree to do something to
> later find out I can't concentrate on the task no matter how hard I try.
>
> I regret it wasn
On 11/01/12 10:54, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2012/1/11 Marja van Waes:
On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
Hi everyone,
Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
IMHO the best way in this case here would be a mod writte
Am 11.01.2012 10:54, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
> 2012/1/11 Marja van Waes :
>> On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>>> 2012/1/3 Michael Scherer:
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
> Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
>> Le
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 10:54:58 schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
> Why? IMHO this complete issue is going out of proportions. Let's
> remember why we *seem to need* this MOD in the first place. And what
> will we find? The time-to-edit discussion, again. In the council
> meeting where it was decide
2012/1/11 Marja van Waes :
> On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>>
>> 2012/1/3 Michael Scherer:
>>>
>>> Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
>
> Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100
On 03/01/12 10:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2012/1/3 Michael Scherer:
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
Hi everyone,
Can someone please
> 2012/1/3 Michael Scherer :
[...]
>> I was more thinking of proper patchs or better, proper modules, with
>> files to deploy in a well know directory .
>
> I only gave a part of an example. MODs are made as enhancement to the
> standard software. The easiest MOD is like Michael wrote: "a module
>
2012/1/3 Michael Scherer :
> Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
>> Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
>> > Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > >
>> > > Can someone please help to fix bug 1
Op dinsdag 03 januari 2012 00:46:39 schreef Michael Scherer:
[...]
> Something that do not remind me of Alien 4 movie.
hey now! no insulting :-) that's a great movie! a bit of a mess at times, but
a great movie!
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 22:17 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
> Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
> > Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
> > >
> > > You don't need
Op maandag 02 januari 2012 21:40:31 schreef Michael Scherer:
> Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
> >
> > You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.
> >
> > We need someone to find and implement a
Le lundi 02 janvier 2012 à 19:41 +0100, Marja van Waes a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
>
> You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.
>
> We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD, needed
> to keep forum posts history when unlimited
Hi everyone,
Can someone please help to fix bug 1956?
You don't need to be a regular forum visitor.
We need someone to find and implement a probably existing MOD, needed
to keep forum posts history when unlimited edit time is enabled
From wobo's comment #32:
Capabilities needed:
Well, one
22 matches
Mail list logo
