'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 04/06/12 19:06 did gyre and gimble:
I value(d) this option and think that replacing it with whatever
mechanism is necessary would be an asset to Mageia, whereas I now view
it's lack of function as a loss.
Did you check what I wrote tho'? Did you try
On Sunday, 3 June 2012 17:52:47 Colin Guthrie wrote:
On the whole, this kind of security is basically bullshit anyway.
You can't make that assessment without understanding the rest of the security
environment.
It
might make things a tiny bit harder, but if you can get into the
bootloader to
I'm in full agreement, however the point of my initial post was not to
obtain an evaluation of the merits of being able to, as part of the
install as was the case in versions previous to system D, but to ask if
a mechanism, providing the same function as was previously available,
through msec
I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
level of security as HIGH, that I am permitted entry into the system in
Linux Single mode without a challenge password, which is a new, and IMHO
undesirable, behavior from previous versions.
Is this a new feature, or
On 03.06.2012 14:27, Richard Couture wrote:
I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
level of security as HIGH, that I am permitted entry into the system in
Linux Single mode without a challenge password, which is a new, and IMHO
undesirable, behavior from
I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
the point?
Richard
On 06/03/2012 06:30 AM, Jani Välimaa wrote:
On 03.06.2012 14:27, Richard Couture wrote:
I notice that when, at the end of the
2012/6/3 Richard Couture r...@linuxcabal.org:
I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing the
point?
I don't see a hijacked thread either.
--
wobo
Richard
On 06/03/2012 06:30 AM, Jani
Le 03/06/2012 13:40, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing the
point?
I don't see a hijacked thread either.
Replaying on a different thread instead of creating a new one.
On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
the point?
New and unique subject isn't always enough. There's still some headers
from message which you
2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa jani.vali...@gmail.com:
On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
the point?
New and unique subject isn't always enough.
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 14:04:07 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa jani.vali...@gmail.com:
On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
2012/6/3 AL13N al...@rmail.be:
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 14:04:07 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa jani.vali...@gmail.com:
On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
unique Subject, How is that considered
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 15:17:28 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
[...]
it's Anne's mail with subject: [Mageia-dev] Mageia 2 and Cauldron updated
with proper design
Ok, I received that. Conclusion:
My mail client (Googlemail online) does not honor references, splits
threads by subject only. New
'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 03/06/12 12:27 did gyre and gimble:
I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
level of security as HIGH, that I am permitted entry into the system in
Linux Single mode without a challenge password, which is a new, and IMHO
2012/6/3 Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie:
'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 03/06/12 12:27 did gyre and gimble:
I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
level of security as HIGH, that I am permitted entry into the system in
Linux Single mode without a
'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 03/06/12 17:12 did gyre and gimble:
2012/6/3 Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie:
'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 03/06/12 12:27 did gyre and gimble:
I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
level of security as HIGH,
2012/6/3 Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie:
'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 03/06/12 17:12 did gyre and gimble:
2012/6/3 Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie:
'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 03/06/12 12:27 did gyre and gimble:
I notice that when, at the end of the installation of
On 2012/06/03 17:46 (GMT+0100) Colin Guthrie composed:
/etc/inittab is no longer used or read.
For single user mode now-a-days we boot to rescue.target (this is done
automatically if you just put a 1 at the end of the kernel command line
to support runlevel 1).
where do I change
On Sunday 03 June 2012 19:09, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012/06/03 17:46 (GMT+0100) Colin Guthrie composed:
/etc/inittab is no longer used or read.
For real men (and women), we just change the
/etc/systemd/system/default.target symlink to point at whatever target
we want to use by default.
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 18:49:04 schreef Johnny A. Solbu:
[...]
I agree with Felix, this is not a good change.
I'm sure there is a perfectly valid ans sound reason for changig it, but
there's a difference in changing it for the better and changing it for the
worse. This is a bad change.
[...]
I
On Sunday 03 June 2012 20:16, AL13N wrote:
it's not even a change, it's systemd vs sysvinit.
That may be so, but it is still a change.
if you don't like it, you can still switch back to sysvinit,
I don't have to like it to use it. :-)=
--
Johnny A. Solbu
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
03.06.2012 20:49, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
Editing a text file to change a number, eg. from 5 to 3, is much easier
to remember than changing a symlink to
/lib/systemd/system/runlevel3.target, especially when explaning this to a
not so advanced user over the phone, who doesn't have a
AL13N wrote earlier:
For some of you, stuff you've known for ages is worthless now and you go back
to being a noob (for this sort of thing) and will have to relearn a different
way.
The change here is new and needs a different way, yes. Nothing against
that. But the same result has been
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 20:57:41 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
AL13N wrote earlier:
For some of you, stuff you've known for ages is worthless now and you go
back to being a noob (for this sort of thing) and will have to relearn a
different way.
The change here is new and needs a different way,
Sander Lepik wrote:
03.06.2012 20:49, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
Editing a text file to change a number, eg. from 5 to 3, is much easier
to remember than changing a symlink to
/lib/systemd/system/runlevel3.target, especially when explaning this to a not
so advanced user over the phone, who
'Twas brillig, and Johnny A. Solbu at 03/06/12 18:49 did gyre and gimble:
On Sunday 03 June 2012 19:09, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012/06/03 17:46 (GMT+0100) Colin Guthrie composed:
/etc/inittab is no longer used or read.
For real men (and women), we just change the
'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 03/06/12 21:54 did gyre and gimble:
Sander Lepik wrote:
03.06.2012 20:49, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
Editing a text file to change a number, eg. from 5 to 3, is much easier
to remember than changing a symlink to
/lib/systemd/system/runlevel3.target,
27 matches
Mail list logo
