On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:03:35PM +0300, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> There actually only the unity packages needed to be compile against it
> (which is no problem compile only these programs
> against this patched gtk3 with a separate OBS project for unity :) )
Pretty sure you have that incorrect. All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 14/09/2012 21:03, Damian Ivanov ha scritto:
> There actually only the unity packages needed to be compile against
> it (which is no problem compile only these programs against this
> patched gtk3 with a separate OBS project for unity :) )
>
hmm bu
There actually only the unity packages needed to be compile against it
(which is no problem compile only these programs
against this patched gtk3 with a separate OBS project for unity :) )
2012/9/14 Pacho Ramos :
> El vie, 14-09-2012 a las 09:06 +0200, Damian Ivanov escribió:
>> > Could both gtk+
El vie, 14-09-2012 a las 09:06 +0200, Damian Ivanov escribió:
> > Could both gtk+ versions be parallel instalable? (to keep using official
> > gtk+ for most applications but those requiring ubuntu patches)
> No, ubuntu patches patch actual files, it would not be possible to
> have gtk2 + gtk2-modul
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:03:46PM +0200, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> It's just people "upstream" even denying things that are optional.
Just because a patch exists doesn't mean it is always ok to apply it
upstream.
>From what I understood most of these patches are optional anyway.
Further, I don't se
>Better reasons than "all my friends have it".
Like in the last email, let's forget this argument and there are kick
ass reasons see previous mails,
It has a reason Mandriva searching for a new build system. And it
wouldn't be a start at step 1. It is an already
working alternative.
2012/9/14 Johnny A. Solbu :
> On Friday 14 September 2012 14:03, Damian Ivanov wrote:
>> - OBS is the most widely-used build system
>
> In my view, that's not a good argument. The fact that most people do one
> thing does not mean that we should do it.
>
> I remember I used to use the same argumen
Here it is not like omg, I want to have my new toy, everybody has it.It is
wow lots of entreprise users reporting bugs. But ok, let's ignore that
point, there are other points.
;)
On Sep 14, 2012 6:54 PM, "Johnny A. Solbu" wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2012 14:03, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> > - OBS
On Friday 14 September 2012 14:03, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> - OBS is the most widely-used build system
In my view, that's not a good argument. The fact that most people do one thing
does not mean that we should do it.
I remember I used to use the same argument when agruing with my mother when I
w
Hi Colin,
Thanks for you're answer!
> The "Here is my PPA where I do x, y and z" style approach to software
> repositories is always one we've deliberately avoided. It's creates
> significant problems for our (relatively) small teams when doing QA and
> addressing bug reports.
Agreed, I'm quite s
Hi Damian,
'Twas brillig, and Damian Ivanov at 12/09/12 11:33 did gyre and gimble:
> My name is Damian Ivanov. Xiao-Long Chen and me are the maintainers of
> unity desktop environment for openSUSE and Fedora
Thanks for writing and getting in touch!
It's certainly an interesting proposal, but it'
> Could both gtk+ versions be parallel instalable? (to keep using official
> gtk+ for most applications but those requiring ubuntu patches)
No, ubuntu patches patch actual files, it would not be possible to
have gtk2 + gtk2-module-ubuntu
El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 22:37 +0200, Damian Ivanov escribió:
> There are lots of good reasons to switch to OBS
>- OBS has a web interface ( lots of ppl including me do lot of
> the spec file editing, patching etc. using the web interface from
> windows e.g from work PC / mobile platforms)
>
> I'd rather have developers that actually use the distro they build for and
> test the fixes themselves too.
Oh, I use it on all my three private PC's
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_comparison
http://blog.mandriva.com/en/2011/07/19/we-start-collecting-wishes-for-new-build-system/
13.09.2012 23:37, Damian Ivanov skrev:
There are lots of good reasons to switch to OBS
- OBS has a web interface ( lots of ppl including me do lot of
the spec file editing, patching etc. using the web interface from
windows e.g from work PC / mobile platforms)
I'd rather have developers tha
There are lots of good reasons to switch to OBS
- OBS has a web interface ( lots of ppl including me do lot of
the spec file editing, patching etc. using the web interface from
windows e.g from work PC / mobile platforms)
- In OBS it's very easy to fix a package for everyone, if you have
an a
13.09.2012 23:08, Damian Ivanov skrev:
You mean using opensuse build system?
Absolutely.
As far as i can say adding the availability to build also mageia
packages could be a good thing.
I think best would even be Mageia being build by OBS itself as whole
distribution.
Why? We already have
Hi,
> all that glitters is not gold... It's very hard to have a unique
> spec file, rpm macros, package names, etc are often if not always
> different, but i see some good things following libyui project...
I dind't say a unique spec file, the only things that differs are the
macros and the Requir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> it should be even more safe than directly in the distribution. 4
> distri maintainers watching the same sources and patches and one
> place.
all that glitters is not gold... It's very hard to have a unique
spec file, rpm macros, package names, et
> You mean using opensuse build system?
Absolutely.
> As far as i can say adding the availability to build also mageia
> packages could be a good thing.
I think best would even be Mageia being build by OBS itself as whole
distribution.
> As far as user concerned though, using different repositori
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 13/09/2012 14:08, Damian Ivanov ha scritto:
> I am not talking yet about getting unity included in Mageia, but
> to have the repo that is available for openSUSE and Fedora users
> available for Mageia too. Add repo ==> Update ==> install unity
You
I'm afraid that there's not much chance of people from mageia contributing if
it's not included in mageia itself.
wrt to mageia itself, while policies are important, (and certainly we can't
just patch away), the work must be maintained by someone, and more patches ==
more work to get it maintai
I am not talking yet about getting unity included in Mageia, but to
have the repo that is available for openSUSE and Fedora users
available for Mageia too. Add repo ==> Update ==> install unity
> Well mentoring is important, users also but if there are zillions patches on
> core GNOME it's another
Le 13/09/2012 14:02, Claire Robinson a écrit :
On 12/09/12 22:53, JA Magallón wrote:
On 09/12/2012 10:05 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
My name isDamian Ivanov. Xiao-Long Chen and me are the maintainers of
unity desktop environment for openSUSE and Fedora, Xiao-Long
additionally maintains
also unity
On 12/09/12 22:53, JA Magallón wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 10:05 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
My name isDamian Ivanov. Xiao-Long Chen and me are the maintainers of
unity desktop environment for openSUSE and Fedora, Xiao-Long
additionally maintains
also unity on Arch Linux. We use fo
On 09/12/2012 10:05 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
My name isDamian Ivanov. Xiao-Long Chen and me are the maintainers of
unity desktop environment for openSUSE and Fedora, Xiao-Long
additionally maintains
also unity on Arch Linux. We use for building the packages the open
build service https://build.o
Hi,
You can easily review it here:
https://build.opensuse.org/project/packages?project=GNOME%3AAyatana
But to sum it up, for packages that are packaged in evert (normal)
distribution we made packages %name-ubuntu
so e.g for gtk3 we have a package gtk3-ubuntu which Provides and Obsoletes gtk3.
But
El mié, 12-09-2012 a las 12:33 +0200, Damian Ivanov escribió:
> Hi,
>
>
> My name isDamian Ivanov. Xiao-Long Chen and me are the maintainers of
> unity desktop environment for openSUSE and Fedora, Xiao-Long
> additionally maintains
> also unity on Arch Linux. We use for building the packages the
Hi,
My name isDamian Ivanov. Xiao-Long Chen and me are the maintainers of unity
desktop environment for openSUSE and Fedora, Xiao-Long additionally
maintains
also unity on Arch Linux. We use for building the packages the open build
service https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?project=GNOME%3
29 matches
Mail list logo
