On Mon Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I'm sensing a theme. I think for this stuff we should prune fairly
> aggressively, then add back in places once we have a need.
+1
Isabel
I'm sensing a theme. I think for this stuff we should prune fairly
aggressively, then add back in places once we have a need.
On Jan 10, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>> Nuke it if you don't use it.
>>
>
> +1 to this
>
> -jak
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Nuke it if you don't use it.
>
+1 to this
-jake
Nuke it if you don't use it.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Personally, I'd be inclined to nuke the entire API. It's implemented
> as the obvious iteration, and the caller can iterate for themselves
> without creating a shoot-yourself opportunity for the unwary.
>
> An
Colt code is inconsistent in dealing with the following case:
iIntSomethingHashMap.keyOf(someValue)
Some code we got from them returns 0 if there is no such value, other
code returns MIN_VALUE. In floating-point land, it returns NAN.
Personally, I'd be inclined to nuke the entire API. It's impl
