Joshua Cranmer writes:
On 10/24/2011 8:04 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 11:41 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
There's movement afoot to deprecate use of X- in header field
names. Just call it Mailman-Topic. And if it's worthwhile,
consider registering it with IANA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:step...@xemacs.org]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 10:38 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: Ian Eiloart; mailman-developers@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs
The success of the IETF RFC
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:step...@xemacs.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:50 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: mailman-developers@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs
I agree, and have no objection to advocacy,
* Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org:
Joshua Cranmer writes:
On 10/24/2011 8:04 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 11:41 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
There's movement afoot to deprecate use of X- in header field
names. Just call it Mailman-Topic. And if it's
Patrick Ben Koetter writes:
Is it possible to register a prefix (namespace) such as mailman-. Anything
below would be mailman related. Stupid idea?
Very plausible, but I suspect there are good reasons not to allow it
in the RFC 822/1036 messaging series. In any case, no, it's not
possible.
-Original Message-
From: mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org
[mailto:mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org] On
Behalf Of Stephen J. Turnbull
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 6:04 AM
To: Patrick Ben Koetter
Cc: mailman-developers@python.org
On 10/25/11 6:00 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:step...@xemacs.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:50 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: mailman-developers@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs
I
-Original Message-
From: mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org
[mailto:mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark@python.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Damon
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:27 AM
To: mailman-developers@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers]
Murray S. Kucherawy writes:
What it says is the list should re-sign if it modifies the message
(or, in general, re-sign anyway). So append whatever you want,
just re-sign the message. Are you insisting that advice is
defective?
Defective, maybe not.
But I don't think I would follow it
On 10/25/2011 2:47 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Joshua Cranmer writes:
On 10/24/2011 8:04 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 11:41 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
There's movement afoot to deprecate use of X- in header field
names. Just call it Mailman-Topic.
Dear Mailman fellows,
just a short update in terms of the WebUI - we all know that the
targeted release date is now only a little bit more than two weeks to go
- @Barry 11.11.2011 is still the target ?
Regarding the WebUI development we promissed you to show of at least the
results from GSOC
Is there any particular design issue you'd like me to raise for the Mailman 3
web ui or archive ui? There isn't much time to put this together, but I'm
willing to do that if there's something worthwhile to have them discuss.
If not, I might bring up a MM2 archive issue perhaps.
-Barry
Begin
Anything they can do with mm2 archives will help us make the mm3 ones
better! I'd say they're highest priority since it affects the most
people, but I'd also like to see better design applied to our admin
pages, which can be quite painful to navigate...
On 10/25/11 11:32, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:58:35PM +0200, Benedict Stein wrote:
To be honest - at least for me it's the first day really taking a look
at mailman after finishing GSOC, but I'm sure we'll all do our best to
get this thing up and running.
Thanks! It'll be appreciated.
--
If you see a long line
14 matches
Mail list logo
