On 12-09-17 11:39 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Terri Oda writes:
> That said, I'm tentatively planning a personal postorious hackathon all
> day Saturday the 22nd. If anyone wants to join me, I'll be on #mailman
> on freenode!
I don't think I can join but maybe Could you be a bit
Terri Oda writes:
> That said, I'm tentatively planning a personal postorious hackathon all
> day Saturday the 22nd. If anyone wants to join me, I'll be on #mailman
> on freenode!
I don't think I can join but maybe Could you be a bit more
specific than "all day" (especially time zone)
On 12-09-17 1:12 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
I think if we release MM3 without 'a frontend' we will miss people's
expectation to get a feature complete MLM - which includes a frontend
in most peoples opinion I guess.
I do think that if we release them separately, we'll have to be very clear
Bob Puff@NLE writes:
> I don't want more servers (processes). I need secure,
> low-footprint, low cpu-utilization processes.
You're not going to get more processes unless you want them. The
processes currently planned are just called "runners" now, and will be
less coupled than currently.
Whe
I've been in lurk mode for quite some time, but I have to throw in my $0.02. As an admin of several
busy servers, and mailman lists that send out close to a million emails per week, I can say that I
don't have the time to deal with trying to create a new interface. I made my own cheat sheet of h
Barry Warsaw writes:
> Currently, JSON is the only supported output format. I'd be open to patches
> that provide other output formats.
Please, no. "Filters are one honking great idea. Let's do more of
those!"
I think most of the interesting programming languages people might
write Mailman
Patrick Ben Koetter writes:
> I think if we release MM3 without 'a frontend' we will miss
> people's expectation to get a feature complete MLM - which includes
> a frontend in most peoples opinion I guess.
I agree on the basis of introspection (which is obviously a
statistically biased sample)
* Barry Warsaw :
> On Sep 16, 2012, at 01:41 PM, Adam McGreggor wrote:
>
> >Part of the attraction in using Mailman 2, was that, for the majority
> >of tasks end-users want to do, they can do it via the web interface;
> >certainly an advantage over those "you have to do everything by email,
> >in
Hi,
On 09/17/2012 04:50 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Maybe now that the core is pretty close to what it will be like when released,
we can get more volunteers to help test Postorius, and perhaps contribute to
it? It would be cool if we could do a simultaneous release, but OTOH, the
architecture of M
> Is there any chance you could push this to Launchpad as a branch?
Sure. I've pushed it to Launchpad and filed a merge proposal.
Cheers,
Aurélien
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Sep 17, 2012, at 05:06 PM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>Please tell me what you think of it, if and where it needs some more work.
Is there any chance you could push this to Launchpad as a branch? Patches in
email threads are easily missed.
Cheers,
-Barry
Hi Mailmaners,
Here's a version of the "external configuration files" patch. As Barry
suggested, it adds a "configure" entry in the archiver's section,
which can point to an ini-compatible configuration file (ConfigParser
is used) for additional archiver-specific configuration.
I've migrated the e
On Sep 15, 2012, at 06:48 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>Is there any output format available other than json?
Currently, JSON is the only supported output format. I'd be open to patches
that provide other output formats.
-Barry
___
Mailman-Developers maili
On Sep 16, 2012, at 01:41 PM, Adam McGreggor wrote:
>Part of the attraction in using Mailman 2, was that, for the majority
>of tasks end-users want to do, they can do it via the web interface;
>certainly an advantage over those "you have to do everything by email,
>in the proscribed manner, to the
14 matches
Mail list logo
