> "DM" == Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> Sigh. This isn't making life any easier trying to debug the
DM> "Archiver eats my machine" problem:
DM> self._open_index_file_as_stdout(arcdir, hdr)
DM> Any tricks for using pdb with a program that wants to steal
Here's a patch that eliminates the MailList object from the article
index pickle. It also undoes the incomplete hack in MailList for not
pickling the lock object (that should have been a major clue).
I've done some moderate testing of this patch, and I think it's safe,
and probably fixes the maj
Dan found what is probably the majority of the problem. In the i18n
patch, Article instances in HyperArch.py grew an _mlist instance so
that means a unique instance of the MailList is pickled and unpickled
in every Article in the archive. Ug.
I'm working on a fix for that and will see about the
Sigh. This isn't making life any easier trying to debug the "Archiver eats
my machine" problem:
self._open_index_file_as_stdout(arcdir, hdr)
Any tricks for using pdb with a program that wants to steal
stdout?
(it's the first invocation of _update_simple_index, the one
for the Date inde
Dan Mick wrote:
Barry, wasn't there some Python instrumentation trick for using the GC
to find unreferenced objects and complain, or invoking GC manually in
a loop to try to alleviate such problems?was it in the gc module?...
Adding this:
--- /usr/local/src/mailman/Mailman/Archiver/piperm
Dan Mick wrote:
Simone Piunno wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:03:50PM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
The problem's affecting me badly right now too. So far it seems that
the holdup is in the 'date.html' index file processing; everything
else is finished, but the "bin/qrunner -r Arch -o" process
Simone Piunno wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:03:50PM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
The problem's affecting me badly right now too. So far it seems that the
holdup is in the 'date.html' index file processing; everything else is
finished, but the "bin/qrunner -r Arch -o" process has lost its littl
From: "Simone Piunno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The problem's affecting me badly right now too. So far it seems that
the
> Ok, I believe this is because of my patch for i18n in archives.
> Do you feel like trying this patch?
> It should speed up things a lot
> Index: HyperArch.py
> ==
From: "Dan Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> > A quick fix for the Archiver problems, until I can debug them more is
> > to add the following in ArchRunner.py, just under the "class
> > ArchRunner" line:
> The problem's affecting me badly right now too. So far it seems that th
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:03:50PM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
> The problem's affecting me badly right now too. So far it seems that the
> holdup is in the 'date.html' index file processing; everything else is
> finished, but the "bin/qrunner -r Arch -o" process has lost its little mind
> trying t
Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
A quick fix for the Archiver problems, until I can debug them more is
to add the following in ArchRunner.py, just under the "class
ArchRunner" line:
class ArchRunner(Runner):
QDIR = mm_cfg.ARCHQUEUE_DIR
SLEEPTIME = mm_cfg.minutes(10)
def _dispose(self, mlist, m
From: "Barry A. Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A quick fix for the Archiver problems, until I can debug them more is
> to add the following in ArchRunner.py, just under the "class
> ArchRunner" line:
Thanx, i'll try that tomorrow. (Now here 22:39)
I'll let you know what then happens :)
Danny.
A quick fix for the Archiver problems, until I can debug them more is
to add the following in ArchRunner.py, just under the "class
ArchRunner" line:
class ArchRunner(Runner):
QDIR = mm_cfg.ARCHQUEUE_DIR
SLEEPTIME = mm_cfg.minutes(10)
def _dispose(self, mlist, msg, msgdata):
This at
From: "Andrew D. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've had the same problem. ArchRunner seems to have serious performance
> problems if you've got heavy list activity and are archiving to both
> pipermail and mbox. I "fixed" it by setting ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX=1. This will
> only archive to mbox, so your
I've had the same problem. ArchRunner seems to have serious performance
problems if you've got heavy list activity and are archiving to both
pipermail and mbox. I "fixed" it by setting ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX=1. This will
only archive to mbox, so your pipermail archives won't be updated. You
should
15 matches
Mail list logo
