Barry Warsaw wrote:
So that no hacking is required to make it something the user can
see and modify. We'd still be doing the dangerous thing by leaving
it set to default off (in the case of Linux), but at least we
wouldn't be requiring that they hack the code in order to be able to
tweak thi
I've noticed some weird happenings with Mailman (v-2.1.2). As expected
on the first of each month all the log files get rolled over (so vette
becomes vette.1 and bounce becomes bounce.1, etc). Every so often I see
files that are created but are not used. For instance, I'm looking at
my log direc
Greetings,
I'm new to Mailman development, so bear with me. I didn't see
anything in the archives addressing this, but my searches weren't
too complex.
There's probably good reason for this design, but why have
multiple dicts within the MailList infrastructure duplicating
the subscriber list?
On Thursday 09 October 2003 17:24, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I've thought about this some more, and I'm going to reverse the decision
> not to expose SYNC_AFTER_WRITE in mm_cfg.py. Apologies for being so
> hard-headed about it.
While you're at it, I would expose STEALTH_MODE too (in scripts/driver),
You didn't say on what type and version the system is, which is
important because things like log file rollovers aren't really part of
mailman proper but rather are done as part of the system specific
installation. I do know that for a while we (Red Hat) had a bug with log
file rotation in our RPM,
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 14:24, Andrew A. Raines wrote:
> There's probably good reason for this design, but why have
> multiple dicts within the MailList infrastructure duplicating
> the subscriber list?
It's completely historical and indicates the accretive nature of the
user database. E.g. we di
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 14:39, Simone Piunno wrote:
> On Thursday 09 October 2003 17:24, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > I've thought about this some more, and I'm going to reverse the decision
> > not to expose SYNC_AFTER_WRITE in mm_cfg.py. Apologies for being so
> > hard-headed about it.
>
> While yo
I'm looking at using Mailman to distribute a multipart Text / HTML email message. The
Text message is displayed for Text only email viewers and the HTML message is
displayed for HTML capable email viewers. I'm using a separate CGI script to create
the multipart email message which is then sent t
Hello,
We use Mailman 2.1.2 and I am curious if there is a way to set a maximum
number of addresses that are allowed in each individual list. I have looked
through the documentation and have not seen anything regarding a limit like
this. Or, if this is currently not supported in Mailman, has
Hi,
When I post digested article from gnus on a mailman mailing list
I get this error in :
---[/var/spool/mailman/logs/error]---
Oct 03 22:16:06 2003 (30348) Uncaught runner exception: 'list' object has no attribute
'splitlines'
Oct 03 22:16:06 2003 (30348) Traceback (most recent call last):
F
For a huge list like http://www.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl/ (104MB),
being able to download the raw archive is a blessing. For those
newsgroups which have (hallelujah) Mailman versions, this means
no more fiddling with infernal newsreader features.
Just:
1. Fetch huge archive efficiently your favor
I am thinking of adapting a collapsible, outlinable, no-page
refresh, on-demand message-body load browser-based message
thread interface I made (see http://www.neotitans.com/page.gif)
to work with GNU Mailman (among other things) lists.
Ideally, I would like it to function as a 'www-interface
gatew
I saw a person post this error before, as message msg06414.html, however it
was never replied to. I am running mailman 2.1.3, on darwin 6.6, with
sendmail and python 2.3.2. EVERY message that hits a mailing list generates
an error like the following:
Oct 06 13:54:06 2003 (3023) lost data files
Hi everyone,
I know someone must have asked this already but I can't find anything on
the subject.
Nowadays (as AMK clearly says on his page) pipermail only lives within
Mailman. Is it possible, however, to use it by itself?
I.e. I'd have to provide a nicer interface to a set of messages which
Is there a way to Mass Subscribe users with email address AND names?
-Trevor
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 16:25, Wendt, Trevor wrote:
> I'm looking at using Mailman to distribute a multipart Text / HTML email message.
> The Text message is displayed for Text only email viewers and the HTML message is
> displayed for HTML capable email viewers. I'm using a separate CGI script to
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 13:55, Jerry Spaulding wrote:
> I saw a person post this error before, as message msg06414.html, however it
> was never replied to. I am running mailman 2.1.3, on darwin 6.6, with
> sendmail and python 2.3.2. EVERY message that hits a mailing list generates
> an error like
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 14:53, Wendt, Trevor wrote:
> Is there a way to Mass Subscribe users with email address AND names?
Yes, just add lines like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anne Person)
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 13:58, Chris Szilagyi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use Mailman 2.1.2 and I am curious if there is a way to set a maximum
> number of addresses that are allowed in each individual list. I have looked
> through the documentation and have not seen anything regarding a limit like
>
Great. Thanks you.
-Trevor
-Original Message-
From: Barry Warsaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Wendt, Trevor
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mass Subscriptions
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 14:53, Wendt, Trevor wrote:
> Is there
logrotate has a problem with MM 2.1.x because the qrunners operate a
daemons and as a consequence do not close the files they are logging
to. This leads to the problem you are observing. This is not a problem
with MM alone. Anything that runs as a damon typically has to be HUP'ed
after the rota
At 11:59 AM +0800 2003/10/04, Andy Sy wrote:
Is making the archive rsync'able a responsibility of the
list administrator
Yes. It's a file. That level of control should be left to the
OS and how you configure standard tools like rsync or ssync.
or... wouldn't it be better
At 5:10 PM +0800 2003/10/05, Andy Sy wrote:
I. Which mbox index / mail summary file format to use?
Import into Berkeley DB hash tables. Fast, easy, well-supported
by many languages, robust, data can easily be extracted if necessary,
and they can easily be reconstructed if necessary.
Failing
--- John Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You didn't say on what type and version the system is, which is
> important because things like log file rollovers aren't really part of
> mailman proper but rather are done as part of the system specific
Sorry about that. I'm on a debian box running '
At 5:34 PM -0700 2003/10/09, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
Nothing looked out of place to me. The file is being created correctly,
I'm just surprised that mailman would even touch a non-existent as far as
its concerned (mailman know not about post.1 and logrotate) unless the
file-handler is kept in a
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 14:50, Peter C. Norton wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 05:56:00PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 17:40, Harald Meland wrote:
> > > Hence, I think it makes more sense to have the default be "do
> > > fsync(2)", and let any performance-conscious site decid
I have posted a new enhancement patch for MM 2.1.3 to sourceforge.
The Mailman/pipermail/MHonArc integration patch tightly integrates the
MHonArc mail-to-HTML convertor with Mailman and its internal pipermail
archiving code.
The purpose of the patch is to produce a fusion of (hopefully) the b
27 matches
Mail list logo
