--On 13 December 2005 19:38:46 -0600 Brad Knowles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could add a new "List-" header which would allow compliant
> MUAs to give users a single button to click on, but there are
> currently no MUAs that would support such a feature.
There is an extension to Th
> I've just been cleaning up a list that I administer and suddenly it came to
> me that we could have a report Scam/Spam button for such items being sent to
> Mailman lists.
Where would you have this button? In the admindb interface? In the post
itself somewhere?
> Would this be feasible? I know
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 14:33 +0200, Rui Correia wrote:
> I've just been cleaning up a list that I administer and suddenly it came to
> me that we could have a report Scam/Spam button for such items being sent to
> Mailman lists.
A long while ago, I did an experimental integration of Spambayes wit
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 16:38 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> I think you are talking about:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1008865&group_id=103&atid=300103
>
> Hopefully, we will be back to the MAIN CVS tree for the development of
> mailman-2.2 after the release of 2.1.7
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 10:21 +, Ian Eiloart wrote:
> There is an extension to Thunderbird which supports List- header URLs.
> Turns them into clickable links. I'm not sure whether it would work for a
> new List- header - it might look for only the RFC 2369 defined List-
> headers.
>
> Of co
I asked the Mailman-Users list this question last week, but got no
useful replies. Since this is a bug in the code, someone here might
know how to proceed.
I might add to the original question: Would it help to go to the very
latest Mailman release?
I'd like some help on
Hi,
Can you test attached patch in your system? My system accepts non-ascii
characters in logging and does not reproduce your error.
Edward Elhauge wrote:
I asked the Mailman-Users list this question last week, but got no
useful replies. Since this is a bug in the code, someone here might
kn
On 12/14/05 3:32 PM, "Barry Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do think mailman-developers
> is a reasonable place to discuss this. We can talk about whether it's
> even reasonable to have anti-spam defenses in Mailman, and if so whether
> we want to pick one such product to support, or have
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:55:30PM -0500, Joshua Ginsberg wrote:
> > Would this be feasible? I know gmail has such a feature - I don't
> > quite know the process it follows once it is reported.
>
> Ay. There's the rub. To whom would it be reported, and what might they
> do with it once reported?
