[Your original message probably didn't make it to mailman-developers
since it was spelled "mailman-de...@python.org" -BAW]
On Oct 10, 2009, at 4:19 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
2. A formal proposal of a new header field, Responses-To, whose sole
purpose is to allow mailing lists conform
Barry Warsaw writes:
> [Your original message probably didn't make it to mailman-developers
> since it was spelled "mailman-de...@python.org" -BAW]
Thanks.
> In general, I like Stephen's proposal as a way to help reduce the
> ambiguity in this very common workflow. I'll bikeshed on this
On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
It's not just list-specific, it's specifically for the use of lists,
not users. As such it seems reasonable to me that it would be
prefixed "List-".
As for going the RFC route, I think it's not a bad idea, but I have
no
idea how much w
Barry Warsaw writes:
> Perhaps a good place to start is to write up a draft on
> wiki.list.org?
Will do. Is there a good place to put it?
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailma
On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Barry Warsaw writes:
Perhaps a good place to start is to write up a draft on
wiki.list.org?
Will do. Is there a good place to put it?
I would start by putting it under Initiatives here:
http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Home
But rea
Since we're getting concrete here, redirecting to Mailman Developers.
Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I would start by putting it under Initiatives here:
>
> http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Home
>
> But really, we should have a separate pa
