Re: [Mailman-Developers] How hard would it be...
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 19:35, Roger Lynn wrote: ld be really nice if this could also somehow work to enable non-subscribers browsing the archives to reply to specific posts (as I am doing now). I've no idea how this could be done though. The mailto: link in the archived messages includes a message-id, which I assume is to enable threading to work properly when that message is replied to. Unfortunately it contains the message-id of the previous message, ie the one the message being read is in reply to, so this can't work. It appears to be intended to be used as the In-Reply-To header for the new message, which would be incorrect, unless I have misunderstood the reason for it being there (which is quite likely). I'd love to see something like this, although I admit that hacking new features into Pipermail is very low on my list of priorities. I (still) encourage someone in the community stepping forward to own Pipermail and either make improvements, or investigate replacements using Zest and ArchNG ideas. For Mailman 3, I'm open to almost any option for the archiver component. -Barry ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Re: [Mailman-Developers] How hard would it be...
On Wed 25 Jun 2003 at 23:21, Marty Galyean wrote: To put a button next to each message in the archives (labeled 'get'?) that when clicked causes MM to send that message to the logged in archive user as an email just as if it had been sent to them in non-digest mode? This would be a good way for people who have 'no-mail' or 'digest' set to reply occasionally to specific posts. And also to reply to a message the user has already deleted locally. It would be really nice if this could also somehow work to enable non-subscribers browsing the archives to reply to specific posts (as I am doing now). I've no idea how this could be done though. The mailto: link in the archived messages includes a message-id, which I assume is to enable threading to work properly when that message is replied to. Unfortunately it contains the message-id of the previous message, ie the one the message being read is in reply to, so this can't work. It appears to be intended to be used as the In-Reply-To header for the new message, which would be incorrect, unless I have misunderstood the reason for it being there (which is quite likely). Roger ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
[Mailman-Developers] How hard would it be...
To put a button next to each message in the archives (labeled 'get'?) that when clicked causes MM to send that message to the logged in archive user as an email just as if it had been sent to them in non-digest mode? This would be a good way for people who have 'no-mail' or 'digest' set to reply occasionally to specific posts. And also to reply to a message the user has already deleted locally. I'm assuming private archives that would require logging in so the email address would be handy, but even so, a detour to the log in form would not be a problem if necessary. I'd like to take a shot at this, but would like some pointers and suggestions so as not to go about it the wrong way. Any suggestions? Comments? Thanks, Marty ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
