On Mar 11, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Terri Oda wrote:
On 11-Mar-08, at 11:00 AM, Jason Pruim wrote:
I like this style when you have a smaller number of questions, but
there are probably over 200 entries in the the Mailman FAQ. I think
putting them all on one page is less than ideal:
(a) It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 11, 2008, at 1:37 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
That is correct. There were a few isinstance(something, str) calls in
HTMLFormatter.py and htmlformat.py that I added in 2.1.9. They're
still
there, and I don't know what other things I may have
On 11-Mar-08, at 11:00 AM, Jason Pruim wrote:
I can work on that... I already have a wiki account, and it looks
like I can edit pages... I would like to get some opinions on how
to do the FAQ's... I have some for my company website (Not related
to mailman) but what I did was a list of
On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:44 AM, Terri Oda wrote:
On 6-Mar-08, at 2:18 PM, Jason Pruim wrote:
I've been watching this thread with interest and would like to help
where I can... I don't know Python, so I can't exactly help program,
but I've been told I can translate technological info into
On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:03 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:08AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I think the GFDL would probably be more appropriate:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#FDL
I'm not as well versed on this license; what do people think about
that?
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
OTOH, the only real advantage to GFDL is that we can borrow from other
GFDLed docs. Do we want to do that?
YAGNI. Since our docs are already GPL'd, unless there's a reason to
switch or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~amk/mailman/small-fixes
I'll take a look tonight unless Mark beats me to it.
Actually, I found a few minutes to review this. The branch looks
good, +1 for
On Friday 7 March 2008 19:03, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
The major issue with the GFDL is that for a while, Debian considered
it to be a non-free license. I think the current status is that
Debian now considers GFDL-licensed docs with no unmodifiable sections
to be free, so we shouldn't have any
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:11:29PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Actually, I found a few minutes to review this. The branch looks
good, +1 for merging it to 2.1.
Should I do a push to the 2.1 branch, or will you or Mark pull it into
2.1?
(I think I have commit privileges at this point, but I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 10, 2008, at 1:03 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:11:29PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Actually, I found a few minutes to review this. The branch looks
good, +1 for merging it to 2.1.
Should I do a push to the 2.1
Barry Warsaw writes:
YAGNI. Since our docs are already GPL'd, unless there's a reason to
switch or dual license that overrides the hassle, let's just stick to
GPL.
Yay! Another victory for the Sanity in Free Software movement!
___
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:11:29PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Actually, I found a few minutes to review this. The branch looks
good, +1 for merging it to 2.1.
Should I do a push to the 2.1 branch, or will you or Mark pull it into
2.1?
(I think I have commit privileges
On 6-Mar-08, at 2:18 PM, Jason Pruim wrote:
I've been watching this thread with interest and would like to help
where I can... I don't know Python, so I can't exactly help program,
but I've been told I can translate technological info into something
the normal person could understand. So what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Warsaw wrote:
| On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:03 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
|
| * The README says Python 2.1 or later is required, but it looks like
|Python 2.3 is actually needed these days.
|
| Yep. Mark, correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 6, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Terri Oda wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5-Mar-08, at 5:26 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I like having docs in the wiki because it lets more people
contribute. The downside is that you can't reach
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:08AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I think the GFDL would probably be more appropriate:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#FDL
I'm not as well versed on this license; what do people think about that?
The major issue with the GFDL is that for a while, Debian
Barry Warsaw writes:
I think the GFDL would probably be more appropriate:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#FDL
I'm not as well versed on this license; what do people think about that?
Gratuitous license proliferation about sums it up.
The big problem with GFDL is that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5-Mar-08, at 5:26 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I like having docs in the wiki because it lets more people
contribute. The downside is that you can't reach it when you're
offline and it's harder to publish in alternative media. Have you
thought at
On Mar 6, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Terri Oda wrote:
Other docs I want to see in the wiki:
In my perfect world, I'd like to see us port all of our FAQ items to
the documentation part of the wiki, so all of these things could be
found in one place and thus easily searchable in one go. Any
What's the status of the Mailman documentation, and where is the
master copy now? The LaTeX source for the docs isn't in the Bazaar
repository, beyond a copy in the Japanese translation
(./messages/ja/doc/mailman-member.tex). The wiki page at
On 5-Mar-08, at 2:53 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
What's the status of the Mailman documentation, and where is the
master copy now? The LaTeX source for the docs isn't in the Bazaar
repository, beyond a copy in the Japanese translation
(./messages/ja/doc/mailman-member.tex). The wiki page at
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:53:21PM -0500, Terri Oda wrote:
The master latex file is probably the one on my hard drive/checked
into source control (uhh, it was in svn, but it might not have made
it to bazaar, in which case, that's my bad and I'll see what I can
do), ...
Thanks! Looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2008, at 2:53 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
What's the status of the Mailman documentation, and where is the
master copy now?
Hi Andrew,
The masters are in Bazaar but they're not in the main code
repository. I split them off, along with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Terri Oda wrote:
I should probably finish writing the docs, but I'm currently hampered
by a cyst in my right hand that makes it fairly hard to type right
now, so it's kinda limited my ability to participate in much
24 matches
Mail list logo
