> Dan MacNeil writes:
> > For my selfish purposes, "no-dupes" off is a better default setting.
> > Without a copy of the message to their mailbox, many of my users will
> > keep sending the same message because it "didn't go".
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Are you thinking of not-metoo?
Err, ye
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I think you're both right :). Mailman 2.1 will strip recipients from
> the CC header if explicitly named recipients are members of the list and
> have nodup set. But Mailman won't strip To headers, nor juggle CC and
> To headers after stripping.
Is see. But wouldn't it b
Mark Sapiro writes:
> I think Dan must be thinking of not-metoo, but note that even ensuring
> that not-metoo is off won't do the job for gmail users thanks to
> gmail's 'feature' of not showing 'duplicate' messages.
Yeah, but that's irrelevant to use of no-dupes, because gmail is
keying off a
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Dan MacNeil writes:
>
> > Stephen J. Turnbull quoted out of context:
> > > I see your point, but why won't my suggestion of defaulting the per
> > > user no-dupes to "on" do fine from that point of view?
>
> > For my selfish purposes, "no-dupes" off is a better default
Stephen J. Turnbull quoted out of context:
> I see your point, but why won't my suggestion of defaulting the per
> user no-dupes to "on" do fine from that point of view?
For my selfish purposes, "no-dupes" off is a better default setting.
Without a copy of the message to their mailbox, many of my
Dan MacNeil writes:
> Stephen J. Turnbull quoted out of context:
> > I see your point, but why won't my suggestion of defaulting the per
> > user no-dupes to "on" do fine from that point of view?
> For my selfish purposes, "no-dupes" off is a better default setting.
> Without a copy of the m
Barry Warsaw writes:
> I think you're both right :). Mailman 2.1 will strip recipients from
> the CC header if explicitly named recipients are members of the list
> and have nodup set. But Mailman won't strip To headers, nor juggle
> CC and To headers after stripping.
Ah, right. I ra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Sven Anderson writes:
>
>>> IIRC, if the user sets their subscription to "no-dupes", that user's
>>> address will be removed from the addressee list, as well as from the
>>> list of addresses t
Stephen J. Turnbull, 07.03.2007 18:30:
> Sven Anderson writes:
>
> > > IIRC, if the user sets their subscription to "no-dupes", that user's
> > > address will be removed from the addressee list, as well as from the
> > > list of addresses that Mailman actually distributes to the post to.
> >
Sven Anderson writes:
> > IIRC, if the user sets their subscription to "no-dupes", that user's
> > address will be removed from the addressee list, as well as from the
> > list of addresses that Mailman actually distributes to the post to.
>
> I just checked this to be sure, but only the lat
Stephen J. Turnbull, 06.03.2007 08:25:
> Sven Anderson writes:
>
> > 1) Receiver clean-up (if Reply-To munging is NOT used)
> > So what about an option to clean-up the receivers list in Mailman,
> > that is Mailman removes all To/CC addresses which are members of
> > the list?
>
> IIRC, if th
Sven Anderson writes:
> 1) Receiver clean-up (if Reply-To munging is NOT used)
> So what about an option to clean-up the receivers list in Mailman,
> that is Mailman removes all To/CC addresses which are members of
> the list?
IIRC, if the user sets their subscription to "no-dupes", that user
On Mon, 2007-03-05 03:24:33 +0100, Sven Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Receiver clean-up (if Reply-To munging is NOT used)
> One of the problems not using Reply-To munging is, that by using the
> reply-to-all function of MUAs the list of receivers tends to accumulate. As
> in open lists
Hi,
as many of you probably would agree, whether you munge the Reply-To headers
or not, both ways are not perfect. Just today I had a hard time again, as
I'm not happy with both options, and finally came up with some ideas how the
situation could be improved, about which I would like to read yo
14 matches
Mail list logo
