Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-28 Thread Terri Oda
On Feb 17, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: It's unfortunate that your developer can't adapt to the Mailman coding style. I work on tons of open source software, and of course lots of software at my job, and each project has its own coding guidelines. When in Rome... is the operative phrase

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, Sorry I'm responding late. We had presentations of master theses and I had to look after 3 out of 8 students for qualification. Moreover, 2 students are Chinese and difficulty in expressing themselves in Japanese. (Like myself in English :-( ) Adrian Bye wrote:

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 09:33, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: I looked through your code and my feeling is not integrating this patch in 2.1.6. We need to put a freeze on new features for 2.1.6. In fact, I think we should freeze all checkins except show-stopping bug fixes. I'd like to take between now

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 12:15, Barry Warsaw wrote: We need to put a freeze on new features for 2.1.6. In fact, I think we should freeze all checkins except show-stopping bug fixes. I'd like to take between now and the end of February for testing. Oh yes, and for all i18n champions to finish

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:15:44 -0500, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] I plan on installing the current 2.1.6 on my various sites and I hope others can do the same thing to help test 2.1.6 in order to get an end-of-February release. I'm willing to install the pending beta 4 if it's

RE: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Adrian Bye
We need to put a freeze on new features for 2.1.6. In fact, I think we should freeze all checkins except show-stopping bug fixes. I'd like to take between now and the end of February for testing. And, I just talked with my developer, and he got quite upset about the idea of fixing his

RE: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:22, Adrian Bye wrote: And, I just talked with my developer, and he got quite upset about the idea of fixing his code to conform to your coding style. So I guess that won't be possible for now. I certainly understand why you have coding guidelines, I agree they are

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps I missed this thread, but what standards are there? Link to doc? Barry Warsaw wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:22, Adrian Bye wrote: And, I just talked with my developer, and he got quite upset about the idea of fixing his code to conform to your coding style. So I guess that won't be

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 14:54, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps I missed this thread, but what standards are there? Link to doc? http://barry.warsaw.us/software/STYLEGUIDE.txt -Barry signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-17 Thread Tobias Eigen
Dear friends, I had *no idea* my post was going to generate this level of response. Thank you all. I'm simply fascinated by the dynamics in the group, inspired by your generosity, and eager to help out in any way I can. Let me make a few brief points, then forward another message I just sent

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Brad Knowles
At 8:54 AM -0500 2005-02-16, Tobias Eigen wrote: I know all this - and I know you know it, and I know all Mailman geeks like us get it. The problem is with regular, every day people who are expecting (and really can be expected to expect) Yahoogroups type interfaces. All I can say is that

RE: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Adrian Bye
All I can say is that Mailman is a non-profit open source project, run by a group of people in whatever spare time they can manage to scrape together. The Linux folks haven't cracked the ease-of-use aspects of their OS compared to Microsoft, not even for the companies that

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread JC Dill
Adrian Bye wrote: If someone wanted to pay large sums of money to make an open source Yahoo! Groups-beating package, and pay people to work on that as their full-time job, we might be able to change this situation -- in time. We've previously had conversations about some Yahoo groups

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:54, Tobias Eigen wrote: It's really weird to have to log in multiple times to access multiple list settings, especially if it's the same password being used everywhere. It's likewise weird to then be able to make global changes from one list's preferences page.

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Kevin McCann
Tobias Eigen wrote: What I envision having in my Mailman/Mambo system is a single user database with one password per username for all services. Users can then go to a simple preferences page on Mambo and do basic things like change their email address or password, tick a box to opt in/out of

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:13, JC Dill wrote: Right now, I would suggest being patient. I suggest you give it a week for Barry and the other key developers to to find the time to start looking at new code after they dig out from their present schedule overload caused by the recent security

RE: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Brad Knowles
At 11:28 AM -0400 2005-02-16, Adrian Bye wrote: We've previously had conversations about some Yahoo groups functionality which you said wasn't possible: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq04.039.htp Indeed, we have. Yesterday I contributed patches which enables

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Brad Knowles
At 8:13 AM -0800 2005-02-16, JC Dill wrote: I don't know what Brad's key focus is on this list, but I can share with you that *I* am not a developer in that I don't write code. I'm not a developer, either. I can do a little bit of hacking together scripts, but that's about it.

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re: [Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:42, Kevin McCann wrote: BARRY: would now be a good time to re-energize discussions on the MM3 development list? What is your time like? And are there any plans for a MM3 sprint? I can send people. Yes, let's start things back up on mailman3-dev. I definitely plan

RE: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers]Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Mark Sapiro
Adrian Bye wrote: Yesterday I contributed patches which enables Mailman to have this exact functionality which we borrowed from Yahoo Groups. Yet I've seen no response from you yet, and only one half dismissive response from another mailman developer. Since mine was to only reply to your post,

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Chuq Von Rospach
On Feb 16, 2005, at 8:45 AM, Brad Knowles wrote: I try to do all the little things I can, so that Barry and the core developers can focus their attention on the big things that I have no hope of ever being able to touch. For the most part, I try to follow the lead of people like Barry,

Re: making Mailman CAN-SPAM compliant (was Re:[Mailman-Developers] Hashing member passwords in config.pck)

2005-02-16 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:32:58 -0800, Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] I think its safe to say that it's not lack of interest or intent here with any of us, but a lack of free time. And time, of course is one commodity you can't do much about some times. Ditto. My daughter just