[Mailman-Users] multiple admin messages

2003-01-04 Thread Marci O'Daffer
Hi Folks, haven't seen anything like this in the archives, maybe you can helpjust upgraded to 2.1 final, and all is well, except every time there is an admin issue (e.g. a non-member post to a member-only list) I get zillions of the same admin-reminder email flooding my inbox at once! Any

[Mailman-Users] problems with different chatsets (footer gets attached if different)

2003-01-04 Thread Sebastian Talmon
Hi, on my lists (Mailman 2.1, language: DE) I have the problem that: - if the user send with charset=iso-8859-1 anything is fine - if user sends with charset=us-ascii (some mailers do if there are no german umlauts) then the footer from the mailinglist gets attached and the Message is

[Mailman-Users] MM2.1 check_perms messages.

2003-01-04 Thread Marco Trevisan | Bazzmann.Com
Hola! I just re-run check_perms -v to get a detailed report and check it, it's returned me this message: Traceback (most recent call last): File ./check_perms, line 354, in ? checkdata() File ./check_perms, line 307, in checkdata mode = statmode(path) File ./check_perms, line 75, in

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1 Install Issues

2003-01-04 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
DL == David LeVine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DL I think the Solaris make does support wildcarding, perhaps DL with slightly different syntax...:^) Maybe you can help figure out the right syntax for Solaris make? -Barry --

[Mailman-Users] Can users request old digests?

2003-01-04 Thread Ed Leafe
I recently received a request from a user who receives and archives the digest version of the list, and due to ISP problems he recently missed a few issues. He has used lists where you can send email to the list requesting specific digest back issues; is such a capability part of Mailman?

[Mailman-Users] Htdig integration patch availability

2003-01-04 Thread Richard Barrett
I have had several reports of people having trouble accessing patch #444884 on sourceforge. If anyone is still having that problem then, as a temporary measure, I have made all my MM-htdig integration patches (#661138, #444879 and #444884) available via

[Mailman-Users] VERP_CONFIRMATIONS in 2.1?

2003-01-04 Thread David Gibbs
Anyone know if VERP_CONFIRMATIONS ever got expanded to support more than just invitation confirmations? david -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ:

Re: [Mailman-Users] VERP_CONFIRMATIONS in 2.1?

2003-01-04 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
DG == David Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DG Anyone know if VERP_CONFIRMATIONS ever got expanded to support DG more than just invitation confirmations? Nope. And with the vacation program issue we'll have to discuss whether it's generally a good idea or not. -Barry

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1 Install Issues

2003-01-04 Thread David LeVine
I don't claim to be a developer, however, the following change to misc/Makefile.in works in my testing: -- cut here - diff misc/Makefile.in-2.1 misc/Makefile.in 78c78,81 $(INSTALL) -m $(FILEMODE) $(ICONS) $(ICONDIR) --- for i in $(ICONS); \ do \

Re: [Mailman-Users] Install issue on Mac OS 10.2.3

2003-01-04 Thread John W Baxter
At 17:30 +0100 1/2/2003, Jean-Michel Biraghi wrote: I forgot to install the Developer Tools indeed. Note that since the Developer Tools CD packed with Jaguar there have been a small but critical update, and more recently a complete new release (December 2002 Developer Tools). Hope you have a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Lotus Notes

2003-01-04 Thread John W Baxter
At 11:58 -0500 1/2/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: x-html!x-stuff-for-pete base= src= id=0 charset= brfont size=2 face=sans-serifAll the messages I get from the mailman-users list have no body. I am using the Lotus Notes client accessing mail on a lotus notes server. I can only see the message body

[Mailman-Users] Re: Lotus Notes

2003-01-04 Thread David Gibbs
John W Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:p05200f02ba3d1e2b4ec9@[192.168.1.50]... (One has to believe IBM has improved Notes with respect to the Internet since Lotus came under their wing.) One would be assuming a lot in that case. I run a number of IBM iSeries (AS/400) oriented

[Mailman-Users] mm2.1 held message notice options

2003-01-04 Thread Bryan Fullerton
Howdy, I notice that in mm2.1 the a message has been held notices to list owners/moderators now include the content of the message. When spam is held, this can result as the notice itself being tagged as spam, which causes them to be thrown in my spam folder. Is there an option to use the

[Mailman-Users] web interface for creating new list

2003-01-04 Thread Dan Phillips
First, many thanks to David Gibbs for his help in answering my ignorant questions about updating a plaintext patched MM-2.0.13. My lists all seem to be functioning fine, and the enhancements to the program are amazing. Has anyone put together an OS X style StartupItems folder for the qrunner