Brad Knowles writes:
At 12:10 PM +0900 4/6/07, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
In the short run, you probably should disable digestible for that
list. Mailman's I18N is not very robust in this respect, and it
may take some time to fix.
More importantly, I'm not sure where the
Hi
I have mailman 2.1.8. along with postfix. Everything
is fine. now from few days i watching few of my
sunscriber from list automatic get unsubscribe,
without knowing anyone. Could you tel me the causes
??? On membership list i am finding B option in nomail
reason??? whats this???
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 6, 2007, at 5:02 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
No, this is a problem that Mailman can handle, at least in theory.
I'm not familiar enough with Python codecs to deny that Python's codec
API and implementation may admit some improvements
Can some tell me, please, where I can increase the time allowed for
subscription confirmations?
--
Bill Bedford
Nothing is as important as model railways and even that isn't very
important
-some wiseguy somewhere
--
Mailman-Users mailing
I am trying to track down the cause of the following error message and
have been quite unsuccessful. Has anyone dealt with this or something
similar before? I thought the number of pending requests might have
been too large on some of the lists; however I am still receiving the
error after
python python sent the message below at 04:04 4/6/2007:
Hi
I have mailman 2.1.8. along with postfix. Everything
is fine. now from few days i watching few of my
sunscriber from list automatic get unsubscribe,
without knowing anyone. Could you tel me the causes
??? On membership list i am finding B
Sorry, I did not realize that I was not replying to the group. It is this
stupid browser based mail reader I have to use. The reply all apparently
doesn't work. The problem is my ISP, for some reason, cannot send anything from
me to mail.python.org. After 3 days I get a bounced mail telling me
Looking for something similar to emergency moderation but where
attempts to post are rejected as opposed to forewarded for
moderation. If you attempt to post, you get a bounce saying that
posting is temporarily disabled on this list. This happens
automatically, without anyone having to do
Bill Bedford wrote:
Can some tell me, please, where I can increase the time allowed for
subscription confirmations?
Set PENDING_REQUEST_LIFE in mm_cfg.py. The default is
PENDING_REQUEST_LIFE = days(3)
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay
Robin Bartholomew wrote:
I am trying to track down the cause of the following error message and
have been quite unsuccessful. Has anyone dealt with this or something
similar before? I thought the number of pending requests might have
been too large on some of the lists; however I am still
Hi. I'm using Mailman with postfix on SUSE, and have gotten to the point where
mail to list at dom1.ain and mail to list2 at dom2.ain distribute correctly
(and even show up in the appropriate list of lists in dom1.ain/mailman/listinfo
and dom2.ainmailman/listinfo . The problem that I am
Ira Goldstein wrote:
Is there a way that mail to lists on dom2.ain appears as if it comes from
dom2.ain, while keeping mail to lists at dom1.ain appearing as if it comes
from dom1.ain?
If the list's host_name attributes on the General Options page (Host
name this list prefers for email. near
Mark,
Thank you. The added print statement narrowed the offending request.pck
down very quickly. I am posting the solution to the list so other
non-python programmer can make use of this useful information.
Problem: cron/checkdbs error.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
My first problem is that the program seems to be inserting a carriage return
at 80 characters in the archives and in the digests. This is causing URL's
to be truncated and has elicited a lot of complaints from my users.
The second is not really a problem, but a request. Is there any way to sort
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:16:00 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second is not really a problem, but a request. Is there any
way to sort the archives by date in descending order rather than
ascending order? It makes no sense for the newest posts to be at
the bottom of the list.
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first problem is that the program seems to be inserting a carriage return
at 80 characters in the archives and in the digests. This is causing URL's
to be truncated and has elicited a lot of complaints from my users.
See
On Apr 6, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
See
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/
index.phpfunc=detailaid=1495122group_id=103atid=100103
for a description of the problem that I think is probably causing this
and a patch to fix it.
It
makes no sense for the newest posts to be at the
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Somebody has to point out that the link you gave points to a
discussion in which the most recent contribution is at the top.
I'm aware of that, but it's the SourceForge tracker, not mine.
I would have added You'll enjoy reading the comment thread from the
bottom up to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The second is not really a problem, but a request. Is there any
way to sort the archives by date in descending order rather than
ascending order? It makes no sense for the newest posts to be at
the bottom of the list.
This is a Your Mileage May Vary king of
I see from the FAQ that it is possible to set all list
member settings to moderated. I also see that it is possible
to set the privacy settings such that future new subscribers
have the moderated flag. What I don't see is if it is
possible to do what I want, which is to set the settings
such
20 matches
Mail list logo
