Hello,
I am being told by some subscribers that the HTML emails they receive
via a list run by Mailman contain attachments, although the original
emails have none.
In message body they only have their email address and attached they
have a file called ATT00351.htm and two inline images which
Mark Sapiro wrote:
But here's the thing: the only occurrence of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on the fresh system is a .forward file in
/root, /var/spool/postfix, and /home/ftg. The test message is sent from
the 'ftg' ID whose home directory is /home/ftg.
Do you guys follow or look at .forward files ?
On 3/17/2008, Frank Griffin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
My test machines all use a third-party relay server which requires
From: to be one of a fixed set of pre-registered values. I handle
this by using Postfix's generic file to rewrite the sender on
outbound messages to the 'frank.griffin'
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/17/2008, Frank Griffin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
My test machines all use a third-party relay server which requires
From: to be one of a fixed set of pre-registered values. I handle
this by using Postfix's generic file to rewrite the sender on
outbound
Charles Marcus wrote:
Most ISPs in the US simply allow relaying on their IP blocks...
But, they don't absolutely need to support *secure* smtp auth - basic
smtp auth would be much better than using and easily forged 'From:'
header...
I'd find another ISP/3rd party relay service...
On 3/17/2008, Frank Griffin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
They don't seem to want the risk of basic SMTP auth being cracked or
sniffed, so they just refuse to relay for anything outside their IP
block, period, no matter what.
snip
Since I don't want to have to reconfigure may laptop every time
Hi,
Greetings from spain.
Actually, our lists name includes a dot . in their names (i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
In our new hosting, they are unable to configure mailman in order to accept
the . dot character in the list name. If I create a list with a dot in the
name it will be created
I tried starting up my mailman installation this morning (mailmanctl start),
and I got the following message:
Traceback (most recent call
Antonio Guerrero wrote:
Actually, our lists name includes a dot '.' in their names (i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
'
In our new hosting, they are unable to configure mailman in order to accept
the '.' dot character in the list name. If I create a list with a dot in the
name it will be created ok, you
Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm confused... above you say that they don't allow relaying from
outside their network 'no matter what'... then you say you need their
relay service while outside their IP block...
The ISP and the third-party relayer are two different companies. I need
the relay
Ki Song wrote:
One major error I see is that there is no more disk space on the server.
How can I remedy this situation?
Buy a bigger disk. :-(
Seriously, this is an OS question, not a Mailman question.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay
One major error I see is that there is no more disk space on the server.
How can I remedy this situation?
Buy a bigger disk. :-(
Seriously, this is an OS question, not a Mailman question.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area,
One major error I see is that there is no more disk space on the server.
How can I remedy this situation?
Buy a bigger disk. :-(
Seriously, this is an OS question, not a Mailman question.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area,
Ki Song wrote:
The weird thing is that until this Friday, there was approximately 70-80%
free space on the 75GB partition.
I know this is not a mailman question, but how should I go about looking for
files that may have suddenly taken up all that disk space.
Tools like du and find with the
Ki Song wrote:
OK. What if I installed a second hard drive.
How easy is it to tell mailman and other programs to use the second hard
drive?
You'd have to copy the current partition to the new drive and then
umount the old partition and mount the new one.
Or, would it be easier/better to
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
I am being told by some subscribers that the HTML emails they receive
via a list run by Mailman contain attachments, although the original
emails have none.
In message body they only have their email address and attached they
have a file called ATT00351.htm and two inline
Hello,
2008/3/17, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
I am being told by some subscribers that the HTML emails they receive
via a list run by Mailman contain attachments, although the original
emails have none.
In message body they only have their email address
Hi guys,
I have some problem with mailman on debian sarge.
When i try to send mail to lists, i can see in my mail.log the following
message:
Mar 17 18:34:01 box postfix/pipe[374]: 312F06A0051: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
relay=mailman, delay=1105, delays=1105/0.14/0/0.07, dsn=4.3.0,
status=deferred
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
I did have %(user_address)s in full personalization which I now
changed to no personalization and removed the string. I hope this
helps. Thanks!
If you had a msg_header and removed it, that will help. The fact that
the header had personalized information is not relevant
Hi all,
I was hoping to not have to ask this, but I'm stumped.
I'm setting up fetchmail to pull mail from a Gmail account (taking
advantage of their spam filtering) and dump it into mailman. That
way I can avoid opening up Postfix as a POP, and just use it for the
SMTP out portion (which
Hello,
2008/3/17, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
I did have %(user_address)s in full personalization which I now
changed to no personalization and removed the string. I hope this
helps. Thanks!
If you had a msg_header and removed it, that will help. The fact
The esteemed Ki Song has said:
One major error I see is that there is no more disk space on the server.
How can I remedy this situation?
Buy a bigger disk. :-(
Seriously, this is an OS question, not a Mailman question.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is
billc wrote:
Let me know if I should be asking this on a fetchmail list instead,
but I think the part where i'm stuck is with the
mda /usr/local/mailman post testlist
When I run this manually instead of as a daemon, it appears to be
looking for the mailman app, not the folder. Where
Hi all,
We are a group of volunteers in China, we need a mail-list to share information.
We will be really appreciate if you supply us a long-term free mail-list.
Best Regards!
Yours sincerely,
Bill Yang
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
At 11:18 AM -0700 3/17/08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
billc wrote:
Let me know if I should be asking this on a fetchmail list instead,
but I think the part where i'm stuck is with the
mda /usr/local/mailman post testlist
When I run this manually instead of as a daemon, it appears to be
looking
At 12:03 PM -0700 3/17/08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I'm still getting
/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman is a directory
Which it is. An empty one, at that.
It shouldn't be. It should be an executable binary something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /usr/local/mailman/mail
total 20
-rwxr-sr-x
Bill Yang wrote:
We are a group of volunteers in China, we need a mail-list to share
information.
We will be really appreciate if you supply us a long-term free mail-list.
The Mailman project provides Free Open Source Software for managing
mailing lists. We do not provide mail list
billc wrote:
No, no --exec-prefix, and I don't see any glaring errors in the
install log. Some permissions issues on language files was pretty
much all.
But I'll try again, just to make sure.
It should be enough to just run 'make install' in the unpack src/
directory (or maybe just copy the
I want to remove aliases from my mailman installation to avoid spam
backscatter. Which aliases do I absolutely need?
Here's a list from mm-handler:
@ValidActions = qw(admin bounces confirm join leave
owner request subscribe unsubscribe);
Hi All,
I am hoping someone can help, one of our customers would like to send out
emails where the content is personally addressed. e.g Dear Jacqui. I have
searched the FAQ but am probably using wrong terminology. If someone could
point me in the right direction it would be appreciated.
Cheers
Jacqui Owen wrote:
I am hoping someone can help, one of our customers would like to send out
emails where the content is personally addressed. e.g Dear Jacqui. I have
searched the FAQ but am probably using wrong terminology. If someone could
point me in the right direction it would be
Kenneth Porter wrote:
I want to remove aliases from my mailman installation to avoid spam
backscatter. Which aliases do I absolutely need?
Here's a list from mm-handler:
@ValidActions = qw(admin bounces confirm join leave
owner request subscribe unsubscribe);
You do not
--On Monday, March 17, 2008 6:53 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
'join' and 'leave' are synonyms for 'subscribe' and 'unsubscribe'. Jo
Rhett would say you don't need any of these because nearly everyone
uses the web. He might also say you don't need/want 'request' and
--On Monday, March 17, 2008 5:33 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In addition, Mailman can personalize the To: header of the message.
See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.015.htp
for information about personalization options.
The use of the subject
Kenneth Porter wrote:
The use of the subject prefix is the subject of a common flame war in many
lists, so it would be nice if that could be personalized.
See:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=350103aid=1104433group_id=103
See
Jean-Christian BEDIER wrote:
I have some problem with mailman on debian sarge.
When i try to send mail to lists, i can see in my mail.log the following
message:
Mar 17 18:34:01 box postfix/pipe[374]: 312F06A0051: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
relay=mailman, delay=1105, delays=1105/0.14/0/0.07,
At 12:58 PM -0700 3/17/08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
billc wrote:
No, no --exec-prefix, and I don't see any glaring errors in the
install log. Some permissions issues on language files was pretty
much all.
But I'll try again, just to make sure.
It should be enough to just run 'make install' in the
37 matches
Mail list logo
