Dony Tata wrote:
how to make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
same machine from web, i use postfix and mailman 2.1.5 patch true
virtual hosting. Patch true virtual hosting from
https://lethe.koumbit.net/svn/koumbit/trunk/patches/mailman-true-virtual-2.1.5.patch;.
i
Dony Tata wrote:
how to make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
same machine from web, i use postfix and mailman 2.1.5 patch true
virtual hosting. Patch true virtual hosting from
https://lethe.koumbit.net/svn/koumbit/trunk/patches/mailman-true-virtual-2.1.5.patch;.
i got
Dear mailman guys..
I have this option under Sender Filters set to NO :
Should messages from non-members, which are automatically discarded, be
forwarded to the list moderator?
yet I keep recieving messages:
From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
TO : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how can I
Khalil Abbas wrote:
Dear mailman guys..
I have this option under Sender Filters set to NO :
Should messages from non-members, which are automatically discarded, be forwarded to the list moderator?
yet I keep recieving messages:
From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
TO : [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:49 AM -0700 Brad Knowles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CLI interface is not going to auto-generate that e-mail message, so
by default it is not going to auto-generate that password either.
When I add a new list via the CLI, I must
Dylan Jenkinson wrote:
This works, but sends out an unsubscribe message which, for my purposes
is unwanted. So I went on to use the following string to try to
unsubscribe without the messages:
http://[sever]/admin/[list]/members/remove?adminpw=[password]unsubscribees=[email]
When I try
Hi Friends. I have noticed that this list's archives include 3 months which
have not happened yet.
How has this occurred, and what will happen when we reach that date and new
posts crash into the improperly dated archives?
More importantly, how does one search the mailman archives looking for
Michael Welch wrote:
Hi Friends. I have noticed that this list's archives include 3
months which have not happened yet.
How has this occurred, and what will happen when we reach that date
and new posts crash into the improperly dated archives?
More importantly, how does one search the
I have renamed two GNU Mailman lists using the four mv commands in the
middle of the following FAQ:
http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030617
When I go back into the new admin screen, the list name in the first box
still shows oldlist and needs changing to newlist.
I get
Michael Welch wrote:
Hi Friends. I have noticed that this list's archives include 3 months
which have not happened yet.
How has this occurred, and what will happen when we reach that date
and new posts crash into the improperly dated archives?
As Dragon notes, this is because the original
Aidan C A Hopkins wrote:
I have renamed two GNU Mailman lists using the four mv commands in the
middle of the following FAQ:
http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030617
When I go back into the new admin screen, the list name in the first box
still shows oldlist and needs
Carol Kavanaugh, M.Sc., ASQ CQE
Statistical Consulting
voice - (613) 634 6193
fax - (613) 634 8458
e-mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web - http://www.kavanaugh.ca
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On 17 Jul 2008 at 10:23, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Aidan C A Hopkins wrote:
I have renamed two GNU Mailman lists using the four mv commands in the
middle of the following FAQ:
http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030617
When I go back into the new admin screen, the list
On 7/17/2008, Dragon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
That happens because the date is extracted from the Date: header of
the message. The header is set by the MUA sending the message, if
somebody has their computer clock set incorrectly, this will happen.
Wow... haven't run into that one yet...
Is
Simon wrote:
Is there a simple way to tell mailman to use the servers RECEIVED
date/time instead?
See the documentation in Defaults.py for the settings
ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE_POLICY = 2
ARCHIVER_ALLOWABLE_SANE_DATE_SKEW = days(15)
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is for
On 7/17/2008, Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
See the documentation in Defaults.py for the settings
ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE_POLICY = 2
Ah, perfect, thanks... so setting it to 1 will always use the received date.
I'm wondering what the disadvantages to this are - assuming the server
Simon writes:
On 7/17/2008, Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
See the documentation in Defaults.py for the settings
ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE_POLICY = 2
Ah, perfect, thanks... so setting it to 1 will always use the received date.
I'm wondering what the disadvantages to this
--On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:47 PM +0200 Timm Stamer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Don,
I use
newlist --language=$lang $listname $email `pwgen -sB 15 1`
in my scripts to generate passwords. Search for pwgen.
Timm Stamer
Timm,
That works perfectly. Thanks to all who replied to my
Dony,
As the developers have pointed out you can:
1. Wait for Mailman 3.0
2. Use CPanel which has modified Mailman to support virtual hosts
3. Use the patch you found and get support from the developer and most
likely remain on an older version of Mailman
I have another method that I use with
On 7/17/2008 4:03 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE_POLICY = 2
Ah, perfect, thanks... so setting it to 1 will always use the received date.
I'm wondering what the disadvantages to this are - assuming the server
date/time is always correct?
The main disadvantage AFAICS
While testing my local install, one of my colleges found an exploit with the
forgot password and unsubscribe option of the web UI and ended up
spamming me ( on purpose to prove the pt), 90 emails to the list-owner in
under 5 min as a different user ( mainly my test user), so this could be
easily
For one thing, that correction is applied at the time of archiving,
not reception. So, if you regenerate your archives in the future,
then all thase date/time stamps will change.
--
Brad Knowles
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 17, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Enhancement request:
Allow the following to work:
http://localhost/mailman/...
Then, somewhere within the configuration, mailman is told that localhost is
equal to, in my case, vidiot.com/www.vidiot.com.
After doing so more research tonight, even if I sent up the DNS bind
configuration
Mike Brown writes:
I then changed the hosts file to look like:
192.168.1.1 mrvideo vidiot.com www.vidiot.com loghost
Are you sure 192.168.1.1 isn't the DSL box? 192.168.1.1 is grabbed
for themselves by many DSL boxes. But whatever.
Anyway, changing that to 127.0.0.1 should do what
I just started using Mailman (2.1.11) via Dreamhost. I have one user who
tells me that, on his Palm Treo using Versamail (all software up-to-date) he
receives messages from the list, but the message body is always blank. I've
searched and read the posts on this forum and have a) asked him if his
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:27:27PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mike Brown writes:
I then changed the hosts file to look like:
192.168.1.1 mrvideo vidiot.com www.vidiot.com loghost
Are you sure 192.168.1.1 isn't the DSL box? 192.168.1.1 is grabbed
for themselves by many
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:27:27PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Anyway, changing that to 127.0.0.1 should do what you want; the DSL
box can't get its hands on that since it never leaves the local host
at all.
Found it. I have two Opera browsers running (don't ask) with separate .opera
27 matches
Mail list logo
