One of my lists is discarding messages for some reason.
THe vette file looks like the following ..
Aug 10 18:52:42 2006 (5414) Message discarded, msgid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug 10 18:55:43 2006 (5414) Message discarded, msgid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am subscribed to the list. I suspect someone
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
One of my lists is discarding messages for some reason.
THe vette file looks like the following ..
Aug 10 18:52:42 2006 (5414) Message discarded, msgid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug 10 18:55:43 2006 (5414) Message discarded, msgid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am subscribed
OK .. I am just now noticing this on my lists.
The To: field on all my lists have
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although, I am sending it to lists.example.org.
Is this a postfix or a mailman configuration issue?
Thanks,
LDB
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
OK .. I am just now noticing this on my lists.
The To: field on all my lists have
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although, I am sending it to lists.example.org.
Is this a postfix or a mailman configuration issue
Whenever a user sends to my lists from his account he does NOT
receive his own post but yet
New_members_options - Do not send a copy of member's own post
is NOT checked.
Could it be that it was once checked?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Whenever a user sends to my lists from his account he does NOT
receive his own post but yet
New_members_options - Do not send a copy of member's own post
is NOT checked.
Could it be that it was once checked?
Thanks,
LDB
was rejected because either they are
not a member or their address has changed. One problem with this solution is
that the option for multiple languages becomes a bit of an issue.
On 7/23/06, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gibbs wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have been rejecting
I have been rejecting messages from non-members but I am
not sure that is the best practice. Is it better to discard
rather than reject non-members messages?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
I do not have bounce processing enabled but yet one morning
I have a list of about 15 users unsubscribed from the list.
According to logs, they all look like this,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] auto-unsubscribed [reason: BYBOUNCE]
This obviously says it was removed because of some
measure of bounces
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I do not have bounce processing enabled but yet one morning
I have a list of about 15 users unsubscribed from the list.
According to logs, they all look like this,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] auto-unsubscribed [reason: BYBOUNCE]
This obviously says
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Is bounce processing turned off for the list and not just
DEFAULT_BOUNCE_PROCESSING = No in mm_cfg.py?
Does not exists anywhere in my config.
So new lists are created with bounce_processing on and you manually
turn it off
I have a mailing list that will not accept a specific
HTML message from a subscribing user. It will accept
other messages but not this particular. I tested the
message against a test list and the message posted just
fine. So, I can probably conclude that there is
something wrong with that
I have a message in the vette directory labeled:
Message has implicit destination
The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have a message in the vette directory labeled:
Message has implicit destination
The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
What does scripts/paths.py now contain?
# -*- python -*-
# Copyright (C) 1998-2003 by the Free Software Foundation, Inc.
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
# modify it under the terms of the GNU
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Did you add import japanese to bin/paths.py or was it already there?
If you added it, you also have to add it to scripts/paths.py and
cron/path.py, and for completeness, tests/paths.py if you have a
tests/ directory
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
You may have a syntax error (typo) in scripts/paths.py. Try just running
python scripts.paths.py
It should exit without printing anything. If there's an error, it will
print an exception.
No exceptions.
Actually, when I added
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
If you have everything but the pythonlib/japanese/ directory, you can
unpack the JapaneseCodecs-1.4.11.tar.gz, cd to the unpack directory
and run
python ./setup.py build
This will create a 'build/' subdir which contains a lib*/ subdir which
contains a
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
If you have everything but the pythonlib/japanese/ directory, you can
unpack the JapaneseCodecs-1.4.11.tar.gz, cd to the unpack directory
and run
python ./setup.py build
This will create a 'build/' subdir which contains a lib
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Back again .. The posts are working but the admin. interface page is not
working
and it is displaying the following message in the browser ...
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.6
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
Please inform the webmaster for this site
Jun 14 20:49:14 2006 (19227) Uncaught runner exception: unknown encoding:
japanese.euc-jp
Jun 14 20:49:14 2006 (19227) Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py, line 111, in _oneloop
self._onefile(msg, msgdata)
File
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
LookupError: unknown encoding: japanese.euc-jp
I have the above error in my logs. I need this Japanese encoding but my SuSE
10.0 dist does not stock it. Where can I find it so mailman can work with my
Japanese mailing lists?
The euc-jp
I have been getting rid of lists lately and I need
to forward old lists to the new lists. I am using
mailman 2.1.6 and the forwards are not working.
I also recently upgraded the OS from Debian to SuSE 10.0.
Any ideas anyone??
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have been getting rid of lists lately and I need
to forward old lists to the new lists. I am using
mailman 2.1.6 and the forwards are not working.
I also recently upgraded the OS from Debian to SuSE 10.0.
How are you forwarding? What's
In moving from Debian to SuSE 10.0, the mailing lists' links like,
http://lists.example.org/cgi-bin/mailman/admindb/test-list
do not work anymore because the actual link on the new server is
http://lists.example.org/mailman/admindb/test-list
I can take care of this via apache but there has to
Jun 6 22:07:21 mailserver postfix/local[3100]: D7F6F580BB:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=local, delay=1, status=SOFTBOUNCE
(Command died with status 1: /var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post test-list)
I keep getting the above in postfix logs and my lists are not working. Is this
due to name of
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Jun 6 22:07:21 mailserver postfix/local[3100]: D7F6F580BB:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=local, delay=1, status=SOFTBOUNCE
(Command died with status 1: /var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post test-list)
I keep getting the above in postfix logs and my lists
Anyone out there using the above script on SuSE 10.0 to protect
their mailing lists? I keep getting the below errors after the mailing lists
move.
D67F4580B8 2239 Tue Jun 6 22:38:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(temporary failure. Command output: exceptions.OSError [Errno 2] No such file
or
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Anyone out there using the above script on SuSE 10.0 to protect
their mailing lists? I keep getting the below errors after the mailing lists
move.
D67F4580B8 2239 Tue Jun 6 22:38:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(temporary failure. Command output: exceptions.OSError
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have a user telling me ..
It looks like the pipermail installation is hosed in some interesting way.
The emails that I send have both text/html and text/multipart sections.
It scrubbed the text/html part, but didn't bother including the text/plain
I have a user telling me ..
It looks like the pipermail installation is hosed in some interesting way.
The emails that I send have both text/html and text/multipart sections.
It scrubbed the text/html part, but didn't bother including the text/plain part.
But yet ...
Default.py:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Is it acceptable to forward old lists that are not used anymore to one
single list?
I'm not sure what you're getting at or what result you want, but if you
mean could you set MTA aliases for several different
[EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. addresses
Is it acceptable to forward old lists that are not used anymore to one single
list?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
What is the easist way to globally filter email marked SPAM?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
What is the easist way to globally filter email marked SPAM?
Assuming you mean in Mailman, use the KNOWN_SPAMMERS list in mm_cfg.py,
e.g.
KNOWN_SPAMMERS = [('subject', '^.*spam'), ('x-spam-flag', 'yes')]
This is a list of tuples of (header
I am having trouble figuring why when a message from a non-member sent to my
lists does not immediately bounce back to the sender saying, You are not a
member.
Also, I have a lot of held messages in qfiles/*/* and data/*. How can I
manually
process those?
Thanks,
LDB
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I am having trouble figuring why when a message from a non-member sent to my
lists does not immediately bounce back to the sender saying, You are not a
member.
If that's what you want, you need to set Privacy options...-Sender
filters
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
If that's what you want, you need to set Privacy options...-Sender
filters-generic_nonmember_action) to Reject.
Does not work? I was hoping there was something I was missing but
apparently
not. I do not receive the reject messag until about 4
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
3) When typing, mailq, on the server, it does not list the corresponding
held messages. These are message Mailman has in its qfiles that PostFix
does not know about.
In which qfiles? If it is qfiles/retry/*, then the message
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie
I have not tried the above but it is asking for confirmation because the
posts
are from legitimate automatic engines that send email. The list does not
know
how to distinguish between SPAM and a legitimate automatic post.
Any ideas on resolving
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
These are message Mailman has in its qfiles that PostFix
does not know about.
In which qfiles? If it is qfiles/retry/*, then the message has been
queued for retry because the original MTA delivery
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
In which queue do you find it?
the out queue
Are there any relevant messages in any of Mailman's logs, particularly
'locks', 'qrunner', 'error' and 'smtp-failure'?
Nothing good in qrunner, locks or error. smtp-failure has
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
In which queue do you find it?
the out queue
Are there any relevant messages in any of Mailman's logs, particularly
'locks', 'qrunner', 'error' and 'smtp-failure'?
Nothing good in qrunner, locks or error. smtp-failure has
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
In which queue do you find it?
the out queue
Are there any relevant messages in any of Mailman's logs, particularly
'locks', 'qrunner', 'error' and 'smtp-failure'?
Nothing good in qrunner, locks or error. smtp-failure has
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
In the vette log, I am seeing these messages from the automatic posts ...
Feb 06 06:13:14 2006 (17698) mail-list post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] held,
message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Message has implicit
destination
So the post is held because
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the subscribed address.
The headers are as follows:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 19:25:04 2006
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
OK .. Here is the reason it says ..
Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
but he is a member of the list. Are headers necessary for you guys to see?
What is the subscribed address?
What are the following headers
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
OK .. Here is the reason it says ..
Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
but he is a member of the list. Are headers necessary for you guys to see?
What is the subscribed address?
What
, Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve
their posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
OK .. Here is the reason it says ..
Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
but he is a member of the list. Are headers necessary for you guys to see?
What is the subscribed address?
What are the following headers
Team:
I have some issues with my mailing list.
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their posts
for some reason. And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me to apporove it. Any ideas???
Thanks,
LDB
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have users subscribe to a list but yet I always have to approve their
posts
for some reason.
For what reason? Every hold has a reason, what is this one?
And when I do have it accept this address for future posts, it
still emails me
Glenn Sieb wrote:
Lawrence Bowie said the following on 1/20/2006 7:26 PM:
If create a mailing list called test-list, then do I have to create aliases
like this
Hey Lawrence!
If you take a look in $PREFIX/mailman/data/aliases, you'll see that
Mailman's nice enough to do it for you
If create a mailing list called test-list, then do I have to create aliases
like this
mailman: |/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post mailman
mailman-admin:|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman admin mailman
mailman-bounces: |/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman
Excellent!!! That is the answer I was expecting. Thank you very much for
the clear explanation.
LDB
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
The above are missing for several of my mailing lists. How do I remedy
this dilemma? Do I HAVE to recreate the lists?
If you do anything, it should
The above are missing for several of my mailing lists. How do I remedy
this dilemma? Do I HAVE to recreate the lists?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
59 matches
Mail list logo
