Re: [Mailman-Users] footer

2003-01-31 Thread Tom Neff
If you have the ability to patch your Mailman installation, you could add a new variable name (like mlist.fortune) to the ALLOWEDS array in Mailman/Gui/Digest.py and then use the 'withlist' command to set this variable to a new value every so often, and include it in the msg_footer field in

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Tom Neff
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:47 PM -0800 Robin Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailman spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as headers? At the risk of garnering another that's not exactly what I asked, a 2.1

[Mailman-Users] 2nd request: migrating a list from 1.1 to 2.1 hosts?

2003-01-28 Thread Tom Neff
There seem to be some other threads capturing people's attention, but Barry has logged in and sent mail a couple of times :), so I'm assuming this fell through the cracks. I have some lists on a host running MM1.1, and a new host running MM2.1. I need to move the 1.1 lists over to the new

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2nd request: migrating a list from 1.1 to 2.1hosts?

2003-01-28 Thread Tom Neff
--On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 5:44 PM -0500 Matthew Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -[ From mailman-2.1/UPGRADING ]- UPGRADING FROM 1.x to 2.x [...] Yes, I read that document (and I've used its advice in the past), unfortunately it doesn't cover my present situation because I'm not really

[Mailman-Users] Migrating from 1.1 on one machine to 2.1 on another?

2003-01-26 Thread Tom Neff
I looked through all the docs and list archives for an answer to this, but didn't find one, so here goes. I have several large active lists on Host A that's running Mailman 1.1. I have a new server, Host B, that's more powerful and the new home, etc, etc, and already has a few active lists

[Mailman-Users] Re: Web Mail Agents Generate Suspicious Headers?

2002-06-02 Thread Tom Neff
As Mike says, look at the Privacy options. SquirrelMail is exceptionally well-behaved (I use it myself and recommend it) so I am surprised to see its mails rejected. However, because it is web based and (in the default configuration) runs sendmail to send messages, there is one header you

[Mailman-Users] is private mail being redirected here?

2002-05-14 Thread Tom Neff
I am seeing what appears to be a series of one-sided answer posts from [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoting messages that have not previously appeared on the mailman-users list. If this person is redirecting private responses to the list without the correspondent's permission, that's considered rude

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-18 Thread Tom Neff
. --On Monday, April 15, 2002 2:09 PM -0700 Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:55:01AM -0400, Tom Neff wrote: Billie R. McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are using version 2.0.8 for a moderated list. But, we aren't able to edit messages before approving them

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-16 Thread Tom Neff
It's difficult to edit message bodies with encoded MIME parts, although one can still edit the headers. For plain text messages, I have found the 2.0.8 patch (which simply places headers and body in separate editable textareas) to be usable. It sure would be nice if someone would make a

[Mailman-Users] Re: Editability of messages

2002-04-15 Thread Tom Neff
Billie R. McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are using version 2.0.8 for a moderated list. But, we aren't able to edit messages before approving them (for example, to delete just one inappropriate word). How can we do this? There is a FAQ entry that wants you to hand edit various spool

[Mailman-Users] Re: Removing those extra List-* headers

2002-04-08 Thread Tom Neff
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually itis the only product that my host offers for mailing lists. It is a damn good program in all respects other than the programmers decision to force this on us and wrongfully cite it as following the standards. The standards make it optional not forced.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: how to remove List-* headers

2002-03-29 Thread Tom Neff
--On Friday, March 29, 2002 9:30 PM -0500 Ron Jarrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In 2.1 you can go into mm_cfg.py and break RFC2369 compliance by setting ALLOW_RFC2369_OVERRIDES to 1. That'll enable a policy at your site that list owners can turn it off, which will cause the cgi scripts to

[Mailman-Users] Re: stripping Received: headers

2002-03-28 Thread Tom Neff
Dan Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Be aware that not having [Received:] headers will make troubleshooting certain kinds of subscriber problems more difficult. Not an issue for announce-only lists, and maybe not so much an issue for moderated lists, but for others, keep a copy. The simplest

[Mailman-Users] Re: stripping Received: headers

2002-03-27 Thread Tom Neff
Dmitry Barabanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there any easy way to strip Received: headers from messages that mailman sends to subscribers? There are utilities that are distributed with 'procmail' and/or 'maildrop' that are very useful for this sort of thing, in particular 'formail' and