Hi,
I am wondering at what level this can be changed.
I have a server - lists.domain1.name. This is the primary hostname.
I have a list - sas...@lists.domain2.name which I am hosting on this server.
Take for example in this obfuscated bounce below:
mail...@lists.domain2.name via
On 3/24/19 1:14 PM, wally b wrote:
>
> Maybe I found the cause of this:
> (last part of) the headers look like this:
>
>
> X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on b(0, 0, =
> 0);" class=3D"">Als u zich =
> wilt afmelden voor deze emails, laat ...
>
>
>
> The text "..b(0,.." etc seems not to belong
Hi,
Since I updated my server (ubuntu, mailman with exim) it seems that mailman
does not send the complete mail headers.
Some mail clients can not interpret and display the mails correctly and show
mails like this:
���8�}��ox�M�{^���鮖ةj�j[^�v���j^1��ۀ��a6�A�
Maybe I found the
So I recently had a member of our list ask that the headers about
sending and receiving messages be put at the end of the email, and I
happen to think it's a good idea as that is a standard format that
people are used to seeing. However my header field is blank, though I
do have a custom footer.
Bob Fishel wrote:
So I recently had a member of our list ask that the headers about
sending and receiving messages be put at the end of the email, and I
happen to think it's a good idea as that is a standard format that
people are used to seeing. However my header field is blank, though I
do have
I am trying to move this thread to email-...@python.org since the
underlying issue is in the email package. Further, since as of Mailman
2.1.12, we no longer install a Mailman specific version of the email
package, it really has to be addressed in the email package.
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
The problem may be with the MUA that composed the mail or it may be with
Mailman's adding the subject_prefix. I think I'd need to see the raw
message as sent to the list to know for sure.
Kārlis forwarded an email to me off list. It's salient feature is the
subject header
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
On Sunday 14 June 2009 17:12:22 you wrote:
Kārlis forwarded an email to me off list. It's salient feature is the
subject header
Subject: skatamies, cik ilgi google =?utf-8?q?m=C4=93=C4=A3ina?=
=?utf-8?q?_nog=C4=81d=C4=81t?=, kad nevar...
which is wrapped here but was
On Sunday 14 June 2009 17:12:22 you wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
The problem may be with the MUA that composed the mail or it may be with
Mailman's adding the subject_prefix. I think I'd need to see the raw
message as sent to the list to know for sure.
Kārlis forwarded an email to me off
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
On Sunday 14 June 2009 17:12:22 you wrote:
Kārlis forwarded an email to me off list. It's salient feature is the
subject header
Subject: skatamies, cik ilgi google =?utf-8?q?m=C4=93=C4=A3ina?=
=?utf-8?q?_nog=C4=81d=C4=81t?=, kad nevar...
which is
Mark Sapiro writes:
I think there is a minor bug in decode_header() in that it won't
recognize a RFC 2047 encoded word in a comment if the encoded word is
not separated by whitespace from the ) that terminates the comment.
However, this is the only place where an encoded word need not be
Hello mailman users,
I am using mailman script called from cron /usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_news
to synchronize mails between our company private only news server (INN) and
our company mailing list.
When mail is gated from news to mailing list - news: header is not removed,
mailing list headers
David Hláčik wrote:
I am using mailman script called from cron /usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_news
to synchronize mails between our company private only news server (INN) and
our company mailing list.
When mail is gated from news to mailing list - news: header is not removed,
mailing list headers
Hi there
Suddenly postings on our Mailman (2.1.5) list are missing headers, the
mails sometimes arrive without any Information about the sender or the
subject. The headers From and Reply-to and Subject are missing.
In addition I wanted to send a HTML-Email with an attachment: It
wasn't displayed
Roland Studer wrote:
Suddenly postings on our Mailman (2.1.5) list are missing headers, the
mails sometimes arrive without any Information about the sender or the
subject. The headers From and Reply-to and Subject are missing.
Sometimes? Not always?
In addition I wanted to send a HTML-Email
Roland Studer wrote:
Itis really strange, actually sometimes I got the posting with correct
headers, while others got the very same posting without those headers.
In that case, this almost certainly has to be something occurring after
Mailman has sent the message to the outgoing MTA, either in
On 5/26/06 7:43 AM, Roland Studer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suddenly postings on our Mailman (2.1.5) list are missing headers, the
mails sometimes arrive without any Information about the sender or the
subject. The headers From and Reply-to and Subject are missing.
In addition I wanted to
i have just uploaded a patch to Sourforge that allows you to set
sitewide headers and footers for the Mailman 2.1.7 web UI,
[ 1415956 ] Sitewide headers/footers XHTML Compliant Web UI
This patch was borne out of a request I received to
make the Mailman UI fit the look of the web site. This
patch
(I've looked for this in archives, but I must have the wrong search phrases.)
Could someone tell me how to edit the headers in Outlook Express so that I can
approve or resend messages from there?
Also, can you give me an example the format of a header with an approved header
in it?
Thanks
Jeanne Goodman wrote:
(I've looked for this in archives, but I must have the wrong search phrases.)
Could someone tell me how to edit the headers in Outlook Express so that I can
approve or resend messages from there?
This is not a Mailman question, and I'm not a MS-OE expert, but I don't
Thank you very much. You have cleared up a lot of things.
Can you recommend a Windows Friendly MUA that does allow one to add a custom
header?
Is there any way to edit a message before approval with my mail client
limitation? I saw in the FAQs how to edit a message by forwarding it to
On 19/10/05, Jeanne Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much. You have cleared up a lot of things.
Can you recommend a Windows Friendly MUA that does allow one to add a custom
header?
Pegasus Mail. http://www.pmail.com.
AFAIC, it's the best windows MUA. And the best part, it's
Jeanne Goodman wrote:
Can you recommend a Windows Friendly MUA that does allow one to add a custom
header?
Another response recommends Pegasus Mail.
There are also ports of Mutt which is very functional but not GUI. If
you're interested, search google for mutt+windows,
Is there any way to
Cogley, Rick wrote:
Here is a specific scenario along with the mail headers of the rejected
mail sent by the tracking system:
* John Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends an email address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is the address my group has provided
Acme to use for sending support requests to.
*
Mark - thanks very much for your response and advice.
Make the another-list list anonymous. Then the From: address in the
message it sends back to the tracking system will be the address of the list
which can be a registered user in the tracking system. The original
submitter is still available
Hello everyone -
I'm hoping someone more experienced than I can assist me. After a couple of
weeks working with the system I now understand the basic workings of Mailman
2.1.5 (loaded on Fedora Core 4 via RPM), but am hitting a wall with nested
or umbrella lists, and I suppose some specific
My headers and footers are not sent in either instant or digest email
broadcasts to the list.
Any ideas?
Disclaimer of Content and Validity
Mr David T Wills
Managing Director Co-Founder
Naughty Vend (UK) Ltd.
Office Suite 610
456-458 The Strand
London, WC2R 0DZ
This email is intended
David Wills wrote:
My headers and footers are not sent in either instant or digest email
broadcasts to the list.
See the FAQ
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Article 4.39
Perhaps the headers and footers are being put in separate MIME parts
that your MUA doesn't show you.
On May 26, 2005, at 22:48, Mark Sapiro wrote:
David Wills wrote:
My headers and footers are not sent in either instant or digest email
broadcasts to the list.
See the FAQ
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Article 4.39
Perhaps the headers and footers are being put in
Hi guys,
I have had patches made for two issues:
1. HTML headers footers handling
2. 1 click list unsubscribe
You can get our patches here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1121257group_id=103a
tid=300103
Or also here:
http://tasdevil.com/mailman_developers.zip
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 7:13 PM +1100 2004-11-24, Terry Allen wrote:
Many thanks for the above your last reply. I'm still unsure as to why
my posts are being held prior to being sent - they are getting through,
but something about a 'suspcicous header'. Possibly because my address
is
At 7:21 AM -0800 2004-11-24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Hold for suspicious header occurs because a header matched one of the
regexps in bounce_matching_headers - see legacy spam filters in
Privacy options...-Spam filters.
Ahh. Found it. Apparently, there have been major spam problems
in the past
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 7:21 AM -0800 2004-11-24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Hold for suspicious header occurs because a header matched one of the
regexps in bounce_matching_headers - see legacy spam filters in
Privacy options...-Spam filters.
Ahh. Found it. Apparently, there have been
At 6:15 PM +0100 2004-11-24, Brad Knowles wrote:
Or are you saying it is in the list for the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list?
That's what I meant by Apparently, there have been major spam problems
in the past with ozemail.com.au.
Anyway, this issue has been resolved.
--
Brad Knowles, [EMAIL
At 8:04 AM -0800 2004-11-24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Or are you saying it is in the list for the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list?
That's what I meant by Apparently, there have been major spam
problems in the past with ozemail.com.au.
--
Brad Knowles, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Those who would give up essential
At 7:21 AM -0800 2004-11-24, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Hold for suspicious header occurs because a header matched one of the
regexps in bounce_matching_headers - see legacy spam filters in
Privacy options...-Spam filters.
Ahh. Found it. Apparently, there have been major spam
problems in the past
RE personalization of addresses:
Ayup, this is in the FAQ.
faq03.015.htp
Thanks to those who pointed this out; I missed it. I am currently on a shared Unix
web host where Smartlist is installed by the hosting company in my /home/ directory
and I am allowed to customize it.
For those of you
At 3:13 PM -0500 2004-07-15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of you on shared hosts, can you get to the Mailman script
and customize it as described in the faq?
Mailman isn't really intended for use in this manner. You can
install a shared copy and customize the templates on a per-list
Hello-
I have setup and installed Mailman 2.1.3. and it's
working fine. I just have one question; on the
digests, I am getting full headers for each post for
some reason. Is there any way to get mailman to strip
those, or are there any suggestions as to a setting I
may have wrong?
Thanks!
Hello
I am using Mailman version 2.1.4 on a Solaris 5.8 box using sendmail. I'm
using it to host interoffice lists to which users should not be given the
chance to subscribe/unsubscribe. That's all well and good, but when
someone posts to the list, mailman puts in a few unwanted headers:
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004 10:51 AM, Tim Faircloth wrote:
moderators), so I do not want the users to see these headers. Is
there a way to strip these headers out, or configure mailman to
leave out these headers?
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq04.001.htp
While not
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Unwanted headers in mail body
Once agian.. somebody ??
HI,
I'm new to this list. Hope you can help me out.
I'm running a mail list through a ISP, so i'm not the owner of the server
and don't have acces to the Mailman host.
But i've the following question; Some
HI,
I'm new to this list. Hope you can help me out.
I'm running a mail list through a ISP, so i'm not the owner of the server
and don't have acces to the Mailman host.
But i've the following question; Some of our users recieve mails with
complete headers in the body and the original message is
I'd like to just add a completely new custom header (in this
case, an X-Comment) to a mailing list. Is there any easy way to do
this with mailman? If not, does anyone have suggestions for how to do
this using procmail, sendmail configuration, or similar?
Cheers
David
PS apologies for
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 03:09, David Cake wrote:
I'd like to just add a completely new custom header (in this
case, an X-Comment) to a mailing list. Is there any easy way to do
this with mailman? If not, does anyone have suggestions for how to do
this using procmail, sendmail
At 10:12 AM -0400 2/10/03, Jon Carnes wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 03:09, David Cake wrote:
I'd like to just add a completely new custom header (in this
case, an X-Comment) to a mailing list. Is there any easy way to do
this with mailman? If not, does anyone have suggestions for how to
Howdie,
Is there anyway to get the full headers of messages added when
messages are archived? At the moment only the senders address is shown.
This is using mailman 2.1
Thanks
---
Gareth Hopkins
Server Operations
UUNET South Africa
(o) +27.21.658.8700
(f) +27.21.658.8552
(m)
There is no configuration switch to do this, but you can edit the Source
Code to add additional headers. I was just looking at that code this
morning and adding additional header info would be very easy.
Jon Carnes
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 19:01, Gareth Hopkins wrote:
Howdie,
Is there
Since upgrading to 2.1, I notice that instead of:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Realname [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Q. Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The headers appear as:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Realname [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Q. Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this
Now that 2.1 has -subscribe and -unsubscribe addresses as well as a
-request address shouldn't the headers of the lists carry an appropriate
List-Subscribe and List-Unsubscribe header? Mine (and this list's) still
show the older format of
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
How do I
Hello,
I have some real problem with mailman 2.0.11
I check
require_explicit_destination : yes
and add
acceptable_aliases : myalias@armage\.org
(both with web interface)
then in my /etc/alias I add this line :
myalias: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do newaliases, try to send a mail at [EMAIL
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:21:33 +0300
Dmitri Gofmekler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dear Mailman Users and authors, I have a small problem with an
archived messages with international headers. Is it possible to see
normal (decoded) subject instead this one:
Hello Dear Mailman Users and authors,
I have a small problem with an archived messages with international
headers. Is it possible to see normal (decoded) subject instead this
one: =?koi8-r?B?8MXS18HRINfF0tPJ0SDMydPUwSDHz9TP18Eu?=
Thanks,
Dmitri.
So far, I've dealt with this entirely by getting my server whitelisted
with the ISPs that are doing that. I believe that there is a setting for
the number sent in a batch, but to go from 500 (default, I think) to 1
would be an excruciating hit to your performance. I believe all of the
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:32:54 -0700
G Armour Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that there is a setting for the number sent in a batch, but
to go from 500 (default, I think) to 1 would be an excruciating hit to
your performance.
See the FAQ.
The sweet spot is typically in the range
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, J C Lawrence wrote:
I believe all of the discussion-list type servers (Mailman, listserv,
Mercury, Majordomo, et al) use the same mechanism, so the ISPs that
are using this technique for stopping spam will have to address
legitimate list servers.
Sadly, nope.
SMTP
Dear
List
My mailman mail
headhave many users in it. SomeISP don´t accept my messages. How can
Isolve it (one message toeach user)
Thanks
Flávio
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Flavio wrote:
My mailman mail head have many users in it. Some ISP don´t accept my
messages. How can I solve it (one message to each user)
This is an MTA issue. Mailman just sends the message to your MTA,
your MTA is responsible for talking to remote MTAs (such as at an
I am looking for a list server that will handle sending html headers and
footers. I would like for it to be able to accept any message format and
add the headers and footers, I guess it would have to convert the message to
html. Will mailman handle this task?
Jon Fraley
I subscribe to the SA Talk list for SpamAssassin discussions in digest mode. When I
receive a digest, it shows all the headers in every digested message. So I get loads
of List-*, Resent-*, Content-Type, etc., etc. headers in each and every digested
message.
IMHO, Mailman should remove these
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 20:56, J C Lawrence wrote:
A MIME digest should contain unedited versions of the constituent
messages. Why? That way it can be burst back into the discrete
messages just as if the subscriber had received them that way in the
first place (and is the way digests are and
At 11:56 AM 5/29/02, J C Lawrence wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2002 08:01:56 -0700
Bob Weissman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I subscribe to the SA Talk list for SpamAssassin discussions in
digest mode. When I receive a digest, it shows all the headers in
every digested message. So I get loads of
I like the mailman system. However, I run a particular list and I am
the only one who can subscribe/unsubscribe members and no members can
use the list to send messages to other members. Therefore, what I
would like to be able to do is eliminate the header area that
displays the following:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:28:11 -0700
Rey Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get rid of this portion?
Please see the FAQ:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL
I was wondering if there was an option to turn on or off the email headers
that mailman adds.
IE:
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users,
mailto:[EMAIL
At 23:53 +1100 3/28/2002, Darryl Harvey wrote:
I searched the FAQ and the admin docs, but found nothing mentioning these
headers. They can get ugly on some mail readers (IE: Eudora)
They can be turned off in Eudora (it's easier in the Mac version than the
Windows version). I have my Eudora set
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:53:00 +1100
Darryl Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there was an option to turn on or off the email
headers that mailman adds.
Please see the FAQ:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)
I have installed 'mailman' on my VPS and am having a one small, but
irritating problem!
posts to various lists do not seem to get the 'Headers' or 'Footers' added
to mail going through mailman.
I have attempted to edit the headers footers via the web interface and the
mm_cfg.py file directly,
I am new to Mailman, which I like on the whole, having used Majordomo, and
have been reading this mailing list (as a digest), which is really useful
(but see 3) thank you.
1. I would like email commands to do my admindb approvals. Is there any
way? Next version?
2. In a moderated list
How do I remove following mail headers?
X-BeenThere
X-Mailman-Version
List-Help
List-Post
List-Subscribe
List-Id
List-Unsubscribe
List-Archive
Thank you
Thomas Chung ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:23:01 -0800
Thomas Chung Chung wrote:
How do I remove following mail headers?
FAQ:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq04.001.htp
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
[EMAIL
On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 14:04:02 -0400
Forrest Aldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to, on a list-by-list basis, turn OFF the X-
headers?
Currently no. Your only approach at this point is patching the
source.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to have mailman pass Received: (or any other) headers
through? If so, how?
-- nick
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Nick Seidenman wrote:
Is it possible to have mailman pass Received: (or any other) headers
through? If so, how?
It already does. These came off of your message, as it was received
in my mailbox. The bottom 2 Recieved headers were added before the
message was processed
On Tue, 22 May 2001 20:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
Nick Seidenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to have mailman pass Received: (or any other)
headers through? If so, how?
Mailman does not fiddle with headers it doesn't need to to fulfill
its functions. You're Received: headers are safe.
I just went to the latest mailman on a new server from1.02 on a different
server. Where are all the headers come from? More importantly, where can I
trim them?
IE:
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe:
It seems that for one of my lists' monthly password reminders, mailman
is putting incorrect headers in, making it appear that the reminder is
coming from a different list.
The list whom this user is subscribed to is called 'researchnet',
whereas the headers are claiming that it is coming from
Ed Lazor wrote:
Aren't these headers part of the "proposed" RFC? If so, you can't call the
MUA non-RFC compliant, since the proposal hasn't been finalized and approved.
Can anyone tell me what the RFC is that mentioned the headers. I am
getting hasseled by some users and if I can point them
John Vorstermans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed Lazor wrote:
Aren't these headers part of the "proposed" RFC? If so, you can't call the
MUA non-RFC compliant, since the proposal hasn't been finalized and approved.
Can anyone tell me what the RFC is that mentioned the headers. I am
getting
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, John Vorstermans wrote:
Ed Lazor wrote:
Aren't these headers part of the "proposed" RFC? If so, you can't call the
MUA non-RFC compliant, since the proposal hasn't been finalized and approved.
Can anyone tell me what the RFC is that mentioned the headers. I am
I was just messing with a Lyris list, and note that they have a way in the admin
interface to turn on/off "Friendly headers", which is the exact thing this discussion
has been about.
Bob
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do disagree with Ed it is not a matter of freedom, it is a matter of
respect, and some of you having not shown any respect for Ed and his
opinions. He started out being very respectful of you and he had been
very considerate until some of you started getting nasty about him
requesting for
Jeez. Time for the asbestos suits.
Mr. Hillson, Ed, and others should realize that honey catches more
flies than vinegar. And that the majority of Mailman developers
aren't being paid for this work. Don't try to fire volunteers.
They're hard to find.
A question to Mr. Hillson and others,
Let me start this by saying that I am not a developer, I don't know
any of the developers, and I have no personal interest in this whole
thing.
I am sure that there are people on this list who's methods of personal
interaction are distasteful to some others on the list. I think that
this has
Mr. Hillson, Ed, and others should realize that honey catches more
flies than vinegar. And that the majority of Mailman developers
aren't being paid for this work. Don't try to fire volunteers.
They're hard to find.
Trust me. I certainly don't want to fire anyone. I also tried to
suppress
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0800, Ed Lazor wrote:
I'm not just running announcement lists, but I think I may have
an idea on this. I believe people use Mailman for ease of use. In
the case of announcement lists, it provides easy administration,
easily viewable archives, and easy
Jeez. Time for the asbestos suits.
This was not a fire storm I started but I got irritated at.
Mr. Hillson, Ed, and others should realize that honey catches more
flies than vinegar. And that the majority of Mailman developers
aren't being paid for this work. Don't try to fire volunteers.
Again feel free to modify your copy. Or fork if you are so sure this
is the right thing to do.
It's the nature of projects like this to get used in ways that the authors didn't
exactly anticipate. Often these variations can be accommodated with simple options,
which seems like a way better
the Received: headers?
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Hi,
The Mailman headers are very verbose, is there a way to set the config so it
is less obnoxious for the users? I am not using sendmail for anything else
on this machine. We are using Mailman 2.0.1 on RedHat 7.1.
-elly
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The Mailman headers are very verbose, is there a way to set the config
so it is less obnoxious for the users? I am not using sendmail for
anything else on this machine. We are using Mailman 2.0.1 on RedHat
7.1.
The users should not be shown these headers by a sane
The users should not be shown these headers by a sane MUA. If your MUA
is forcing these headers on users then it is non-RFC compliant and
should be taken out and shot.
Aren't these headers part of the "proposed" RFC? If so, you can't call the
MUA non-RFC compliant, since the proposal hasn't
One question that has been asked repeatedly of the people on your side if
this question and never answered: what MUAs show these headers by default?
From feedback I've received, it appears Eudora is the most widely used MUA
showing these headers. I think a few people were using old versions
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Ed Lazor wrote:
From feedback I've received, it appears Eudora is the most widely used MUA
showing these headers. I think a few people were using old versions of
pine, dtmail, and Netscape Navigator. I'd have to double check to verify
this, but I hope that helps.
I use Eudora at home all the time, though, and it DOESN'T show these
headers by default...
This is because you've upgraded Eudora to the most recent version and / or
made changes to the TabooHeaders parameter in the eudora.ini
file. Right? And if that's the case, are you suggesting people
At 01:09 PM 2/15/2001 -0800, Ed Lazor wrote:
I use Eudora at home all the time, though, and it DOESN'T show these
headers by default...
This is because you've upgraded Eudora to the most recent version and / or
made changes to the TabooHeaders parameter in the eudora.ini
file. Right? And if
HOWEVER, since the source code is freely available, you have it within
your power to modify it and remove the offending lines of code that
generate the "extra" headers.
Do we *really* have to go through this again and again?
How about adding something to the FAQ that describes what changes to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Ed Lazor wrote:
How about adding something to the FAQ that describes what changes to make?
Well, (a) it's a rarely-asked, not frequently-asked, question, and (b) it
will slow adoption of the RFC.
--
ROGER B.A. KLORESE [EMAIL
How about adding something to the FAQ that describes what changes to make?
Well, (a) it's a rarely-asked, not frequently-asked, question, and (b) it
will slow adoption of the RFC.
And because it's the wrong thing to do, and I don't want to see it
encouraged or supported, even implicitly.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Ed Lazor wrote:
How about adding something to the FAQ that describes what changes to make?
Well, (a) it's a rarely-asked, not frequently-asked, question, and (b) it
will slow adoption of the RFC.
The question that drove the FAQ request above was:
HOWEVER, since the source
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
