The items below have come up lately as things we'd like to be able to do
with our mailman setup. I'm open to any alternative suggestions, hacks or
comments...
One of my biggest mailman lists is used to broadcast messages to our
entire student body. The list contains approximately ~5500 non-digest
Mark T. Valites wrote:
...
The head of our department periodically sends out email to mailing lists
for each of our residence halls on campus. All the lists are set up to
hold messages from non-list members. Not being a list member, she can't
tell if/when the message has been approved. Is there
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Why not either add her as a member with delivery off or add her to the
filter of non-members allowed to post?
I try to stay out of the visible path of my list moderators. While I'm
sure most of them would be receptive to the change, I'm sure some would
On Aug 26, 2004, at 11:56 AM, Mark T. Valites wrote:
The department that is responsible for the list is leary of making all
the
members of the list digest members, in case an important message needs
to
be sent immeadiately. Even though we have a non-digested emergency
911
list synchronized with
Mark T. Valites wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Why not either add her as a member with delivery off or add her to the
filter of non-members allowed to post?
I try to stay out of the visible path of my list moderators. While I'm
sure most of them would be receptive to the
On 8/14/02 12:55 PM, John W Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never use those forward to a friend (or soon to be former friend)
things, and cringe when friends aim them at me. I'm too lazy to look into
privacy policies deeply enough to know what's going to happen to the
addresses and the
Wooh,
hey, yeah, sounds wonderful.. just tell me one thing..
Who's gonna be held responsible?
heh
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 03:29 am, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 23:57, G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
Very, very good idea, actually. I certainly know my friends and coworkers
On 8/13/02 1:29 AM, Nigel Metheringham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Wile E Spammer of Evil Spammers Incorporated writes a little
script that does an invite subscribe of a few hundred throusand of his
friends with an invitation note of whatever crap he is sending out
this week.
Isn't this
Kind request: Do not post in HTML.
--
Rajesh Patel wrote:
(1) On subscription, the email sent out requires the user to ACTIVATE the
mailing request before they actually get added to the list. This is to
address an issue where people are sometimes registered without their
(1) On subscription, the email sent out requires the user to ACTIVATE the
mailing request before they actually get added to the list. This is to
address an issue where people are sometimes registered without their
consent!
If you'll go into the mailing list options, I believe there is a
RP == Rajesh Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RP Last of all I have a general question which I do not see
RP addressed in the FAQ - how is a request like this handled and
RP is there any feedback so I can tell if this request is going
RP anywhere anytime soon?
Mailman 2.1's in
Tom Whiting wrote:
(2) A feature that allows a user to register someone else (a friend) with
an Introduction ADDED to the subscription email that is sent. So I could
subscribe a friend and add a personal messge so they know I sent this to
them ...
VERY VERY not good idea (though that's
On 8/12/02 3:57 PM, G. Armour Van Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But
if the confirmation message included a note *from me*, whom they know, and
then
offered them the chance to ignore the message and not subscribe, or to reply
to be
subscribed, this would be a good process.
No, bad idea.
Dear Sir
I hope this is going to the right place. I would
like to request the following two features:
(1) On subscription, the email sent out requires
the user to ACTIVATE the mailing request before they actually get added to the
list. This is to address an issue where people are sometimes
14 matches
Mail list logo
