At 8:03 PM -0600 2005-07-28, Elizabeth Lear wrote:
> Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber
> can be hacked out without breaking things, or is it too integral to
> the code?
I believe that omitting or hacking Scrubber.py is likely to lead
to behaviour t
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:52, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> The real issue here seems to be that the import from mm_cfg done in the
> driver script is inadequately protected. The driver script
> print_traceback definition contains
>
> try:
> from Mailman.mm_cfg import VERSION
> except Impor
Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
>Elizabeth Lear wrote:
>
>>>Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in
>>>ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the
>>>archiver. :-(
>>
>>
>> Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber
>> can be hac
Hi,
Elizabeth Lear wrote:
>>Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in
>>ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the
>>archiver. :-(
>
>
> Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber
> can be hacked out without breaking th
> Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in
> ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the
> archiver. :-(
Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber
can be hacked out without breaking things, or is it too integral to
the co
Hi All,
I am having some trouble with integration of mailman and mysql. We have
a mysql server that has the mailman databases on it and I can connect to
it from the mailman server and can send emails out from it but the
subscribe function appears to not work. I get the confirmation email
and
On 7/28/05, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may not be what you're looking fore, but there are examples of
> MemberAdaptor on sf.net that enable using LDAP and MySQL to hold list
> membership information.
>
> http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=871062&group_id=103&atid=3
Roy Vinner
>
>So, after I've set the -with-cgi-gid=apache and
>--with-mail-gid=mailman and rerun configure, will I need also to
>re-run make and make install? That will be a job for tomorrow...
Yes.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, C
Casper Tonka wrote:
>Has anyone modified mailman to allow additional information to go on
>the subscriber list, such as phone numbers? I would like to use
>mailman as a combination "shared phone-directory", and mailing list
>system.
This may not be what you're looking fore, but there are example
Hi Mark,
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Elizabeth Lear wrote:
>
>>Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through
>>rather than trying to save them on the server?
>
>
> You could remove Scrubber from the pipeline,
Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in
ToDi
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> roy vinner wrote:
>
>>I created a group www -- which included apache, mailman, and myself --
>>and set -cgi-gid=www.
>>The apache would not run the mailman/create, as it was complaining that
>>it could not run as www (even though apache was included in ). So I
>>set -cg
Has anyone modified mailman to allow additional information to go on
the subscriber list, such as phone numbers? I would like to use
mailman as a combination "shared phone-directory", and mailing list
system.
If not, do you know of an alternate system which supports this?
Elizabeth Lear wrote:
>
>Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through
>rather than trying to save them on the server?
You could remove Scrubber from the pipeline, but I don't think you want
to do that because I think the MIME structure of the message with
attachments will
roy vinner wrote:
>
>I created a group www -- which included apache, mailman, and myself --
>and set -cgi-gid=www.
>The apache would not run the mailman/create, as it was complaining that
>it could not run as www (even though apache was included in ). So I
>set -cgi-gid=mailman and set user
Hmm, thanks.
Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through
rather than trying to save them on the server?
...eliz
--
Children are made up of genetics, blind luck, and the stories you tell them.
- The Flying Ks
---
Russ Romano wrote:
>
>I'm new to the mailman users list. I was a remote admin for a
>listproc-based mailing list for many years and upgrading to mailman a
>couple of years ago. A recent upgrade by our ISP pushed me to mailman
>v2.0.13, and certain features appear to have been lost/hidden in this
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> roy vinner
>
>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Running this from the command line is not necessarily a valid test. The
>>>wrapper (/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman) exects to be run by the MTA
>>>with the group that was configured by ./configure. This is almost
>>>always not t
On 7/28/05 4:13 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this setting change whether or
>> not postfix runs chrooted or not?
Well, the option probably doesn't change, but the locations of lots of
things do change. For starters, if chrooted, Postfix couldn't find the
wrapped CGI unless
roy vinner
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Running this from the command line is not necessarily a valid test. The
>> wrapper (/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman) exects to be run by the MTA
>> with the group that was configured by ./configure. This is almost
>> always not the 'mailman' group. See
>> http:
Shane Harsch wrote:
>I have a single list among 10 others running on Mailman 2.1.5 under SuSE
>9.2 with Postfix MTA. All the lists are working but one list.
>
>Monitoring /var/log/mail I see the message come in and get handed off to
>mailman for every list, including "problemlist".
By handed off
Mark Sapiro wrote:
<...>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailman-2.1.6]$ /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman request try
>>Failure to find group name mailman. Try adding this group
>>to your system, or re-run configure, providing an
>>existing group name with the command line option --with-mail-gid.
>
>
>
> R
roy vinner wrote:
>
>I've also discovered that if I run an alias expansion from the command line
>
>aliases:
>..
># STANZA START: try
># CREATED: Mon Jul 25 17:19:03 2005
>try: "|/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post try"
>try-admin: "|/u
Hi Jan,
Jan Kohnert wrote:
<...>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailman-2.1.6]$ /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman request try
>>Failure to find group name mailman. Try adding this group
>>to your system, or re-run configure, providing an
>>existing group name with the command line option --with-mail-gid.
>
Hi John,
I appreciate your quick response!
John Dennis wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:28 -0500, roy vinner wrote:
>
>>Greetings!
>>
>>I have a problem that any address which is supposed to be resolved with
>>the path-to-mailman/data/aliases produces a "message undeliverable" error.
>>
>>I've
roy vinner schrieb:
> Greetings!
Hello,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailman-2.1.6]$ /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman request try
> Failure to find group name mailman. Try adding this group
> to your system, or re-run configure, providing an
> existing group name with the command line option --with-mail-g
Better yet, add the following to the MAKE_ARGS section of
/usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf :
'mail/mailman' => 'MAIL_GID=mailman',
This will also save you each time you run portupgrade.
--On Thursday, July 28, 2005 6:28 PM -0300 Tiago Cruz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tiago Cruz escreveu:
>
>
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:28 -0500, roy vinner wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I have a problem that any address which is supposed to be resolved with
> the path-to-mailman/data/aliases produces a "message undeliverable" error.
>
> I've also discovered that if I run an alias expansion from the command lin
Greetings!
I have a problem that any address which is supposed to be resolved with
the path-to-mailman/data/aliases produces a "message undeliverable" error.
I've also discovered that if I run an alias expansion from the command line
aliases:
..
# STAN
Tiago Cruz escreveu:
> Now, I have the problem listed in FAQ called "Group mismatch error" but
> I don't try fix-it today, but tomorrow I'll try fix this permissions.
Now, the mailman works beautiful!!! Wonderfoul!!!
For Postfix, follow:
cd /us/ports/mail/mailman
make deinstall
vi Makefile
Set:
Hi Y'all --
First, thanks so much to Mark Sapiro for answering a number of questions.
Why the duplicate messages? I'm still not really sure. But I had debug on
in a couple of sendmail config files - etc/resolv.conf and etc/qpopper.conf.
Python didn't like that I guess and as Mark suggested, M
Hi @all!
I have progress!!! :) After hours of test, follow:
Vince Van De Coevering escreveu:
> The following is from the gentoo guide
> Code Listing 12.3: Setting defaults: Mailman/Defaults.py
>
> (Change the values below to reflect your primary domain, virtuals will be
> set next.)
> DEFAULT_EM
I have a single list among 10 others running on Mailman 2.1.5 under SuSE
9.2 with Postfix MTA. All the lists are working but one list.
Monitoring /var/log/mail I see the message come in and get handed off to
mailman for every list, including "problemlist".
Monitoring ~mailman/logs/* I see the mes
Hello...
I'm new to the mailman users list. I was a remote admin for a
listproc-based mailing list for many years and upgrading to mailman a
couple of years ago. A recent upgrade by our ISP pushed me to mailman
v2.0.13, and certain features appear to have been lost/hidden in this
migration. I
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
>The problem was an obscure typo in mm_cfg.py. Missing single quotes,
>basically. It's "obscure" because it wasn't very obvious... and I
>looked over everything with a fine-toothed comb, including our proxy and
>httpd setup!
>
>It seems to me that Mailman could probab
Jean-Philippe GIOLA wrote:
>Dan Phillips wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2005, at 7:53 AM, Jean-Philippe GIOLA wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I know it is possible to re-create archives' html files for a list
>>> using
>>> "/bin/arch listname path_to_listname.mbox"
>>> But my problem is that i want to r
Brad Knowles wrote:
>At 7:03 AM -0500 2005-07-28, David Scribner wrote:
>
>> On my current LetterRipPro list server I have
>> the Digests for the lists that have a digest option to send for each
>> list at a different time, actually about a half an hour apart just to
>> l
At 8:30 AM -0500 2005-07-28, Dan Phillips wrote:
> Although wouldn't it be easy enough to do with a little massaging of
> the mailman crontab, creating a different job for each list?
Yup, as Jim Tittsler just pointed out.
Thanks for the correction!
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PR
Dan Phillips wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2005, at 7:53 AM, Jean-Philippe GIOLA wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I know it is possible to re-create archives' html files for a list
>> using
>> "/bin/arch listname path_to_listname.mbox"
>> But my problem is that i want to re-create those html files only for
>>
On Jul 28, 2005, at 7:19 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> Nope. Except for digests that are sent when the size threshold
> is reached, all digests are sent at the same time -- when the
> "senddigests" cron job is run for that day.
Although wouldn't it be easy enough to do with a little massaging
On Jul 28, 2005, at 21:03, David Scribner wrote:
> Also, I don't see anything where I can set the time that a Daily
> Digest is sent out. On my current LetterRipPro list server I have
> the Digests for the lists that have a digest option to send for each
> list at a different time, actually about
Hi all
I know it is possible to re-create archives' html files for a list using
"/bin/arch listname path_to_listname.mbox"
But my problem is that i want to re-create those html files only for the
last mail of listname.mbox
Is it possible ??
reguards.
--
Jean-Philippe Giola - 6577
At 7:03 AM -0500 2005-07-28, David Scribner wrote:
> Also, I don't see anything where I can set the time that a Daily
> Digest is sent out.
It's a cron job. Did you enable all the cron jobs like you were
supposed to?
> On my current LetterRipPro list server I ha
On 7/28/05 7:03 AM, David Scribner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am currently running a "test" list on Mailman (2.1.5) on OSX Tiger
> (10.4.2) and seem to have some problems with the sending of Digests.
>
> I have the list set that it will bunch traffic in Digests. And I
> have the option "Sho
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 07:03 -0500, David Scribner wrote:
> I am currently running a "test" list on Mailman (2.1.5) on OSX Tiger
> (10.4.2) and seem to have some problems with the sending of Digests.
>
> I have the list set that it will bunch traffic in Digests. And I
> have the option "Should a
I am currently running a "test" list on Mailman (2.1.5) on OSX Tiger
(10.4.2) and seem to have some problems with the sending of Digests.
I have the list set that it will bunch traffic in Digests. And I
have the option "Should a digest be dispatched daily when the size
threshold isn't reached?
At 3:07 PM +1000 2005-07-28, Iain Pople wrote:
> We are using Solaris UFS.
If switching filesystems is an option, you might want to take a
look at Veritas VxFS. It's a commercial replacement that should be
more than enough for your needs. I've had experience with SGI XFS
(on real SG
At 12:55 AM -0400 2005-07-28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While I can't address your question directly, I can say that this
> isn't an issue. Just use ReiserFS or set your ext2/3 filesystems to
> use dir_index. Either one will give you hashed directory lookups and
> resolve this performance i
47 matches
Mail list logo
