On 01/24/2018 09:16 PM, Jordan Brown wrote:
I don't understand this statement. Or, I don't understand how it
disagrees with what I said. I don't really care whether the MUA has a
"Reply List" button that does something list-specific. "Reply" should
go to the author; "Reply All" should go to
On 1/24/2018 4:48 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 10:40 AM, Jordan Brown wrote:
>> If a message had only List-Post and From, that wouldn't get the
>> result that I would want. I would want Reply to go to the author. As
>> a list member, I consider it an absolute
On 1/24/2018 12:50 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I think there's an obvious algorithm for "smart single reply":
>
> 1. If there is a Reply-To, address the message to Reply-To.
> 2. Else if there is a List-Post, address the message to List-Post.
> 3. Else address the message to From. (If
On 01/24/2018 10:40 AM, Jordan Brown wrote:
On 1/24/2018 12:50 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I think there's an obvious algorithm for "smart single reply":
1. If there is a Reply-To, address the message to Reply-To.
2. Else if there is a List-Post, address the message to List-Post.
3. Else
On 01/24/2018 01:50 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I'd appreciate if those who have strong opinions on this would take a
look at the analysis below and tell me if I'm missing something. If not,
maybe I'll write up a BCP (non-standards-track RFC[1]) so it's on record.
See my comments inline
Peter Shute writes:
> I wonder how much dangerous javascript in email is these days.
The #infosec and #bitcoin tweeps I follow are all a-twitter about
javascript that mines bitcoins, which is pretty seriously energy- and
cpu-intensive. (They have opinions at opposite poles though. :-)
It
I'd appreciate if those who have strong opinions on this would take a
look at the analysis below and tell me if I'm missing something. If
not, maybe I'll write up a BCP (non-standards-track RFC[1]) so it's on
record.
This proposal actually has a history going back to about 2005. I
didn't do
