Peter Shute writes: > I wonder how much dangerous javascript in email is these days.
The #infosec and #bitcoin tweeps I follow are all a-twitter about javascript that mines bitcoins, which is pretty seriously energy- and cpu-intensive. (They have opinions at opposite poles though. :-) It really depends on your list, though. If very little spam (by that I mean less than one per quarter) gets through, and you don't have Javascript tricksters among the posters, I don't see why this would be a major worry. Your paranoia level is your choice, though, and it is less risky if you have a few people with skills who can identify problematic mail and tell you about it. Steve ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
