On 09/12/2018 09:33 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <5b99c857.19328.61f1d...@bernie.fantasyfarm.com> you write:
>> Well, something changed between Thursday and Friday, because posts to the
>> list
>> were fine and this one generated a bounce for every gmail member.
Has Gmail been bouncing
In article <5b99c857.19328.61f1d...@bernie.fantasyfarm.com> you write:
>Well, something changed between Thursday and Friday, because posts to the list
>were fine and this one generated a bounce for every gmail member.
Any chance that the message in question had a From: address in a
domain that
On 13 Sep 2018 at 10:35, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Bernie Cosell writes:
>
> > I've gotten buried by 80 bounce messages, thanks to gmail's new
> > policy [that was, apparently, put into effect yesterday]. The
> > bounces say:
>
> Can you provide more information about this, or are you
Bernie Cosell writes:
> I've gotten buried by 80 bounce messages, thanks to gmail's new
> policy [that was, apparently, put into effect yesterday]. The
> bounces say:
Can you provide more information about this, or are you deducing a new
policy from the sudden spate of bounces? I ask
I don't have a Mailman recommendation, but the situation is worth some
comment:
Notice Gmail "blocks" with a 4xx temp fail, for a message they will never
accept. That's a protocol violation. It's abusive.
I've been seeing the same temp fail abuse for some messages received from
Mailchimp and
At Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:04:58 -0400 "Bernie Cosell"
wrote:
>
> I've gotten buried by 80 bounce messages, thanks to gmail's new policy [that
> was,
> apparently, put into effect yesterday]. The bounces say:
>
> <@gmail.com>: host alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.129.26] said:
>
