On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Sarah K. Miller wrote:
I know many people have asked for a way to remove a single address from multiple
lists. Here's my solution (run as a script):
Or, faster, a patch I wrote for remove_members:
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 04:32:56PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
I want to setup multiple servers running (the same) mailman lists.
The ways I can think of doing this is either:
Been there, done that, didn't work.
Option 1:
Setup a master machine with everything on it
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:20:52PM -0700, Sarah K. Miller wrote:
I run a server with about 80 lists on it. Everything goes smoothly until
the monthly reminder is sent out on the first of the month. Every
outgoing message indicates the Sender is the same list-owner,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Daniel Einspanjer wrote:
Fortunately, it is no longer the standard hard link problem. :) I read
the FAQ and the README.LINUX and ran the secure_linux fix. One thing that
took me a bit to figure out is that you have to run that script with a
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:25:48PM -0400, Christopher VanOosterhout wrote:
After some review of the list archives I do not find an answer to what I
think will be a pretty simple question.
How do I make backups of my lists? What files are critical?
I want to back up the email addresses
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 08:35:22PM -0500, Pug Bainter wrote:
This one has been running for 10 hours so far. It is doing things
[mostly mremaps()], but it takes way too long. This seemed to be the
case that once it got to a certain point it had trouble computing the
different threads.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:09:38PM +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
I've discovered the cause of the CPU usage problem. I had ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX
set to the default of 2. It appears that the archiver eats an awful lot of
processor power - so much that the backlog caused by the earlier bug was
taking ages
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:09:38PM +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
I've discovered the cause of the CPU usage problem. I had ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX
set to the default of 2. It appears that the archiver eats an awful lot of
processor power - so much that the backlog caused by the earlier bug was
taking ages
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:16:27PM -0700, Carol wrote:
I have set No to this option: Check postings and intercept ones that
seem to be administrative requests.
When I post to my list (called Testlist) I get the following message.
Your mail to 'Testlist' with the subject
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 07:11:23PM +0530, Satya wrote:
Anyway, what part of mailman takes care of subject lines? I'll hack
that rather than change it for every list.
You can rgrep the code as well as I can :-)
Marc
--
Microsoft is to operating systems security
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:54:11AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
cvr == chuq von rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cvr yup. and until the spam goes away, that'll continue,
cvr too.
Our Exim administrator has installed the filters suggested by Marc
Merlin (thanks Marc). Let's
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 06:50:36AM +0530, Satya wrote:
Subject: [Teamct]moo
^
That's an example from one of my lists. I seem to be running 2.0.1.
What happened to the space? It also happens on other lists at this
installation.
Sorry for the late reply (I don't think
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:58:05AM -0500, Pug Bainter wrote:
Good Morning,
With the group write permissions on the directory, it's a little less
secure and I would like to get rid of that. Are there any issues with
getting rid of it?
Yes, as soon as root or some other privileged
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:52:06PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
The solution, although hackish, is easy: subscribe all the addresses
you plan on posting from. Then set "nomail" for all addresses except
the one(s) you want to receive list postings.
May I make a feature request for next time
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:15:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:58:46AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:10:44AM -0500, Pug Bainter wrote:
2) How can I setup an umbrella list with the following features:
1) The lists
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:14:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a useful tool for recipients who have it available, but we're
looking for a tool at the list management end that will handle it.
Mailman doesn't do that, sorry.
First, because not all of our subscribers will be able
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Futureweb.at - Patrick Bey-Neuner wrote:
hi,
is there any way to let people subscribe to mailman
but don't have to double confirm it?
Yes (allow open subscribes in mm_cfg.py) but you sure do not want to allow
this unless it's internal to your
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:55:28PM +0200, stephanie wrote:
Bonjour,
Je recherche actuellement des dveloppeurs python.
Si a vous intresse, contactez moi.
Etre stupide ce point, c'est difficile.
Go away evil spammer, not only what you did breaches all rules of
netiquette, and
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:53:43PM -0400, Neil Cooler wrote:
It's windows 2000 that isn't compatible with mailman :-)
(the best part, is that mailman being 95%+ python, it could run on windows
with few modifications, but I don't think any of the people able to do this
would see
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:12:58PM -0400, Neil Cooler wrote:
Is this better for performance?
It can be, but it depends (fork times, how many receipients are included in
each mail, etc, etc...)
Can I tell mailman to use another server to send the mail?
SMTPHOST in
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:12:54PM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Third, there are certain spam filters that the MTA can apply that
should catch more stuff. I thought that the Exim installation on
{python,zope}.org was all hooked up to RBL, etc., but since spam is
getting through, it may not
I setup the autoresponder for a list "thank you for submitting post, we will
review it, etc, etc..."
I have two problems with that.
1) The user gets one autoreply when the message hits the list and an
approval message is fired off to the list admin, and then he/she gets
a second autoreply
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:27:52PM +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
I set up a list, i did a mistake and so after one month all subscriber
received their password valid to unsubscribe.
Since some user MUST NOT unsubscribe the list, there is a way
to "change" the password for them (i have root
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 10:18:11PM -0500, Andy Harrison wrote:
I have a list that I want people to be able to post on who are not members of
the list. I have it set correctly, but it still holds posts. I'll show you a
screen shot if you want, but suffice it to say I've checked the config
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:10:04AM -0500, Arthur J. Byrnes wrote:
At 07:20 PM 2/11/01 -0800, jeff utarzi wrote:
Attn: The President
Dear sir,
FUND MANAGEMENT / BUSINESS OFFER. Blah, blah, blah spam removed
Ok, I started this earlier, and decided that I was just being a
whiner, but now,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:52:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to have binary attachments not encoded in the list
archives?
Not with pipermail, the default archiver.
If you change archivers, then yes.
See the docs and this list archives for answers to your question.
Marc
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 12:37:41PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
I've been bitten again.
I normally run junkbuster so cookies are turned off. Can mailman check
for this situation and alert that cookies are not functioning instead of
just asking again for the name/password with no indication of
I've recently disabled HTML archiving on sourceforge's mailman because after
some tests I found that on big lists, it looked like qrunner has to wait
while the list archive is updated after each post.
It's not a huge deal until you have lists with many posts, and at that time,
updating the
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 11:21:23AM -0400, Jason wrote:
If anyone would know how to do that. Because I can't recompile it with
--cgi-gid because it won't compile... thats why I installed it via
rpm (slackware package manager actually)...
Fix your slackware or use a decent/recent
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:04:57PM -0400, Jason wrote:
Hey I was wondering If I installed mailman with spm (slackware package
manager) because for some reason I can't install it from source.
I installed the rpm version and its giving me GID errors... I was
wondering if there is a way to
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
