On 6/11/10 6:51 AM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
Bob Bader wrote:
I still have a Macintosh 10.3.9 server running the default mailman (version
2.1.4) for mail lists.
We have noticed digests have stopped working, I can send them manually, or if
I set the trigger size to 0
On 8/6/09 9:08 PM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
Thus, the idea of allowing [Approved: password] in the subject header
and removing only that text from the subject has appeal because it
doesn't depend on any characteristics of the message body.
Won't work in an environment in which
On 11/4/07 12:29 PM, Chuck Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a newsletter with 1500+ subscribers which is currently hosted on my
friends house. He has DSL and the connection goes to crap for 5-15 minutes
every time we send one out, other than that it works fine. When I looked at
some
On 10/11/07 2:33 PM, glen martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen several posts about restricting non-subscribers from posting.
This is a little different.
I run a private list where the list-members have decided they don't want
non-subscribers on the threads at all. But occasionally one
On 7/27/07 8:51 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mailman_router should be the first router.
Also, you might check your exim-main-log to see how these messages are
routed and delivered.
The command line command
exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
may provide some insight. The -bt flag
On 6/29/07 7:44 AM, Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two related suggestions.
(1) LHS (left-hand-side) rules
Any incoming mail message whose putative sender matches:
do-not-reply@
do.not.reply@
donotreply@
no-reply@
no.reply@
noreply@
and which is directed to any of the
On 6/29/07 11:23 AM, Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p.s. As as aside, I strongly recommend against callbacks/SAV. It's
inherently abusive, it's a deliberate attempt to bypass site security
policies [and thus illegal in some jurisdictions, but ask your attorney
for clarification
On 5/21/07 4:54 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would argue that Eudora is much more at fault here
Eudora was also the primary source of resistance to the List-* headers, with
its interesting habit of displaying all headers except those in its list of
boring headers. Manipulating
On 3/8/07 10:44 PM, Herman Privyhum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be willing to bet you're waiting on DNS timeouts
at the remote end for one or more of your users
-- their MTA is slowing you down, maybe as a
result of trying to do a reverse DNS
On 3/8/07 1:52 AM, TRON478 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have set up mailman on a suse machine with sendmail. when i open the
administration site and subscribe i get mails (), but when i sent to the
list, the mail never arrives.
You sent the message to which I'm replying from Gmail. If you sent
On 1/16/07 6:57 AM, Kenneth Jacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate both Mark and Barry's informative and prompt replies.
Let me do a little more investigating ... maybe there's some conflict
with one of my FF plugins ...
Did you install a new plugin (or update one) about the time the
On 12/15/06 6:45 PM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:48 AM -0300 12/15/06, Andres Tarallo wrote:
We need to receive a notification that the suscribers had received the mail.
We where thinking in adding a header that makes the mail client return an
automatic answer.
You can
On 11/27/06 11:48 PM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The easiest way is to configure your MTA so that it has a different
and customized configuration that it uses for listening to a
particular numbered port on the loopback interface (a.k.a.,
127.0.0.1), and then you configure Mailman
On 11/22/06 12:03 AM, Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Because I cannot offer http access to the machine where mailman is
installed, I wonder if I can set the subscription process so that it is
available only through email. I understand I will have to edit some
templates with email
On 11/21/06 8:54 PM, vyom asterisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have resently joined this mailing list ,
Plz suggest mailig list if you can ,
It will be a great help
thnks
Suggest you look at the left side of http://www.freepbx.org/.
Near the top is FreePBX Forums which looks promising.
On 11/10/06 9:07 AM, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really should use the power of MTA filtering, it will save you a
lot of frustration. At the very least, use gray-listing because the
vast majority of spam simply won't be resent when a deferral response
is sent from your MTA to the
On 11/3/06 3:23 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I have a website that I want to maintain a list for but my host provider
charges me if I run a list through that hosts. So I figured I could run a
list from my own personal machine and use remote smtp to just mail to the
list. ( its
On 10/27/06 6:17 PM, Jon Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure your postfix aliases for Mailman are case sensitive. I
doubt it. Try mailing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect both messages will get posted to
the list.
You are 100% right. I did NOT know this!! All
On 10/17/06 9:00 AM, Thomas Gramstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have many small lists in Norwegian and they're all being
hit by a lot of spam. Yes, the spam filter holds them back --
but then I get a /lot/ of mail about new messages waiting,
and it's a big job moderating them.
What I
On 10/11/06 4:52 AM, Peter Soccar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using mailman 2.1.7 installed from rpm on fedora 5, as I understand
the default path of adm.py and creator.py should be /etc/mailman
I found adm.py but not creator.py, could it be in any other location?
Aside from what Brad
On 9/24/06 8:19 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming the experiment above works, you could probably create a simple
script in Python (or perl or even a shell script) that would extract
the messages one by one from the mailbox and pipe them to
bin/inject --listname=listname
On 9/12/06 11:26 AM, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version 2.1.5 is rather old. I believe there are some security issues
that have been fixed since that release. IMO it is a good idea to use
the latest version to preclude as many potential issues as possible.
The security fixes are very
On 9/11/06 10:35 AM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1:20 PM -0400 2006-09-11, Matt Herzog wrote:
Not exactly. I have
MTA = Postfix
in mm_cfg.py. Do the spaces matter?
In this case, I don't think that the spaces will be a problem
(although Python does normally care a
On 9/8/06 4:43 AM, David Ellsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, thanks for that Brad, I got it, it's complicated. All I need is a simple
way to get a formatted html email with Approved through the system. You're
telling me that that isn't going to be the case? I'm using an applescript
with
On 8/31/06 4:09 PM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I think either unapproved or unauthorized are the most
appropriate terms. After all, the code is released under the GPL,
and anyone who is making modifications to that code and then making
their modified version available to
On 8/25/06 8:07 AM, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security for one. Much of the impetus for releasing later versions in
the 2.1.X branch was for that reason.
I don't know what, if anything, RedHat is doing about backporting the
security changes. For things in general, they are pretty good
On 8/24/06 6:48 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq02.003.htp.
Unfortunately, both domains used in the examples at the top of that FAQ
entry exist (although the FQDNs of the hosts mailman and poster within those
domains do not,
On 8/24/06 11:11 AM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:41 AM -0700 2006-08-24, John W. Baxter wrote:
Is there any interest in sanitizing the FAQ by adjusting examples to follow
RFC 2606 as closely as possible? I'm reasonably sure that 2.003 isn't the
only entry which could use
On 8/23/06 1:18 PM, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt England sent the message below at 12:14 8/23/2006:
At 8/23/2006 11:52 AM, Patrick Bogen wrote:
I think he meant: auto-moderate new users, and unmoderate them after
some amount of time has passed (e.g., after a day or after a week)
On 7/30/06 6:32 PM, William Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
answering Marty Beilin:
There are some third party providers who might do a good job for you
(listbox comes to mind), or there are providers with free or discounted
services for non-profits who provide Mailman.
Electric Embers is
On 7/17/06 12:31 PM, Jason LaMar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for example)
Mark has answered your question well. I'm just jumping in as I sometimes do
to point out that any likely example domain name one comes up with is likely
taken. This one is relatively new in that
On 6/22/06 9:51 AM, Chris Northwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm at a total loss as to what's going wrong, especially as the logs are
showing nothing, but Exim is saying completed.
You've solved the problem, and the completed wasn't related to the
problem, so this is just a note.
Exim's
On 6/22/06 11:11 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It depends on how the server died and whether Mailman (specifically
OutgoingRunner) was sent a SIGTERM and given a chance to wrapup.
The outgoing message (containing a recipient list in its metadata) is
placed in Mailman's 'out'
On 6/15/06 1:03 PM, Rabinowitz, Ari (Exchange) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try checking to see if postfix is configured to only listen on the loop-back
interface (localhost 127.0.0.1). You should check the inet_interfaces value
in main.cf. If it says
inet_interfaces = localhost then that is
On 6/13/06 12:24 AM, jon lanclos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I click on the link to go to the web interface - I get the following
message ...
Safari can¹t open the page
³http://mail.corporates.com/mailman/admindb/everyone² because it could not
connect to the server ³mail.corporates.com².
On 6/12/06 10:57 AM, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Others on the list do not
have this problem, but he forwarded two copies of a message to me, so
I know it is true for him. The messages looked identical to me.
Start by examining the Received: headers on the two copies of a
On 6/9/06 5:10 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the latter idea which would allow, in the example of chunk size
= 30, for a list of 31 to 60 members to be displayed in two pages
rather than 20 or more. This can make it more difficult to find a
particular member in a large list,
On 6/8/06 6:50 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eli Tuber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:38:08 -0400
To: mailman-users@python.org
Is there a way to not change over to alphabetical view of the members list
once it has over N number of users? I have about 25
On 6/5/06 1:44 AM, 7D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone PLEASE help me with editing the canned standard confirmation
emails for subscribing and unsubscribing to lists? basically a customer wnats
to remove the reference to the web inteface method of confirming the requested
action. Any
On 6/1/06 7:51 AM, Dewhirst, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a mailing list set up to send monthly password reminders.
Today, two of these reminder messages ended up in the Administrative
requests for the list as being posted to the list from non-members.
Coincidentally, the
On 6/1/06 9:30 AM, Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:18:04AM -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
When the configuration is done in the Python language in a Python
script, you can let Python do all the parsing, and do the equivalent
of #include in order to pull in all your
On 6/1/06 1:10 PM, Carl Zwanzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, I agree, but I question a language that relies on indent level
for blocking and don't let you include blank lines for readability. I guess
it's ok when you get used to it. But then again, I mostly work in tcl at
this
On 5/25/06 11:13 PM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mailman does intentionally add a header for Precedence: Bulk to
all outgoing messages, as is appropriate for the function that it is
performing.
Actually,
Precedence: list
(As copied from the message I'm replying to.)
This doesn't
On 5/26/06 7:43 AM, Roland Studer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suddenly postings on our Mailman (2.1.5) list are missing headers, the
mails sometimes arrive without any Information about the sender or the
subject. The headers From and Reply-to and Subject are missing.
In addition I wanted to
On 5/26/06 6:54 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't have to send email commands in the subject. The body is
processed too, but to answer your question, I don't feel uneasy about
sending a list member password. They are mailed in reminders and we
say not to use a valuable
On 5/24/06 5:57 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like it to display From: Teresa
Some MTAs can be--and frequently are--configured to reject such a From:
header, as it violates the email RFCs. Other mail systems may accept such a
From: header but increase the message's
On 5/20/06 4:46 PM, Antonio Dragone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have configured a mail server with Sendmail on my office and mails are sent
fine.
I'm using MailMan to send a newsletter to a test list of five people, one from
hotmail, one from gmail, one from yahoo and two from my ISP
On 5/18/06 9:26 AM, Anne Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just switched over from sendmail to exim because of how well it
(supposedly) works with mailman, but now none of my owner posts are
going through...thus owners are not getting their notifications of
pending posts, etc.
It's
On 5/18/06 10:24 AM, Anne Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne Ramey wrote:
I've just switched over from sendmail to exim because of how well it
(supposedly) works with mailman, but now none of my owner posts are
going through...thus owners are not getting their notifications of
pending
On 5/18/06 11:13 AM, Fabiano Breves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Todd,
I tested the method of using the first line with Approved: password. I would
like to know how can I use the Header way. I don't know how insert it on the
header of the message...
I don't see a way to add a header to
On 5/2/06 10:00 PM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the Mailman side, the canonical answer is FAQ 1.26 at
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.026.htp.
I *think* that the m2f discussion in the above article is stale. The m2f
stable release seems to be at
On 4/30/06 1:28 AM, Tony G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems I am getting duplicate messages from mailman v2.1.5 when senders send
both TO and CC to the list. For some reason no one else in the list is
acknowledging this issue so I look like an idiot complaining about it, but I'm
seeing
On 5/1/06 7:47 AM, John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/30/06 1:28 AM, Tony G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems I am getting duplicate messages from mailman v2.1.5 when senders
send
both TO and CC to the list. For some reason no one else in the list is
acknowledging this issue so I
On 4/29/06 8:00 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sender doesn't instruct *conformant* MTAs at all, does it? AFAIK the
only thing that a RFC 2821-conforming MTA looks at is the Return-Path
header, and it's supposed to remove that.
There is no Return-Path: header during
On 4/29/06 7:50 AM, Thomas Carpentier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sending a message in both Plain Text and HTML doesn't seem to be a
solution. Apple mail displays the Plain Text only (as immediate
alternative). Eudora displays the two parts, plain text and HTML. No
idea about others programs.
On 4/28/06 6:06 AM, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 22:46 -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
If the previous value of the Sender: field is being lost, then
that should be corrected. At the very least, the value should be
saved in an Old-Sender: or Previous-Sender: or
On 4/25/06 8:43 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to install the Apple Developer Tools package that is on the
Mac OS X CDs/DVDs that came with the computer or contained the OS
upgrade you have installed. If you don't have the CDs/DVDs, you can
download the Developer tools from
On 4/26/06 12:30 PM, Tom Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our mail server crashed and we didn't have a back up of the Exim
configuration file. We had some mailman lists running and I remember
there was a command I put up at the top on the configuration file but I
can't remember what is was. Can
On 4/24/06 2:28 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then my questions are what would the purpose of this archive be? and
in what way would members find it useful?
A crutch for users who don't archive their own outgoing mail is the only
thing which comes quickly to mind.
--John
On 4/8/06 7:35 PM, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so it doesn't tend to get a chance to annoy me more than occasionally.
:)
YOU are lucky -:) !!
The continuing outcry against the old way was the reason the alphabetic way
was tried.
The old way produced pages of 30--I think--addresses (count
On 2/22/06 9:23 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you look at the Received: headers in your incoming mail, the one at
the top (last one added) will give the name of the server that your
mail was finally delivered to. Just use that host name in your email
address to completely bypass
On 2/21/06 3:27 PM, Matthew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a mailing list with users subscribed from two particular domains,
call them nice.com and naughty.com. The security czars are naughty.com
have decided that inbound email with naughty.com in the From address
cannot possibly
On 2/21/06 3:27 PM, Matthew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a mailing list with users subscribed from two particular domains,
call them nice.com and naughty.com.
By the way, almost any domain whose name one invents for purposes like this
exists.
nice.com has existed since 1992 (or
On 1/29/06 11:18 AM, Jp Possenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So basically there is none yet. Hopefully in the future there will be. I
don't want to hack anything really, just don't feel comfortable enough, and
it maybe breaking something else in the long run after an upgrade or update.
The fix
On 1/25/06 7:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was told by my hosting company that I need to pick a mailing list manager
for my 14,000+ subscriber e-mail list that would stagger the sending of the
email to something like 300 e-mails per hour to lower the impact on the
On 1/25/06 7:40 AM, John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/25/06 7:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was told by my hosting company that I need to pick a mailing list manager
for my 14,000+ subscriber e-mail list that would stagger the sending of the
email
On 1/3/06 9:29 AM, Sean Roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The macro
MM_LISTCHK=MM_HOME/lists/${lc::$local_part}/config.pck
is later used in a list context
require_files = MM_LISTCHK
So I to would expect the : in $(lc:$local_part) to have to be doubled. But
what seems to be happening is that
On 12/25/05 11:57 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It doesn't look folded correctly in Ralf's message as received here. I
don't see whitespace after the CR LF. Thus the second part isn't a proper
continuation of the header.
Oh, correct
On 12/29/05 11:11 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So I should go for python 2.4?
I installed python2.4, stopped the queuerunner and linked
/usr/bin/python2.4 - /usr/bin/python and restarted the queuerunner.
The problem seems to
On 12/24/05 8:23 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
As you can see, =
Subject: webKess Stations- / Abteilungsregistrierung Elisabeth_KH.1049
was transformed into
Subject: [webKess] webKess Stations- /
Abteilungsregistrierung??Elisabeth_KH.1049
(??
On 12/8/05 6:12 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Williams wrote:
1). A user added a large number of subscribers by uploading
an Excel spreadsheet. Mailman accepted the file and
addresses appeared reasonable when viewed with IE but
not so good with mozilla
On 11/18/05 6:58 AM, Greg Earle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The old machine is running Majordomo and Sendmail, not Mailman and
Postfix. Sorry if that wasn't clearer. So it's not a matter of
just bringing lists/archives/etc. across, alas.
It was very clear in your original post, but that detail
On 11/10/05 5:55 AM, Bryan Carbonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/05, Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2005 01:42 am, Stefan Henrico wrote:
Hi guys
Is there any way for me to retrieve my admin password?
I was under the impression that I do know the
On 11/10/05 9:12 AM, Bob Bales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] HELP, using WIN XP Pro, Admin panel problems#2
Your web browser is not accepting cookies.
Mark, I have cookies turned on in both IE6 and
On 10/25/05 8:09 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ISPs do lots of things with mail besides delivering it or rejecting it.
Some ISPs will just silently discard mail they don't like. Thus in
these cases, you won't see a bounce and the recipient won't see the
mail and the ISP may not
On 10/20/05 7:19 PM, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have this checked as admin only but it showing to anyone whos
subscribed? Any thoughts on this?
Try with a different web browser (or after restart your browser, or you use
the Logout command). Start the test sequence with a different
On 10/19/05 11:14 AM, Dan Szkola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Dan Szkola wrote:
Patched the admin script as suggested. When I saw the error this
morning, I emailed
to the admin address of our test list. Here is what I got:
- Transcript of session follows -
On 9/28/05 1:30 AM, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know.
Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely to
collide.
In addition, the Message-Id values would have to be filtered, if used as is,
for URL-unfriendly
Sorry, I haven't fully searched the FAQ and archives--I'm also guessing I
wouldn't find the answer if I did.
Does someone know without research whether Mailman 2.1.2 will run under
Python 2.4.1.
(Due to a disk failure, we're having to replace the build of a server, while
mailman is running
On 9/14/05 10:46 AM, Sam Gamgee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes yes yes. I know that.
but the results are not permanent. My problem is trying to find out why.
If the fixes are not permanent, then something is fixing them. My memory
of the thread says that this happens periodically.
I've now
On 9/12/05 7:58 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wrapper is telling you that it
expects to be executed as group 'mailman', and it looks from what
you've presented that it was in fact built that way. It also seems you
can't change it in your update package.
The wrapper also
On 9/2/05 2:53 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Morris wrote:
I have a subscriber to digest mode whose ISP is mandating her email
address be in the To or CC header.
The only way I can see to do this is through personalization. I have
seen where I can do that with non-digest
On 8/31/05 7:00 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John == John W Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John But yes, 10 recipients known to Mailman is the limit as set
John up by the default value. Personally, I prefer a setting of
John 1 (I hate broadcasting
On 8/31/05 7:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does max_num_recipients = 10 in the default configuration of the list, means
that when I'm posting to the list I can additionaly write only 9 e-mails along
with the list address and no more? If I'm writing more than 10 e-mail
On 8/26/05 4:04 AM, Tim Howes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am reasonably new to using mailman and I have a problem that I cannot
trace. I have setup a list which is essentially private. I have managed to
test the list by subscribing myself - however the main users of this list at
On 8/10/05 7:36 AM, Tiago Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull escreveu:
So the best solution is to configure the list server to leave the
Reply-To header alone and you get a good mail agent. If you're stuck
with a mail agent that has no reply to list command, then you're
On 8/9/05 7:37 AM, Richard Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We have routers setup in exim, in the following order:
- mailman_router:
- dnslookup:
- system_aliases:
- userforward:
- spam_router:
- localuser:
Lets say our domain is domain.com and we have one mailing list
On 7/28/05 4:13 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this setting change whether or
not postfix runs chrooted or not?
Well, the option probably doesn't change, but the locations of lots of
things do change. For starters, if chrooted, Postfix couldn't find the
wrapped CGI unless it
On 7/18/05 5:09 PM, Jim Tittsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 19, 2005, at 09:00, Tim Arney wrote:
For my mailing list, I have it set so that the senders email
address is
masked with the list address. So for example, I presume if you
receive a
digest of this list then it would come
On 7/9/05 11:31 AM, Daevid Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There should be a way under the Membership Management... section in the
web UI to show all members who are set to 'no mail'. This way I can weed out
users that are basically useless on the list.
But no mail users aren't necessarily
On 6/11/05 9:39 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand why SMTPDirect.pyc is not recreated. It should be
created when OutgoingRunner.py is initialized. It does
The typical--of Python generally--reason is that the process which does the
import doesn't have permissions (on
On 6/6/05 10:06 AM, Carfield Yim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx for the information, however I get problem from the starting...
where can I download the binary of mailman? I just have a mac mini which
don't come with make and gcc. Besides, as I don't have other software
need to compile, I would
On 6/5/05 1:41 PM, Heather Madrone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Mailman on OSX 10.2.8. The setup was straightforward
Installation varies depending on which version of OSX you're running,
and your preferred MTA. For some reason, a lot of versions of OSX
come with sendmail
On 6/4/05 4:51 AM, PeteBell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And is there any reason why emails to a mailman list from Gmail
accounts should not get sent out?
Well, Gmail inserts the very very long--and with few whitespace
interludes--domain keys header. When I read one of those headers in Eudora
On 6/2/05 8:39 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
I know that via the web interface this is quite easy. However, I have a need
to be able to subscribe users via email commands, without the user being
subscribed getting a confirmation email. In other words,
On 6/2/05 8:39 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
I know that via the web interface this is quite easy. However, I have a need
to be able to subscribe users via email commands, without the user being
subscribed getting a confirmation email. In other words,
On 6/2/05 5:50 PM, Larry Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/2/05 2:27 PM, Brad Knowles at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proper mailing list management systems don't use
blind-carbon-copies. The equivalent that they do use is to list
multiple envelope recipients, whose addresses are not
On 6/2/05 6:07 PM, John W. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really. Some MUAs preserve the full Bcc header for anyone in that
header, but removed it for the To: and Cc: recipients. Others set up a Bcc:
header with just the individual recipient's address (clearly these talk to
the MTA
On 5/20/05 3:23 PM, Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
moral of the story: Python hates the French almost as much as Dubya does..
Or perhaps Python's code likes the RFCs.
From RFC 2183:
NOTE ON PARAMETER VALUE LENGHTS: A short (length = 78 characters)
parameter value containing only
On 5/18/05 2:09 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Alternatively, I *think* (Warning! I don't know what I'm talking about)
you can just remove the Mailman/Gui/Archive.py* files alltogether AND
put
ARCHIVE_CATEGORIES.remove('archive')
DEFAULT_ARCHIVE = Off
in
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
