Mark Sapiro writes:
> Are you suggesting that we ignore bounces that can be determined to be
> due to DMARC policy.
Not *completely* ignore. There are several independent actions we can
take based on bounces, depending on list option settings. I'm
suggesting only that we not increment the
tl;dr I miswrote when I wrote that Hotmail is a problem sending
domain. It never was and currently is not. I was thinking of AOL
which was and is a problem.
The rest of this post explains why DMARC is a mostly good thing,
including a *very* high-level view of what it is good *for*.
Mark Sapiro
