On 27 Mar 2021, at 17:14, Andrew Buc wrote:
On Mar 27, 2021, at 12:56 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
You should make sure that it is there and that in the "Access
Control" pane of the license key's window it allows access by
MailMate. If it does not, you can add MailMate there manually or you
could
> On Mar 27, 2021, at 12:56 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> You should make sure that it is there and that in the "Access Control" pane
> of the license key's window it allows access by MailMate. If it does not, you
> can add MailMate there manually or you could just delete that license key
>
On 27 Mar 2021, at 15:03, Andrew Buc wrote:
Last night and this morning MM started refusing to sync with the IMAP
server. I got various messages suggesting Keychain issues. I did some
fooling around with the Keychain (don’t remember the exact steps),
and MM started to sync with the server
Last night and this morning MM started refusing to sync with the IMAP server. I
got various messages suggesting Keychain issues. I did some fooling around with
the Keychain (don’t remember the exact steps), and MM started to sync with the
server again. But I get the “keychain failure” dialog
I think that a smart mailbox is actually simpler to handle and more
reliable besides being more aligned with IMAP. The smart mailbox can
check incoming and outgoing mailboxes for mails that have any recipient
or sender be the specified email address (or more). Basically, the exact
conditions,
On 27 Mar 2021, at 3:47, Andrew Buc wrote:
> 20-odd years ago I was running an OS/2 (really!) mail client, PMMail/2, that
> would let me apply rules to a message when it was sent. For any given friend
> I’d set up a rule sending messages to or from that friend to that friend’s
> dedicated
Making some headway with MM, and I’m taking Philip Paeps’s
suggestion of using FastMail's sieve features to file the mail on the
server when it arrives. Having said that, I think there’s something to
be said for learning at least a bit about MM rules.
20-odd years ago I was running an OS/2
