On 24 Oct 2016, at 21:34, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
On 24 Oct 2016, at 8:39, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
Whether or not this setting is enabled I do think that MailMate
should select the “next” message just as if the action had been
done in the mailbox window. Disabling such behavior is alread
On 24 Oct 2016, at 8:39, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
Whether or not this setting is enabled I do think that MailMate should
select the “next” message just as if the action had been done in
the mailbox window. Disabling such behavior is already a separate
setting:
defaults write com.freron.MailMa
On 8 Oct 2016, at 14:55, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
I wrote in another thread:
2. If I delete that message while it’s open, no message is left
selected. I’d rather the next message in the thread get selected.
I’m a keyboard guy, and while this isn’t a big deal if the
message I want is the la
On 9 Oct 2016, at 17:11, John D. Muccigrosso muccigro...@icloud.com
wrote:
Yes, if you don’t notice when you delete something it’s a problem.
Have you considered changing the delete command to something less easy
to do by mistake? (I also just noticed “Cancel deletion”, but
I’m not sure what
On 09.10.2016 at 18:11 Uhr -0400 John D. Muccigrosso apparently wrote:
Yes, if you don't notice when you delete something it's a problem.
Have you considered changing the delete command to something less
easy to do by mistake? (I also just noticed "Cancel deletion", but
I'm not sure what that
On 8 Oct 2016, at 23:38, Richard Rettke wrote:
BTW, undo only handles the deletion if you noticed it. The all
knowing, all seeing are good with that. A mere mortal like myself, not
so much.
:-)
Yes, if you don’t notice when you delete something it’s a problem.
Have you considered changing t
On 8 Oct 2016, at 21:40, John D. Muccigrosso muccigro...@icloud.com
wrote:
I’m all for having a preference for this. (Though “undo” handles
the accidental deletions.)
I agree, a preference would be a good thing.
BTW, undo only handles the deletion if you noticed it. The all knowing,
all se
On 8 Oct 2016, at 21:38, Richard Rettke wrote:
I too prefer the current behavior. I do not read messages in sequence
and prefer not to have any selected. Also, if it selected the next
message I would be at risk for accidental deletion. I sometimes read
and delete, and sometimes due to infirmit
On 8 Oct 2016, at 11:10, Randall Meadows randy.mead...@not-pc.com
wrote:
To each his own. I prefer the current behavior, because it allows me
to delete the message I'm reading, quickly and easily without my hands
leaving the keyboard, and still leave the "next message" unread, as I
don't hav
My suggestion also leaves the next message unread since I have preview off.
Having nothing selected after delete is a hassle.
John Muccigrosso
> Il giorno 08 ott 2016, alle ore 12:10, Randall Meadows
> ha scritto:
>
> On 8 Oct 2016, at 6:55, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
>
> I wrote in another
On 8 Oct 2016, at 6:55, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
I wrote in another thread:
2. If I delete that message while it’s open, no message is left
selected. I’d rather the next message in the thread get selected.
I’m a keyboard guy, and while this isn’t a big deal if the
message I want is the las
I wrote in another thread:
2. If I delete that message while it’s open, no message is left
selected. I’d rather the next message in the thread get selected.
I’m a keyboard guy, and while this isn’t a big deal if the message
I want is the last one in the inbox (just hit the up arrow), it’s a
p
12 matches
Mail list logo
