On 8 Sep 2016, at 16:43, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
Yes. It still doesn’t work for me. Version 2.0BETA (6054)
I'm afraid it's only in the 1.9.5 release at this time :)
(The Sierra release date is now official. My focus will be on getting
1.9.5 out of beta state and also completing an update
On 8 Sep 2016, at 10:43, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
On 8 Sep 2016, at 3:51, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 8 Sep 2016, at 1:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail,
the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d
prefer they
On 8 Sep 2016, at 3:51, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 8 Sep 2016, at 1:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail,
the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d
prefer they were back in the bcc on the new message.
I believe
On 7 Sep 2016, at 23:20, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 17:05, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
That's what I do, too, which suggests an even more stringent
mechanism: put the original To/Cc lines into the body of the bcc
copy. Yes, it's an extra SMTP, but so is doing it manually.
On 8 Sep 2016, at 1:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail,
the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d prefer
they were back in the bcc on the new message.
I believe this was (recently) fixed when I fixed an issue with
On 8 Sep 2016, at 1:04, Richard Rettke wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2016, at 2:54, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote:
>
>> "IMPORTANT! This message has been blind-carbon-copied to you. Do not
>> reply-to-all or forward it without the author's permission."
>>
>> This text was added to the email body
On 7 Sep 2016, at 17:20, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 19:11, Randall Meadows wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 17:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail,
the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d
prefer they
On 7 Sep 2016, at 19:11, Randall Meadows wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 17:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail,
the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d
prefer they were back in the bcc on the new message.
Then you'd be
On 7 Sep 2016, at 17:05, John D. Muccigrosso wrote:
My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail,
the bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d prefer
they were back in the bcc on the new message.
Then you'd be able to see who was BCC'ed, defeating the entire
My issue with bcc is that when I “reply” to one in my sent mail, the
bcc’ed addresses from the original don’t show up. I’d prefer they
were back in the bcc on the new message.
John
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
On 7 Sep 2016, at 2:54, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote:
"IMPORTANT! This message has been blind-carbon-copied to you. Do not
reply-to-all or forward it without the author's permission."
This text was added to the email body for all bcc recipients.
In some respects it's rather
On 7 Sep 2016, at 17:05, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> That's what I do, too, which suggests an even more stringent mechanism: put
> the original To/Cc lines into the body of the bcc copy. Yes, it's an extra
> SMTP, but so is doing it manually.
FWIW, I do not use BCC either (some people use to
On 7 Sep 2016, at 10:45, Shoshanna Green wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 10:11, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:47, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 9:54, Patrik Fältström wrote:
One thing that I think it was Eudora that introduced, was to add a
"signature" at the
On 7 Sep 2016, at 10:11, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:47, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016, at 9:54, Patrik Fältström wrote:
One thing that I think it was Eudora that introduced, was to add a
"signature" at the beginning of the message body that read:
"IMPORTANT!
On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:47, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2016, at 9:54, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>
>> One thing that I think it was Eudora that introduced, was to add a
>> "signature" at the beginning of the message body that read:
>>
>> "IMPORTANT! This message has been blind-carbon-copied
On 7 Sep 2016, at 9:54, Patrik Fältström wrote:
One thing that I think it was Eudora that introduced, was to add a
"signature" at the beginning of the message body that read:
"IMPORTANT! This message has been blind-carbon-copied to you. Do not
reply-to-all or forward it without the author's
16 matches
Mail list logo
