Hey guys,
I am not sure I understand your issues correctly, but...
Am 13.06.18 um 20:47 schrieb Michael Rathbun:
Based on the usual crude tracking pixel and click-tracking links, we often see
open rates at hotmail/msn/etc at under half those seen elsewhere.
Does this happen "recently"?
Then
Yes.
Similarly, some IPs sending more than 100 messages per day to Outlook.com don't
get any line in SNDS.
The drop of volume you're mentioning might be an explanation to it.
--
Benjamin
De : mailop De la part de Kent McGovern
Envoyé : jeudi 14 juin 2018 02:51
À : mailop
Objet : [mailop] SNDS
I can't see that being the explanation.
Those insights would be best stored elsewhere.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise
Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
"Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
Got the Junk Mail Reporting
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:20:27 +, Vladimir Gabrielescu
wrote:
>It could be the focus inbox effect. If the user ignores your mail long enough
>then they dont even see it
And there would need to be a mechanism for that to happen. If the mechanism
defined by the provider is "make
It could be the focus inbox effect. If the user ignores your mail long enough
then they don’t even see it
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 8:48 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:13:35 -0600, Paul Kincaid-Smith
> wrote:
>
>> if Microsoft's filters were aggressively moving heaps of
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:44:03 -0600, Paul Kincaid-Smith
wrote:
>Yes, the vast majority of mailboxes in EmailGrades' panel are actively used
>by real humans who send and receive email. (But even so, I wouldn't count
>on people replying to most legitimate commercial email like promotions or
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:46:53 +, Michael Wise <
> michael.w...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Do these accounts ever *SEND* email?
> >… Asking for a friend.
>
> Ours don't. No idea about Paul's sampling methods.
>
> mdr
>
>
Yes,
This doesn't sound right, and I'm asking around.
The system knows if you've opened email from a given sender previously, and
it’s not a binary value, but I'd be surprised if it stores that data in the
Safe Senders list. The system also knows if you've REPLIED to that sender.
Aloha,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 at 20:50, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:13:35 -0600, Paul Kincaid-Smith
> wrote:
>
> >if Microsoft's filters were aggressively moving heaps of *wanted* email out
> >of
> >the inbox, I'd expect Outlook's read rates to be lower, but my metrics show
> >that
Is anyone else seeing issues with the volume reported in SNDS? One of our
senders who is on a dedicated IP consistently sends 120-150K/ day to
Hotmail/Outlook, but starting June 6 SNDS is showing the volume in the low
hundreds. Their complaint rate shot up in SNDS as well due to the decreased
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:46:53 +, Michael Wise
wrote:
>
>Do these accounts ever *SEND* email?
>
Asking for a friend.
Ours don't. No idea about Paul's sampling methods.
mdr
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:13:35 -0600, Paul Kincaid-Smith
wrote:
>if Microsoft's filters were aggressively moving heaps of *wanted* email out of
>the inbox, I'd expect Outlook's read rates to be lower, but my metrics show
>that read rates at Outlook are often in line with read rates at Gmail and
Hi MDR,
Like you, we see promotional/marketing email achieve much lower inbox
placement rates at Outlook compared to other ISPs like Gmail, Yahoo! and
AOL. Even from responsible senders.
At EmailGrades we analyze billions of data points a month using panel data
for ESP-wide performance analysis
We have a product, GreenArrow Monitor, that is a fairly standard inbox rate
monitoring tool. Senders incorporate the Monitor seed list, our robot
collects and collates the data, users see the results, merriment may or may
not ensue.
Recently we had occasion to investigate weirdness in Hotmail
14 matches
Mail list logo
