Re: [mailop] And just after I spoke up for Linode being not bad ;)

They do. Those servers then forward to Google Workspace, likely a spam filter or similar. On 1/18/22 9:06 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote: It appears that Michael Peddemors via mailop said: Serious? : host aspmx.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4023:c0b::1a] said: Why do they have their abuse email

Re: [mailop] And just after I spoke up for Linode being not bad ;)

It appears that Michael Peddemors via mailop said: >Serious? > >: host aspmx.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4023:c0b::1a] said: >Why do they have their abuse email address at gmail.. They don't: $ host -t mx linode.com linode.com mail is handled by 2 inbound-mail1.linode.com. linode.com mail is

Re: [mailop] What am I supposed to do with abuse complaints on legit mail?

On 1/17/2022 2:09 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote: It appears that Scott Mutter via mailop said: -=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=- On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:06 PM Grant Taylor via mailop wrote: Drive by comment: What if we had something like an MX record published for the IP address(es) in

Re: [mailop] And just after I spoke up for Linode being not bad ;)

Same thing happened at a similar cloud when I worked at it, we had Gsuite email and no one saw it coming. Most companies seem to be using abuse forms to make up for it and to some degree I get it, forms require intentional input where as people dumping fail2ban logs (and similar) at abuse@

Re: [mailop] And just after I spoke up for Linode being not bad ;)

On 1/18/22 9:22 AM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote: Serious? : host aspmx.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4023:c0b::1a] said: 550-5.2.1 The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate that 550-5.2.1 prevents additional messages from being delivered. For more 550-5.2.1

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Lindo - junked,not blocked

On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:04:30 -0600, John Gateley via mailop wrote: >The IP address in question is not currently blocked in our system. >Please refer to the email message you received from Microsoft and follow >the steps it suggests. I have no detailed knowledge of what the current system

[mailop] And just after I spoke up for Linode being not bad ;)

Serious? : host aspmx.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4023:c0b::1a] said: 550-5.2.1 The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate that 550-5.2.1 prevents additional messages from being delivered. For more 550-5.2.1 information, please visit 550 5.2.1

Re: [mailop] still not a good way to publish contact info, was What am I supposed to do

On Tue 18/Jan/2022 00:47:53 +0100 Scott Mutter via mailop wrote: I feel like the abuse contact that's being suggested in RDAP, RP, rWhois, etc - are all intended to be manually sent by a human, i.e. someone from one of these big name email service providers (Microsoft/Yahoo/Gmail). It is

Re: [mailop] still not a good way to publish contact info, was What am I supposed to do

On Tue 18/Jan/2022 00:34:51 +0100 Grant Taylor via mailop wrote: On 1/17/22 4:08 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote: See my previous message about RDAP.  If people want to publish contact info for their IP ranges, they can do it now in the RIR WHOIS. The problem is that they don't want to. In

[mailop] hosteurope anybody? PRVS not working?

Hi, I'm seeking for somebody from hosteurope. For a client of us, the sender verification callout (<> -> prvs…) back to hosteurope doesn't seem to work as expected. Please contact me by private mail: h...@schlittermann.de Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden

Re: [mailop] [SUBJECT CHANGE] Feedback loops

> On 18 Jan 2022, at 02:32, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 6:06 PM Grant Taylor via mailop > wrote: > Why can't automated and manual reports go to the same address? Isn't > that what recipient side filtering is for? E.g. separating RFC

Re: [mailop] [SUBJECT CHANGE] Feedback loops

Dnia 17.01.2022 o godz. 16:41:26 Michael Peddemors via mailop pisze: > > So, while there are many companies with terrible or no abuse > handlers, the problem maybe is now that the other way, where noone > reports it. Speaking for myself, I don't get a lot of spam, but when I do, I don't bother