Yeah, they were probably back up by the time you tried.
https://twitter.com/mailbox_org/with_replies?lang=en
Looks like they lost both of their fiber interconnects for 30mins or so.
-John
> On Sep 7, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Al Iverson wrote:
>
> It's all responding for me; their website, IMAP endpo
It's all responding for me; their website, IMAP endpoint, and SMTP
injection endpoint.
Regards,
Al Iverson
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 6:06 PM John Von Essen via mailop
wrote:
>
> For the last 15 mins or so. Website is down, and smtp/imap endpoints are
> down, MX is down, etc.,. Like their network j
For the last 15 mins or so. Website is down, and smtp/imap endpoints are down,
MX is down, etc.,. Like their network just dropped off completely…
-John
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On 9/7/22 7:48 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop wrote:
You can contact them and say the netblock has changed hands - and
changed PTR as well hopefully
+1 to contacting Spamhaus and (politely) asking what they want you to do
to achieve your goal. Explain that you / your organization has r
Thanks, obvious when you know how :)
I have contacted them.
Andy
On 07/09/2022 14:48, Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop wrote:
You can contact them and say the netblock has changed hands - and
changed PTR as well hopefully
--srs
--
You can contact them and say the netblock has changed hands - and changed PTR
as well hopefully
--srs
From: mailop on behalf of Simplelists - Andy
Beverley via mailop
Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 7:05:46 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] Removin
Hi,
Can someone point me in the direction of how to remove a whole IP block
from the Spamhaus PBL please?
We have just taken on a new /24 and it is currently listed in PBL
(presumably because it was previously unused). The removal form states
"Removal of IP addresses within this range from t
Now then...
On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:01, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
>> On 7 Sep 2022, at 13:08, Radek Kaczynski (Radek from Bouncer) via mailop
>> wrote:
>> I've been thinking about incorporating blockchain technology and maybe smart
>> contracts to make sure that the sender has the right to s
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 13:08, Radek Kaczynski (Radek from Bouncer) via mailop
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think that destroying all email verifiers is not going to be the solution
> to the problem.
> I think that:
> - when spam filters block based on bounce rates
> - decent senders should have to have
Hello Slavko,
>
> Do you really think, that email operators have nothing better to work as
> contact every one, who decide to use their service for own business? And
> for any new domain do that again and again? Adding to local BL is much
> more simple, provides the same results and -- can be aut
Hello John,
I'm afraid that the suggested price is too high for us; thus we'll be happy
stay away from your servers.
Please send me the list of the domains which you manage, and we will stop
processing email verification for them - and we we will be returning the
"unknown" status to our custom
On Wed 07/Sep/2022 11:57:44 +0200 Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:
I just happened to notice that ARIN is currently reporting "No results found."
for valid entries. Maybe they are down for maintenance? If so, I recommend them
saying that, instead of saying that valid IP addresses in their registry d
I just happened to notice that ARIN is currently reporting "No results
found." for valid entries. Maybe they are down for maintenance? If so, I
recommend them saying that, instead of saying that valid IP addresses in
their registry don't exist.
--
Rob McEwen, invaluement
_
It appears that Radek Kaczynski via mailop said:
>I don't think that.
>Honestly, I hate that we are using YOUR resources without compensating you.
>
>As I wrote before, I'd love to pay. I initially thought about paying a quota
>for using VRFY.
>
>But if it would be hard to implement - I'd love to
I'd guess that myprasarana.onmicrosoft.com is compromised (or has
compromised accounts). I've seen this name before, reported the spam, and
put it on our reject list. Don't know whether Microsoft failed to forward
the spam report, or the tenant's admins are simply incompetent.
Cheers,
Hans-Mar
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 06:15:14AM +, ml+mailop--- via mailop wrote:
> My system is getting spammed by outbound.protection.outlook.com
>
> mail=
> rcpt=, stat=550
> rcpt=, stat=550
>
> and this happens again and again.
> (note: it happened before with other MAIL addresses)
>
> It their MTA b
Dňa 7. 9. o 9:44 Radek Kaczynski (Radek from Bouncer) via mailop napísal(a):
Here I meant - if you as Mail Operator, do not want Bouncer to verify email
addresses hosted by you - please let me know and we will put a rule in our
configuration.
Do you really think, that email operators have no
Hi Hal,
>
> Many marketing people just don't get it when it comes to spam. They can
> always come up with some way to rationalize that their spam isn't spam. I
> wonder if it is genetic.
>
That's why we try to educate marketing folks (we will be running a series of
articles, and webinars this
18 matches
Mail list logo
