> Frido Otten pisze:
> > We're currently having issues when someone with a gmail address
> > sends an email to a 3rd party email address which has a forward to
> > another gmail address. These messages don't arrive in the final
> > recipient mailbox, not even in the spam folder. The forwarded
> >
Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> Dnia 10.07.2022 o godz. 11:03:32 Anne Mitchell via mailop pisze:
> >
> > Or a 'Political' tab, just like the 'Promotions' tab.
>
> What is a "tab" in context of the SMTP protocol?
> What is a "tab" in context of the IMAP protocol, if user uses it to access
>
Paul Vixie via mailop wrote:
> all of these actors might be "trying to make things work" but be taking a
> naive or ignorant or provincial or subjective view of both "things" and
> "work".
By trying to make things work I was thinking of SPF, DKIM, DMARC,
DANE, and DNSBLs, and other, and the list
Tobias Fiebig via mailop wrote:
> Running systems is not easy; Especially for basic infrastructure
> (which email is), it should just _work_.
...
> However, it also circles back to the age old question (among people
> sceptical of centralization) of how we can have more distributed
>
Geoff Mulligan via mailop wrote:
> 1. If a recipient on an email message is both in the To: or Cc: and on the
> mailing list, should the listserver send the message to the recipient:
> a) By default
> b) Not by default (but configurable)
> c) Never
If a message was sent to me
Robert Schoneman via mailop wrote:
> * The offending emails have
> * No attachments
> * One image stored on the same domain the message is sent from
> * No links
Just some questions...
That "One image stored on the same domain the message is sent from"
must be a link,
Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop wrote:
> unsigned messages, unaligned or messages failing validation otherwise, will
> be rejected while in SMTP session.
There are many questions about what will actually be implemented. It
would be extremely useful if t-online.de provided an automated robot
Simon Arlott via mailop wrote:
> Nope, not a "good" provider:
>
> On 14/02/2021 10:32, Linode Abuse wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Thank you for sending this email to us. So that we can verify this
> > complaint, would you be able to send over the header information in the
> > email in a response
Ale via mailop wrote:
> My question is: if my server is properly configured,
Being "properly configured" these days entails needing many things
that you didn't say. Forward-Reverse-DNS, SPF, DKIM, DMARC just for
starters. And then more in other places.
> and i don't send ANY spam mail to
Don Owens via mailop wrote:
> We have the domain back now, but we have to wait for propagation
> delays. If you query the name servers they Arne mentioned, that
> should give you the right IPs.
>
> Sorry for the trouble, folks. Now I have to go see who needs flogging.
Some humor to lighten your
Sam Tuke via mailop wrote:
> With Gmail's self filtering folders, for many smaller hosts the
> chances of a message which gets a 250 response code being "received"
> (reach the eyeballs of the intended recipient) is lower than not. So
> 250 says more about Gmail internals (e.g. the message wasn't
11 matches
Mail list logo
