I did, not sure there was some major outcry from those who receive email
about not seeing logos. Authentication was argued as a reason for this from
the start. That reason has been diminished, so please try again to justify
why this is needed
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:22 PM Marcel Becker via mailo
in, with Google and Yahoo now demanding authentication for
bulk email, what is the point of BIMI?
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 5:10 PM Marcel Becker via mailop
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:12 PM Brett Schenker via mailop <
> mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
>> Since DMARC is now r
Since DMARC is now required by Google and Yahoo for bulk sending, it kind
of makes BIMI not as needed. I'm still not sure what BIMI solves that
enforcing authentication doesn't.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 3:44 PM Gellner, Oliver via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
> > On 10.01.2024 at 17:21 Olg
Anyone from Proofpoint on here? Have a question/need some help off list.
Thanks!
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many Things, Including
5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com
Graphic Policy - http://www.graphicpolicy.com
Twitter - http://twitter.com/bhschenker
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in
Anyone from Constant Contact on here? Need some urgent help with something.
Brett
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many Things, Including
5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com
Graphic Policy - http://www.graphicpolicy.com
Twitter - http://twitter.com/bhschenker
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/
"They can say whatever they want, but .. I'm +1 with John. They have a
*lot* to learn about email and how it works"
Unless the language has changed since I read it, it says you need to report
on how much goes to spam. If you send it to quarantine instead, you can
still report it as 0 going to spam
I work
in.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 1:08 PM Anne Mitchell via mailop
wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 9, 2022, at 8:15 PM, Brett Schenker via mailop
> wrote:
> >
> > Just put it all in quarantine. It only requires reporting on how much is
> going to spam. Reporting 0 would te
Just put it all in quarantine. It only requires reporting on how much is
going to spam. Reporting 0 would technically be correct since quarantine is
different.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 10:05 PM Carl Byington via mailop
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Sat, 2022-07-
I too am looking for a contact for issues I'm seeing with a client, so
would appreciate being pinged offline as well.
Brett
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 10:04 AM Chris Truitt via mailop
wrote:
> We're seeing intermittent AUP#In-1310 bounces from rr.com and other
> Spectrum/Charter owned domains.
> No
I also received some email that was very clearly spam straight into my
priority box. I know others have said the same. Something broke today for
at least a little while.
Brett
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:30 PM Zube via mailop wrote:
> Looks like something changed at gmail today, at least for us.
>
They've been emailing me for a while now for an address that has nothing to
do with the email work I do. I've been trying to figure out how they got
the address.
Brett
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 5:38 PM Anne Mitchell via mailop
wrote:
> WTaF?? (Excuse the unladylike acronym.) I just got spammed BY
Coming from the political/non-profit side of things, when the revenue drops
is when they pay attention. If open rates are 0 or blocks are through the
roof, they take notice and will change their habits. The people that click
spend don't want to explain to their bosses why things have tanked.
On Th
I had it for one on one email to addresses I know are good.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 7:19 PM Tara Natanson via mailop
wrote:
> Sorry that sent before I finished typing.
>
> We are seeing huge spikes in those codes as well. Some testing shows that
> valid addresses are getting that response inter
Is this still on the fritz? My email notifications just lit up with dozens
of listings from IPs but when I click to find out more, the system just
errors out.
Brett
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 1:02 PM Al Iverson via mailop
wrote:
> Looks like 0spam is down again.
>
> Cheers,
> Al
>
> On Fri, Oct 9,
I should add, so that folks don't just think "grey listing," that some
emails are being delivered twice so something is up either at our mailer or
on Comcast, so trying to narrow it down and need some help.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:27 AM Brett Schenker
wrote:
> I was hoping there's someone on
I was hoping there's someone on here that might be with Comcast I can chat
with. We're seeing some issues with them where the email sends but then
isn't delivered for multiple days later and get the 250ok response. It
could be grey listing, it could be something else but hoping to see if
there was
We've been having some issues delivering to optonline, is there anyone from
there on here or anyone have suggestions on how to reach them?
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many Things, Including
5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com
Graphic Policy - http://www.graphicpolicy.com
Twitter - http://tw
Reaching out to see if there's someone with OATH (or someone else) who can
help with a content block from a nonprofit that's trying to get an email
out regarding COVID. Those domains are returning a blocked response due to
content so we're guessing that's the reason.
Thanks!
Brett
--
Brett Sche
Anyone with Yahoo/AOL I can chat with off-list? We're seeing lots of
delays/timeouts for one segment. I know why but trying to figure out a
solution and was hoping to chat with someone.
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many Things, Including
5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com
Graphic Policy - ht
I read this and was wondering if anyone has more info.
https://wordtothewise.com/2020/03/authentication-at-office365/
Particularly I'm wondering if the "from" address mentioned is the visible
from address or does it mean the from address in the header? Anyone know?
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many
If so, can you ping me off list? Thanks!
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many Things, Including
5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com
Graphic Policy - http://www.graphicpolicy.com
Twitter - http://twitter.com/bhschenker
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/brettschenker
_
I'm trying to stop sales from bringing on a new client who doesn't pass the
smell test to me. The data I got out of ReturnPath says they're a
troublemaker and will cause us issues, for all of our clients likely.
Sadly, that data point alone probably isn't enough to kill the sale.
I was hoping if a
Is there a contact for Cloudmark on here? We're filling out the form but
having an issue with an IP range warm up so was hoping there was someone to
chat with and make it go a bit quicker/easier. Thanks!
Brett
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many Things, Including
5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsultin
We're warming up some new IPs and ran into an issue with AT&T. Though we
followed their procedure we still haven't heard from them. Is there anyone
on here that I can chat with? Thanks!
Brett
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many Things, Including
5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com
Graphic Poli
I agree with everything All said and regularly seeing "winback" campaigns
employed and work to varying degrees.
Depending on the type of sender, I find questionnaires work well in this
scenario as part of the chain of emails. Those emails for me have always
gotten high engagement and you get data
al
> mailing. Lots of political types think they're exempt from best
> practices because CAN-SPAM allows it. This seems like a good reminder
> to all here that spam filters and groups like Spamhaus will still
> block this kind of spam and that CAN-SPAM compliance isn't good
> e
We got our entire range listed due to an action of a new client that wasn't
vetted by sales. I pinged the normal Spamhaus channel but wondering if
there's anyone I can reach out to speed up the process.
--
Brett Schenker
Man of Many Things, Including
5B Consulting - http://www.5bconsulting.com
Gr
We're warming up some IPs and one we're getting the response below but
there's no Zen listing (which is what the error code indicates). So was
hoping to chat with someone to figure out what may be the cause of this and
get it resolved.
1565711881@BD/30-27744-70ED25D5@BD/30-27744-70ED25D5@66/AA-277
odi wrote:
> On 26-07-2019 14:38, Brett Schenker via mailop wrote:
> > They've always been a bit cagey when I asked but from what I've been
> > told it's opted-in individuals and data comes directly from email
> > providers they have agreements with. While it'
it as "they don't have a
problem."
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 4:21 PM Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 26-07-2019 13:21, Brett Schenker via mailop wrote:
> > It's been 98.4% inbox placement according to ReturnPath PartnerApp since
> > March... so... yeah...
>
> Ho
-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Brett Sc
I first have to say Gabbard is a client so what I can say is limited but...
Using pretty available info from ReturnPath (that anyone that pays can
get), I have no idea where they're getting the idea they're having
deliverability issues.
Knowing the bigger space,and the stats to go with it, to say
I've noticed a shift since mid-June but our IPs improved overall and have
done so even more during that time frame. More are green now than before.
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 9:38 AM Michael Ellis via mailop
wrote:
> One of my clients is also seeing this for some of his custoers (ESP)
>
>
> > Seein
I had the same issue yesterday and a smaller amount over the weekend. We
don't normally have any listings but suddenly 70ish?
The ones from the weekend, I went through the normal process to remove them
and nothing has happened yet when they're normally removed the next day.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019,
> mailop
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2019 3:05 PM
> *To:* mailop@mailop.org
> *Subject:* Re: [mailop] About to blacklist Marketo - has anyone received
> non-spam from them?
>
>
>
> On 5/28/2019 4:21 PM, Brett Schenker via mailop wrote:
>
> Two real world examples would be
t is an example of
why they would publish their address and based in feedback, they want
though haven't opted in.
On Tue, May 28, 2019, 6:15 PM Rob McEwen via mailop
wrote:
> On 5/28/2019 4:21 PM, Brett Schenker via mailop wrote:
>
> Two real world examples would be elected officia
Two real world examples would be elected officials to be contacted and some
corporations to be contacted. The former absolutely has reasons to be bulk
emailed, the latter possibly too. Both would be "published" email
addresses. For your average person, probably not but it's not a hard 100%
rule as
I've had similar issues with a few of our clients and have had them focus
on sending to openers and clickers for Gmail. The clickers/openers universe
gets 30-46% open rates. For the rest when we test "inactive" for Gmail
after about two weeks the open rate has increased from 2% to 8%.
I think this
38 matches
Mail list logo