Re: [mailop] Calling out Mailjet and diginico.com

Hi Anne, Apologies for the frustration on this. I've reached out directly to you so we can get this resolved. Best, Nick Schafer | Manager of Deliverability & Compliance n...@mailgun.com This message and all attachments are for the exclusive use of the recipients and

Re: [mailop] The final death of Mailjet

Hi Jarland, Apologies for the confusion here. We are still accepting abuse complaints. Can you email the complaints to ab...@mailjet.com and our team will respond as soon as they can. We are going through an email migration and that may have caused the cont...@mailjet.com email address to

Re: [mailop] BIMI pilot @ Google

On 2020-07-23 21:00 BST, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > If you had a workable idea for how to do this without a new authority > and money changing hands, I'm sure everyone involved would love to > hear about it. I'm not as sure as you are. To be part of BIMI is to be in a relatively exclusive

Re: [mailop] BIMI pilot @ Google

On 2020-07-23 03:26 BST, Ted Hatfield via mailop wrote: > It appears that to reach wide spread adoption of this protocol we're going > to be creating a new kind of certificate authority that is specific to > trademarked images and logos. All so we can certify that the logo passes > BIMI

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

On 2020-05-07 18:07 BST, John Levine via mailop wrote: > My users have lots of addresses and my mail system lets them use > whatever From: address they want. Interesting. That seems liberal, and also risky isn't it? What's the advantage that makes up for the risk (if you agree there is some)?

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application {dkim-fail}

On 2020-05-07 15:36 BST, Ned Freed via mailop wrote: > > On 2020-05-07 11:04 BST, Evan Booyens via mailop wrote: > > > Often the hacked account is used to send mail from a spoofed domain. > > > Why would an email provider permit its users to spoof either the > > mail-from or the header-form? > >

Re: [mailop] DMARC policy application

On 2020-05-07 11:04 BST, Evan Booyens via mailop wrote: > Often the hacked account is used to send mail from a spoofed domain. Why would an email provider permit its users to spoof either the mail-from or the header-form? -- Nick ___ mailop mailing

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

On 2019-10-14 17:10 BST, John Levine via mailop wrote: > In article <20191014135812.gh2...@acrasis.net> you write: > >My question remains unanswered. Why not treat each ip address on its > >own merits? Is it technically infeasible, too expensive, less > >convenient, or what? > Given the

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

On 2019-10-14 17:12 BST, John Levine via mailop wrote: > >It's unclear whether the support consideration applies to Google. > >There is no formal support who can be contacted, is there? (A result > >from my web search said "if you’re lucky, a Google volunteer may > >assist you further" on their

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

On 2019-10-14 15:47 BST, Steve Atkins via mailop wrote: > On 14/10/2019 14:58, Nick via mailop wrote: > > > > My question remains unanswered. Why not treat each ip address on > > its own merits? Is it technically infeasible, too expensive, less > > convenient, or w

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

On 2019-10-14 15:38 BST, Alexander Zeh via mailop wrote: > My best guess from a receivers perspective is: > If >99.9% of the traffic from a netblock were spam (let’s say from > half of the IPs in that block), I don’t want to accept any more > messages from the other IPs from the same netblock (and

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

On 2019-10-14 14:41 BST, Graeme Fowler via mailop wrote: > On 14 Oct 2019, at 14:30, Nick via mailop wrote: > > If an ip address in the range is held by a legitimate mailer, you're > > saying the legitimate mailer will be evicted to make way for the > > spammer? Do

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

On 2019-10-14 14:14 BST, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote: > > > On 14 Oct 2019, at 14:01, Nick via mailop wrote: > > to be current practise. I don't see an answer to my question about > > considering ip addresses individually. > > > Because too many providers m

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

On 2019-10-14 13:32 BST, Steve Atkins via mailop wrote: > Consider cloud providers, VPS providers, ESPs etc, and > whether they enforce any sort of ToS forbidding abusive traffic > from their customers. > > If a provider consistently allows abusive traffic from their > customers then they attract

Re: [mailop] Gmail marking email from me as spam

On 2019-10-14 11:21 BST, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote: > Yeah. I think there’s been a bit of a shift back to looking at your > network space and surrounding IPs. Why? (I ask this in ignorance of the underlying technicalities, and about ipv4 only.) There are only about 3 billion public ipv4