On 2019-10-14 15:47 BST, Steve Atkins via mailop wrote: > On 14/10/2019 14:58, Nick via mailop wrote: > > > > My question remains unanswered. Why not treat each ip address on > > its own merits? Is it technically infeasible, too expensive, less > > convenient, or what? > > There's more than one reason. Some are technical. > > But also expending the effort to track an ever-changing > set of reputation-IP pairs against hostile actors
Isn't that effort already being expended every day? Do you mean it would increase by some too-costly multiple? > is subsidizing providers whose business model relies on allowing > customers to send malicious traffic, including unwanted email, to > the customers of those who are being asked to expend that effort. That's the first mention I've seen of a subsidy - could you elaborate on how that works? Thanks, -- Nick _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
