Oh sry just saw Emanuel’s response.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 7:37 AM Opti Pub wrote:
> I agree on a longer TTL in general if you’re not doing maint but a short
> TTL shouldn’t cause failures by itself… unless you’re maxing a limit on
> lookups or something?
>
> Looks like it’s on cloudflare who
I agree on a longer TTL in general if you’re not doing maint but a short
TTL shouldn’t cause failures by itself… unless you’re maxing a limit on
lookups or something?
Looks like it’s on cloudflare who claims not to cap/cut off lookups but
maybe you have some reporting on that end you could check
Oh sry after rereading yeah looks like you’re impacted by gmail guidelines
(dmarc required)
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:04 PM Opti Pub wrote:
> I’m seeing some (inaccurate) 0% logging on the 26th across some domains.
> I’ve also seen a bunch of others reporting the same so that maybe what
>
I’m seeing some (inaccurate) 0% logging on the 26th across some domains.
I’ve also seen a bunch of others reporting the same so that maybe what
you’re experiencing.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:02 PM L. Mark Stone via mailop
wrote:
> I believe you need a DMARC record...
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> The Google Postmaster tool is a joke for me. Apparently you have to have
10's of millions of messages coming from the server for Google Postmaster
to report anything.
You don’t have to have that much volume for data… this behavior is typical
of GMT if your domain rep is very low (IE bad/dark
+1
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:14 PM Louis Laureys via mailop
wrote:
> We decided to keep this because I read that some webmail clients are
> planning to support BIMI without checking for certificates, or,
> perhaps, also displaying a little lock icon in the corner of the
> sender's BIMI-style
https://github.com/domainaware/parsedmarc
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM Scott Mutter via mailop
wrote:
> If DMARC reports could be sent in JSON format, they would be more easily
> parseable.
>
> At least, that's my opinion.
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 2:47 AM Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop
I think that’s the point, mostly all of them used to allow direct setup but
don’t anymore (when universal fbl became widespread). Seznam is one of 20+.
Now that you have to pay for it maybe more vendors will start allowing
direct setup again? That’s what I’m wondering about.
I guess we will see.
I do agree with your thoughts. A good platform gives the users the control
to do what they want with FBLs via automation (doesn’t force to unsub
globally but yes some senders prefer do that).
I think the point though, is whether or not Validity having control over
(or any single entity) is good
I should clarify I meant it’s irrelevant as far as the topic of the thread
is concerned (what peoples thoughts are on this new pay to play situation
with FBL).
I’m curious what others thoughts are on that specific subject (the thread
topic).
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:12 PM Scott Mutter via
I'll chime in.
For me the thing that doesn't sit well for me is that the inbox
providers have adopted the universal fbl and force you to use that (at
least from the available info on their postmaster sites) rather than
being able to set up directly with them like you used to be able to.
Whether
Hi all,
I've been having a really hard time getting any information on whether
or not gaining access to the yahoo performance feeds they claim to
offer.
Is anybody from Yahoo on here that can help, or does anybody have any
advice on how to get access?
I have a block I'm trying to resolve but I'm getting a 403 when trying
to submit a ticket for a couple days now.
https://olcsupport.office.com/
I also haven't gotten any replies from del...@messaging.microsoft.com either.
Can anybody else confirm this? Any contacts on here that can help me out?
13 matches
Mail list logo
