> On 14 May 2023, at 18:03, Paul Gregg via mailop wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 05:54:28PM +, Slavko via mailop wrote:
>> Dňa 12. mája 2023 13:40:14 UTC používateľ Paul Gregg via mailop
>> napísal:
>>
>>> 4.5.3.1. Size Limits and Minimums
>>
>> When you read RFC, you MUST read
> On 12 May 2023, at 14:40, Paul Gregg via mailop wrote:
>
> I'd like to start a discussion on folks opinions(*) on enforcing
> Envelope Sender/Recipient local-part length limits.
>
> *opinions - because no mail operator seems to agree what it should be.
>
> For context, RFC5321 defines
> On 19 Apr 2022, at 16:11, Michael Peddemors via mailop
> wrote:
>
> And we also see that they have not yet 'hard enforced', but it looks like
> some trigger on a domain results in requiring SPF for that domain.
>
> Of course, we don't expect Google to reveal their secrets, but we can
On 09/04/2021 09:10, Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop wrote:
Hi Tom,
/
Would someone from t-online.de please publish the COMPLETE and DEFINITEIVE set
of ALL rules for sending to your customers? Preferably on your web site instead
of in mailops, so that everyone can see them?
I’ve seen bits and
On 04/12/2020 16:35, Mary via mailop wrote:
Hello,
Is it common to see emails from Microsoft having a bad DKIM signature?
Here is an example:
opendkim[614]: B78DA4A48C: external host
mail-bn8nam11on2062.outbound.protection.outlook.com attempted to send as
accountprotection.microsoft.com
On 09/10/2020 13:20, Michael Orlitzky via mailop wrote:
On 2020-10-09 03:19, Steve Atkins via mailop wrote:
I like Hurricane Electric's tools.
https://bgp.he.net/AS14061
After a copy/paste, grep, and consolidation of those ranges I wind up
with...
A lurker pointed out that the first four
On 09/10/2020 04:41, Michael Wise via mailop wrote:
I tried doing a WHOIS lookup, but it just referred me here, which
doesn’t have it:
I like Hurricane Electric's tools.
https://bgp.he.net/AS14061
Cheers,
Steve
https://www.as14061.net
So far, I’ve got:
157.230/16
159.89.16
On 12/02/2020 16:47, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
Does this fly, or am I missing something critical ?
If you block for content or black-listed host and there is a DMARC
reporting address report the appropriate details to the DMARC
reporting address(es) ?
OK, I haven't thought through
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 5:03 AM, Tom Wong-Cornall via mailop
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 25 '20 at 08.26 NZDT, Alessandro Vesely via mailop
> wrote:
>> Sending out DMARC aggregate reports will increase your footprint. (This is
>> possibly controversial, as recipients may tag aggregate reports as
On 02/12/2019 23:59, John Levine via mailop wrote:
I warned a guy away from Hetzner and OVH if he wants to send mail so he
reasonably asked what VPS provider in Europe is better for sending mail.
Any suggestions?
Anyone but OVH, linode, digitalocean or ec2would be a good start (for
very
On 23/11/2019 19:05, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via mailop wrote:
"Rolf E. Sonneveld via mailop" writes:
What would be a good strategy for this customer to update his list of
contacts?
If it's old enough that they're asking the question, and are afraid of
the impact of even a single "Hey, still
On 21/11/2019 13:10, Luke via mailop wrote:
One of the features of email is that it you can send responses back
about the status or handling of a message. Here's one such response
from a gmail server:
/550 5.7.1 Unauthenticated email from domain.tld is not accepted due
to domain's
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 4:39 PM, Nick via mailop wrote:
>
> On 2019-10-14 15:47 BST, Steve Atkins via mailop wrote:
>> On 14/10/2019 14:58, Nick via mailop wrote:
>>>
>>> My question remains unanswered. Why not treat each ip address on
>>> its own
On 14/10/2019 14:58, Nick via mailop wrote:
My question remains unanswered. Why not treat each ip address on its
own merits? Is it technically infeasible, too expensive, less
convenient, or what?
There's more than one reason. Some are technical.
But also expending the effort to track an
On 14/10/2019 12:33, Nick via mailop wrote:
On 2019-10-14 11:21 BST, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
Yeah. I think there’s been a bit of a shift back to looking at your
network space and surrounding IPs.
Why?
(I ask this in ignorance of the underlying technicalities, and about
ipv4 only.)
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Chris Woods via mailop
> wrote:
>
> After recently receiving yet more spam from standards-compliant spam servers
> (valid SPF, DMARC and domains on mainstream TLDs and delivery tolerating
> greylisting), this discussion got me thinking again. Some open
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 4:31 PM, Brotman, Alexander via mailop
> wrote:
>
> One of the interesting things I’ve learned while interacting with ESPs is
> that some of them will artificially restrict the number of messages per
> session, in lieu of opening more sessions. Some of them have told me
On 21/08/2019 09:16, Michael Hallager via mailop wrote:
A well known Australian electronics retailer has recently started
spamming me. It's plainly obvious where they - or someone who provided
it to them - got the email address from the WHOIS because that is the
only place that address is
> On Jul 23, 2019, at 6:40 PM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
>
> The latest trend in B2B spam (at least in my inbox) seems to be from
> companies spamming me via their Microsoft hosted email, usually with a
> DKIM signature of something.onmicrosoft.com and from a Microsoft IP
> address.
>
> Is
> On May 28, 2019, at 11:35 PM, Brett Schenker via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Yup, believe that happens in California a lot. Signing up to vote too it
> happens.
But that's the opposite of the example you gave of "elected officials to be
contacted". One is mail being sent to someone who has
ent of the email or as an attachment to
the email) to: relea...@startribune.com. Please specify the topic of your press
release in the subject line of your email."
Cheers,
Steve
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:16 PM Jay Hennigan via mailop
> wrote:
> On 5/28/19 12:37 PM, Steve Atki
> On May 28, 2019, at 7:47 PM, Jay Hennigan via mailop
> wrote:
>
> On 5/28/19 10:57 AM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop wrote:
>> I'm pretty much giving up on Marketo - and about to BL them and also
>> recommend to others that they do so - as I have *never* received anything
>> other
> On May 20, 2019, at 10:17 AM, Brent Clark via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Good day Guys
>
> Just want to check with the community.
>
> My colleague has proposed that at smtp time, if a mail is deemed as spam, the
> server issues a reject code, but then to too accept the mail and forward the
>
> On May 10, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Leo Gaspard via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Laura Atkins via mailop writes:
>> For victims of listbombing, COI isn’t an answer. In fact, much of the
>> problem with listbombing is COI mail.
>>
>> How do you propose to address that issue?
>
> Captchas are a way to
> On May 1, 2019, at 2:51 PM, Chris Adams via mailop wrote:
>
> I have customers that (unwisely) depend on sending email to SMS via the
> @vtext.com gateway. Lately, the messages have been periodically backing
> up in our queues because the Cloudmark SMTP servers reject the messages.
> I get
25 matches
Mail list logo
