Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop skrev den 2024-02-13 16:00:
I still think implementing SPF and SRS gives more value than ARC.
On 13.02.24 16:17, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote:
oh dear, if you really need both spf and srs, your problem is more
deep then linux
OP stated they already do
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop skrev den 2024-02-13 16:00:
I still think implementing SPF and SRS gives more value than ARC.
oh dear, if you really need both spf and srs, your problem is more deep
then linux
begin trust maillists domains in arc, get better stable results on spf
dkim
On 02.02.24 16:26, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
Skip SRS and implement ARC for forwarded e-mails. This should
solve all these problems.
On 2024-02-04 23:02:31 (+0800), Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop wrote:
Does anyone blindly trust ARC signatures from random domains?
I find it a huge
On 2024-02-04 23:02:31 (+0800), Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop wrote:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
On 02.02.24 16:26, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
On 02.02.24 16:26, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
Skip SRS and implement ARC for forwarded e-mails. This should solve
all
It appears that Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop said:
>>Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
>>>We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
>>>implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
>
>On 02.02.24 16:26, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
>>Skip
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 4 Feb 2024 16:02:31 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
napísal:
> Does anyone blindly trust ARC signatures from random domains?
How one can trust that, if one don't know how (or if at all) original
was checked? If i will blindly trust to that, i don't need to check SPF,
> Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
> > We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
> > implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
On 02.02.24 16:26, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
> Skip SRS and implement ARC for forwarded e-mails. This should
Hellow Matus,
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 16:02 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
wrote:
> > Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
> > > We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether
> > > to
> > > implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
>
> On
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
On 02.02.24 16:26, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
Skip SRS and implement ARC for forwarded e-mails. This should solve
all
Dnia 3.02.2024 o godz. 13:34:43 Philip Paeps via mailop pisze:
> (There is something to be said for hard-enforcing specifically
> "v=spf1 -all", but policies with anything between the v=spf1 and the
> -all are overwhelmingly configuration errors, and should only count
> for scoring.)
I am glad
On 2024-02-03 09:01:40 (+0800), Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
On 2024-02-02 at 10:26:55 UTC-0500 (Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:26:55 +0100)
Kai Bojens via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on
On 2024-02-02 23:08:54 (+0800), Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop wrote:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
The team here says that DMARC means there will never be alignment on
an SRS forwarder domain because the
Hellow Kai,
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 16:26 +0100, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
> Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
>
> > We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
> > implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
>
> Skip SRS and implement ARC for
Bill Cole via mailop skrev den 2024-02-03 02:01:
Telling the next hops that they need to parse ARC and trust your system
instead of just checking SPF is a choice that one can make, yes.
there is nothing to tell, its trustness or not
maillist arc trustness: yes
direct to mx trustness: no
in
On 2024-02-02 at 10:26:55 UTC-0500 (Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:26:55 +0100)
Kai Bojens via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
Skip SRS and implement ARC for forwarded e-mails. This should solve all
these problems.
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
The team here says that DMARC means there will never be alignment on an
SRS forwarder domain because the envelope-from /must /match the mail-from.
What we're wondering is,
18 matches
Mail list logo
