Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-16 Thread Bryan Bradsby
> If you see this ... > > X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM > (Specifically, the "SFV:SPM") > > That means we thought it was spam grep SFV:SPM spam/* | wc -l 56 Thank you Michael, that contribution to the community will be useful to us. Bryan Bradsby 512.936.2248 Texas State

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-15 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00:01PM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage > from the servers called.. > > mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com I've seen a noticeable uptick in (obvious) spam from the following

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-15 Thread Michael Wise
mailop.org] On Behalf Of Rich Kulawiec Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 5:15 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook.. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00:01PM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage > from th

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Franck Martin
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from > the servers called.. > > mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com > > And over the last week, those numbers substantially

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Noel Butler
On 15/09/2015 05:34, Michael Wise wrote: We are compelled to deliver it; talk to the senders who wander around wondering what the heck happened to a message that they handed off to a given mailhost and it was never delivered. We've all been seeing that for over a decade with hotmail, we

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Noel Butler
On 15/09/2015 06:54, Franck Martin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors > wrote: > >> Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from the >> servers called.. >> >> mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Lena
> From: Michael Wise > The account has probably already been killed. I doubt that. I quoted entire header and the one-line body, but: == Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:03:03 +0300 From: l...@lena.kiev.ua To:

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
al Message- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Noel Butler Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 3:16 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook.. On 15/09/2015 05:34, Michael Wise wrote: > > We are compelled to deliver it; talk to the

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -Original Message- From: Michael Peddemors [mailto:mich...@linuxmagic.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:25 PM To: Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com>; mailop <mailop@mailop.org> Subject: Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook.. On 15-09-14

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Wise
[mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Michael Peddemors Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:00 PM To: mailop <mailop@mailop.org> Subject: [mailop] Protection Outlook.. Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from the servers called.. https://na01.safeli

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Peddemors
On 15-09-14 12:16 PM, Michael Wise wrote: If you see this ... X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM (Specifically, the "SFV:SPM") That means we thought it was spam, but due to the pipelined nature of our service, rather than drop it on the floor as some do, we were compelled to