Re: [mailop] DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

2018-07-20 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Here's mine: h=from:to:subject:mime-version:sender:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:feedback-id; I saw some recommendation not to sign "To" but I don't think it is a good practice (for the generic use case). If you don't sign the To then anyone can "replay" your message to

[mailop] Anyone from iinet.net.au ?

2018-07-20 Thread Mathieu Marnat
Hi, I am looking for a person that is part of the abuse team of iinet.net.au (or a form if they cannot be contacted directly). Anyone already had the occasion to discuss with them ? Thank you for your help ! Mathieu. ___ mailop mailing list

Re: [mailop] DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

2018-07-20 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
Ugh, list-unsubscribe headers are required to be removed by mailing lists. Well, I guess technically only if their sublists, but that's a distiction I bet most don't make. Though, the chances of a message passing dkim through a mailing list is practically non-existent anyways. And marketing mail

Re: [mailop] DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

2018-07-20 Thread Grant Taylor via mailop
On 07/19/2018 11:18 PM, Autumn Tyr-Salvia wrote: Hello Email Folks, Hi Autumn, I know signing the From: field is required by spec, but I think everything else is technically optional. For those of you who have been in the position of choosing which headers to sign and which not to, would

Re: [mailop] Is GDPR the end of Whois?

2018-07-20 Thread Steve Atkins
> On Jul 20, 2018, at 9:52 AM, J Orlando Letra via mailop > wrote: > > Hi Email Folks, > > recently enom.com stopped showing 'whois' info which used to allow us to > verify, to some extent, the authenticity of senders. Enom and everyone else, thanks to (a misunderstanding of?) GDPR. >

Re: [mailop] DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

2018-07-20 Thread Kurt Andersen (b)
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Autumn Tyr-Salvia wrote: > > > ... I have lately had some customers with greater-than-usual issues > relating to ... messages that get forwarded, where the forwarding system is > changing headers to the point that they break DKIM > Aside from this being a great

Re: [mailop] DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

2018-07-20 Thread Autumn Tyr-Salvia
Hello, First - Benjamin, Steve's post is not a coincidence - he and I had a conversation about the specific issue I'm dealing with, which was super helpful, and I suspect sparked this blog post. I wanted to get a few more data points, which is why I posted here, but his blog post is indeed very

Re: [mailop] DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

2018-07-20 Thread Dave Crocker
On 7/20/2018 12:06 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: h=from:to:subject:mime-version:sender:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:feedback-id; I saw some recommendation not to sign "To" but I don't think it is a good practice (for the generic use case). If you don't sign the To then