> On 23 Mar 2023, at 14:47, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does anybody from mailgun read here?
> Your messages are tmprejected at our systems, w/o any chance to pass
> ever.
Why are you using tmp rejections for something permanent?
laura
--
The Delivery Experts
Hi,
does anybody from mailgun read here?
Your messages are tmprejected at our systems, w/o any chance to pass
ever.
--
Heiko
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Hi Heiko,
Feel free to hit me up off list about this and I'll be happy to take a look at
it!
Thanks,
Renate
From: mailop on behalf of Heiko Schlittermann via
mailop
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 9:47 AM
To: mailop
Subject: [mailop] mailgun anybody?
Laura Atkins via mailop (Do 23 Mär 2023 16:31:38 CET):
> > does anybody from mailgun read here?
> > Your messages are tmprejected at our systems, w/o any chance to pass
> > ever.
> Why are you using tmp rejections for something permanent?
Depending on the on several conditions the messages would
It appears that Sebastian Nielsen via mailop said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>This mailing list does it, and I thinks it works well.But if you want the pure
>solution, you could
>go the rfc822 route, where you take a mail (where the adress
>forw...@example.org expands to
>tar...@gmail.com)
I'd like to add a +1 to this for clarification, but in my case I'm
focused solely on SRS. Will Hotmail reject DMARC failures based on From
headers or envelope senders? I mean, Gmail already rejects a lot of
DMARC failures based on From headers (I assume, since rewriting envelope
sender doesn't
On 2023-03-23 22:47, Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
Hi,
does anybody from mailgun read here?
Your messages are tmprejected at our systems, w/o any chance to pass
ever.
b/c they were sending spams?
regards.
___
mailop mailing list
