I just had an email exchange with the CEO of Support Intelligence - and
he is going to look into this and hopefully fix it tomorrow (Friday)
(or maybe I should say "later today" since it is after midnight and
technically Friday already from where I'm typing this)
--
Rob McEwen
I know SPF generates some polarizing views, but my view is this:
- if you can trust that legit mail will have a 100% pass rate for legit email,
use a hardfail and those operators who evaluate it and use it will see benefit.
Win.
- if you can't trust that pass rate, publish a soft fail and let
I'd say you're likely to get two types of receivers: those that know that
spf policies are useless so they'll ignore -all, and those who think that
they should do what the policy says.
I'd say that most people who believe the latter are smaller operators.
I don't see any reason to publish -all
Hello Mail Operators,
My job is to help large organizations figure out their email infrastructure
and authenticate everything legitimate with the goal of going to DMARC
p=reject. A customer recently reported an issue to me about receiver
behavior that I hadn't heard before, so I wanted to reach
They are no longer a customer.
Tara
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:42 PM Tara Natanson
wrote:
> I can tell you we do not support this. I am looking into how it got
> past. I am not able to reply to the other list you posted this to
> however.
>
> Tara Natanson.
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:37 PM
Anecdotally, I saw a similar report of a domain that's years old being
reported there. Seems like they're having issues.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:22 PM Tim Starr wrote:
> We've noticed a couple of domains listed by Day Old Bread (
> http://support-intelligence.com/dob/) today, one ours, one not
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:20 PM Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> On 12/6/18 12:47 PM, Al Iverson wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:34 PM Jay Hennigan
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Is this now compliant with Constant Contact's current policy?
> >
> > My experience is that if you report a bad guy to them, they
On 12/6/18 12:47 PM, Al Iverson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:34 PM Jay Hennigan wrote:
Is this now compliant with Constant Contact's current policy?
My experience is that if you report a bad guy to them, they will nuke.
When you contacted Constant Contact about, what did they say?
I
I can tell you we do not support this. I am looking into how it got past.
I am not able to reply to the other list you posted this to however.
Tara Natanson.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:37 PM Jay Hennigan
wrote:
> I just received spam from jeb...@cogzentappz.com sent via Constant
> Contact.
I just received spam from jeb...@cogzentappz.com sent via Constant
Contact. Headers verify that it is indeed from Constant Contact. The
spam was sent to an address that has never sent mail nor received any
legitimate mail. The address appears to have been obtained by e-pending
as the spam is
We've noticed a couple of domains listed by Day Old Bread (
http://support-intelligence.com/dob/) today, one ours, one not ours, both
of which are much more than 5 days old. Is that blacklist broken?
Tim Starr
Maropost.com
___
mailop mailing list
Ryan,
Send me the info and we'll get it in front of the right person.
Anne
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Ryan Harris via mailop wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I sent a takedown request to ab...@godaddy.com, also filled out an abuse form
> on a domain they are hosting which is phishing/malware. No
Hello,
I sent a takedown request to ab...@godaddy.com, also filled out an abuse
form on a domain they are hosting which is phishing/malware. No response
and domain is still up.
Does anyone have suggestions on how to get GoDaddy to respond to a take
down request?
Ryan
That sounds like, “TimeTravel”. Hmm.
That’s what we call retroactively moving things to Junk if it looks too much
like a spam campaign in the eyes of the machine.
I’ll forward this to others who are in a better position to investigate it.
All I can go on, usually, is the Dest:I or J.
Aloha,
Hi Michael,
When you say the wording is very important, do you mean that "please escalate"
isn't correct? I just tried the word "escalation" (I checked, I didn't use this
one exactly yet), we'll see. If there's another wording to use ... I'd love to
know it =)
The "proof" I have that emails
I just wanted to give an update on this. It seems that after waiting 7 days
and sending 6 email replies (to my initial message), I finally was able to get
a positive response back from ATT removing our customers IP's from their
blocklist within 24/48 hours. A few things to note if anyone else
For PowerMTA specific questions, I strongly advise to ask on
https://forum.port25.com rather than here.
That being said: why using "route"? Why the queue? Maybe it's related to your
specific settings, but it might not be useful.
Hint: limit your max-msg-per-connection to less. Start with 50
LOL!
Oh well...
defined a macro...
domain-macro orange-domains wanadoo.fr, orange.fr
defined a queue...
route smtp-in.orange.fr
max-smtp-out 1
max-msg-per-connection 500
and then told it to redirect stuff...
# Domain Settings
queue-to smtp-in.orange.fr.queue
and
18 matches
Mail list logo
